BAHÇEŞEHİR UNIVERSITY BİLGİ PAKETİ / DERS KATALOĞU
| BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION | |||||
| Bachelor | TR-NQF-HE: Level 6 | QF-EHEA: First Cycle | EQF-LLL: Level 6 | ||
Course Introduction and Application Information
| Course Code | Course Name | Semester | Theoretical | Practical | Credit | ECTS |
| EAP5103 | Finance and Governance in Educational Institutions | Spring Fall |
3 | 0 | 3 | 8 |
| This catalog is for information purposes. Course status is determined by the relevant department at the beginning of semester. |
Basic information
| Language of instruction: | Turkish |
| Type of course: | Non-Departmental Elective |
| Course Level: | Bachelor’s Degree (First Cycle) |
| Mode of Delivery: | Face to face |
| Course Coordinator : | Dr. Öğr. Üyesi ATAKAN ATA |
| Course Lecturer(s): |
Assoc. Prof. SİNEM VATANARTIRAN Dr. BETÜL TARHAN ALKAN |
| Recommended Optional Program Components: | None |
| Course Objectives: | The purpose of the course is to familiarize the participants with the contemporary methods and techniques in inspection and evaluation and to enable them with the necessary strategies to channel these skills into educational settings. |
Learning Outcomes
|
The students who have succeeded in this course; I. Students will discuss and internalize the concept of planning and evaluation. They will also get familiarize with the different types of evaluation II. Students will learn approaches and principles in planning and evaluation within the context of education III. Students will be able to implement institutional evaluation procedures IV. Students will learn and implement appraisal V. Students will get to know the qualities of the inspectors as well as develoing their interpersonal and human relations VI. Students will discuss the importance of the concepts of motivation, institutional climate and health within the context of education |
Course Content
| The course will focus on three major areas that are driving the current evaluation and assessment movement in education: institutional performance; teaching and learning; and student learning and development. In so doing, this course will provide students with theoretical frameworks for understanding evaluation as well as the necessary quantitative and qualitative tools to design and provide valid and reliable empirically-based evidence. The course will also focus on how such evidence is used to evaluate and inform institutional policy as well as strategies for continuous improvement. |
Weekly Detailed Course Contents
| Week | Subject | Related Preparation |
| 1) | Types of inspection | |
| 2) | The concept of evaluation and inspection: Definition and Scope (Dimensions) | |
| 3) | Approaches and Principles of Inspection | |
| 4) | School inspection and evaluation | |
| 5) | Inspecting Administrative Processes | |
| 6) | Inspecting teaching and in class processes | |
| 7) | Evaluating Teacher Performance | |
| 8) | Inspectors Qualities: Role, Responsibility, Behaviour and Process | |
| 9) | Leadership in Inspection | |
| 10) | Human Relations in Inspection | |
| 11) | Mid Term | |
| 12) | Motivation and Morale in Inspection | |
| 13) | Inspection and School Climate, Culture and Health | |
| 14) | Değerlendirme and Mentoring |
Sources
| Course Notes / Textbooks: | Sergiovanni, Thomas J. and Robert J. Starrat.Supervision.(1993). Fifth Ed. New York: Mc Graw Hill |
| References: | Hoy, A.W.& W.K. Hoy.(2009). Instructional Leadership: A Research-based guide to learning in schools. 3rd edition. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Cogan, Morris. Clinical Supervision.(1973). Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Goldhammer, Robert., Robert Anderson and Robert J. Krajevsky. Clinical Supervision.(1980).2 d edi. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Hick, Hanne J. Educatuonal Supervision in Principle and Practice.(1960). Hopkins, W. Scott and Kenneth D. Moore. Clinical Supervision. (1993). Wisconsin: WCB Brown and Benchmark. Hoy, W. K.and P. B. Forsyth. Effective Supervision: Theory into Practice.(1986).New York: Random House . |
Evaluation System
| Semester Requirements | Number of Activities | Level of Contribution |
| Attendance | 14 | % 10 |
| Quizzes | 2 | % 15 |
| Homework Assignments | 2 | % 10 |
| Presentation | 1 | % 10 |
| Project | 1 | % 20 |
| Midterms | 1 | % 15 |
| Final | 1 | % 20 |
| Total | % 100 | |
| PERCENTAGE OF SEMESTER WORK | % 60 | |
| PERCENTAGE OF FINAL WORK | % 40 | |
| Total | % 100 | |
Contribution of Learning Outcomes to Programme Outcomes
| No Effect | 1 Lowest | 2 Low | 3 Average | 4 High | 5 Highest |
| Program Outcomes | Level of Contribution | |
| 1) | Being able to identify problems and ask right questions | |
| 2) | Having problem solving skills and developing necessary analytical attitude | |
| 3) | Comprehending theoretical arguments along with counter arguments in detail | |
| 4) | Gaining awareness of lifelong learning and being qualified for pursuing graduate education | |
| 5) | Applying theoretical concepts in project planning | |
| 6) | Communicating efficiently by accepting differences and carrying out compatible teamwork | |
| 7) | Increasing efficiency rate in business environment | |
| 8) | Developing innovative and creative solutions in face of uncertainty | |
| 9) | Researching to gather information for understanding current threats and opportunities in business | |
| 10) | Being aware of the effects of globalization on society and business while deciding | |
| 11) | Possessing digital competence and utilizing necessary technology | |
| 12) | Communicating in at least one foreign language in academic and daily life | |
| 13) | Possessing managing skills and competence | |
| 14) | Deciding with the awareness of the legal and ethical consequences of business operations | |
| 15) | Expressing opinions that are built through critical thinking process in business and academic environment |