| Week |
Subject |
Related Preparation |
| 1) |
Introduction |
|
| 2) |
Migration 101 |
S. Castles, de Haas, H., & Miller, M. J. (2014) The Age of Migration: International Population Movements in the Modern World 5th (fifth) Edition, Chapter 1, p. 1-20. |
| 3) |
European Union 101 & Area of Justice, Freedom and Security in the EU |
Marhold, H. (2016). The European “Area of Freedom, Security and Justice” : its evolution and three fundamental dilemmas. L'Europe en Formation, 3(3), 9-24. https://doi.org/10.3917/eufor.381.0009
Geddes, A., & Scholten, P. (2016). “Towards common European migration and asylum policies?” in The politics of migration and immigration in Europe. Sage.
Huysmans, J. (2000). The European Union and the securitization of migration. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 38(5), 751-777. |
| 4) |
Free movement of European citizens and Schengen |
Guild, E., Brouwer, E., Groenendijk, K., & Carrera, S. (2015). What is happening to the Schengen borders?. CEPS Paper in liberty and security in Europe, 86.
EUR-Lex, “The Schengen area and cooperation”, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=legissum%3Al33020
|
| 5) |
EU Entry/Exit System and the governance of external borders
|
Hess, S., & Kasparek, B. (2017). Under control? Or border (as) conflict: Reflections on the European border regime. Social Inclusion, 5(3), 58-68.
FRONTEX European Border and Coast Guard Agency: https://frontex.europa.eu/
Triandafyllidou, A., & Bartolini, L. (2020). Irregular Migration and Irregular Work: A Chicken and Egg Dilemma. In Migrants with Irregular Status in Europe (pp. 139-163). Springer, Cham.
Bigo, D. (2005). Frontier controls in the European Union: who is in control?. Controlling frontiers: Free movement into and within Europe, 49-99.
|
| 6) |
Labour and student migration to the EU |
Riaño, Y., Van Mol, C., & Raghuram, P. (2018). New directions in studying policies of international student mobility and migration. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 16(3), 283-294.
Consterdine, E., & Samuk, S. (2018). Temporary migration Programmes: The cause or antidote of migrant worker exploitation in UK agriculture. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 19(4), 1005-1020.
|
| 7) |
The EU asylum policy and the challenges against a Common European Asylum System |
Bauböck, R. (2018). Refugee protection and burden‐sharing in the European Union. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(1), 141-156.
EASO European Asylum Support Office: https://www.easo.europa.eu/
Carrera, S., Blockmans, S., Gros, D., & Guild, E. (2015). The EU's Response to the Refugee Crisis: Taking Stock and Setting Policy Priorities. CEPS essay, (20/16). |
| 8) |
MIDTERM EXAM |
|
| 9) |
Politicization of migration in the EU: public attitudes & political discourses |
Börzel, T. A., & Risse, T. (2018). From the euro to the Schengen crises: European integration theories, politicization, and identity politics. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(1), 83-108. |
| 10) |
Externalization of migration management & the relations with the non-EU countries |
Üstübici, A., & İçduygu, A. (2019). Border closures and the externalization of immigration controls in the Mediterranean: A comparative analysis of Morocco and Turkey. New Perspectives on Turkey, 60.
İçduygu, A., & Aksel, D. B. (2014). Two-to-tango in migration diplomacy: Negotiating readmission agreement between the EU and Turkey. European journal of migration and law, 16(3), 337-363.
|
| 11) |
Migration and asylum in the context of Turkey-EU relations
|
İçduygu, A. (2015). Turkey's evolving migration policies: A Mediterranean transit stop at the doors of the EU. Istituto affari internazionali.
İçduygu, A., & Aksel, D. B. (2013). Turkish migration policies: A critical historical retrospective. Perceptions, 18(3), 167.
|
| 12) |
Turkish citizens’ mobility in the EU |
Seçil Paçacı Elitok, “A Step Backward for Turkey?: The Readmission Agreement and the Hope of Visa Free Europe”, IPC Mercator Policy Brief, December 2015.
Karadağ, S. (2019). Extraterritoriality of European borders to Turkey: an implementation perspective of counteractive strategies. Comparative Migration Studies, 7(1), 1-16. |
| 13) |
Turkey-EU borders: “2015 crisis” and its aftermath |
İşleyen, B. (2018). Turkey’s governance of irregular migration at European Union borders: Emerging geographies of care and control. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 36(5), 849-866.
Öner, Selcen “Turkey as a Strategic Partner of the EU during the Refugee Crisis: The Challenges and Prospects”, Timofey Agarin and Nevena Nancheva (Eds), A European Crisis: Perspectives on Refugees, Solidarity and Europe, Stuttgart: ibidem-Verlag Pub., 2018.
Saatçioğlu, B. (2020). The European Union’s refugee crisis and rising functionalism in EU-Turkey relations. Turkish Studies, 21(2), 169-187.
Muftuler-Bac, M. (2020). Turkey and the European Union Refugee Deal: Assessing Turkish Migration Policies and the External Protection of European Borders. MAGYC project.
|
| 14) |
REVISION & Q/A SESSION |
|
| |
Program Outcomes |
Level of Contribution |
| 1) |
They acquire theoretical, historical and aesthetic knowledge specific to their field by using methods and techniques related to performing arts (acting, dance, music, etc.). |
2 |
| 2) |
They have knowledge about art culture and aesthetics and they provide the unity of theory and practice in their field. |
2 |
| 3) |
They are aware of national and international values in performing arts. |
2 |
| 4) |
Abstract and concrete concepts of performing arts; can transform it into creative thinking, innovative and original works. |
1 |
| 5) |
They have the sensitivity to run a business successfully in their field. |
3 |
| 6) |
Develops the ability to perceive, think, design and implement multidimensional from local to universal. |
3 |
| 7) |
They have knowledge about the disciplines that the performing arts field is related to and can evaluate the interaction of the sub-disciplines within their field. |
2 |
| 8) |
They develop the ability to perceive, design, and apply multidimensionality by having knowledge about artistic criticism methods. |
3 |
| 9) |
They can share original works related to their field with the society and evaluate their results and question their own work by using critical methods. |
1 |
| 10) |
They follow English language resources related to their field and can communicate with foreign colleagues in their field. |
1 |
| 11) |
By becoming aware of national and international values in the field of performing arts, they can transform abstract and concrete concepts into creative thinking, innovative and original works. |
3 |
| 12) |
They can produce original works within the framework of an interdisciplinary understanding of art. |
2 |
| 13) |
Within the framework of the Performing Arts Program and the units within it, they become individuals who are equipped to take part in the universal platform in their field. |
3 |
| 14) |
Within the Performing Arts Program, according to the field of study; have competent technical knowledge in the field of acting and musical theater. |
2 |
| 15) |
They use information and communication technologies together with computer software that is at least at the Advanced Level of the European Computer Use License as required by the field. |
3 |
BAHÇEŞEHİR UNIVERSITY BİLGİ PAKETİ / DERS KATALOĞU
