SOFTWARE ENGINEERING | |||||
Bachelor | TR-NQF-HE: Level 6 | QF-EHEA: First Cycle | EQF-LLL: Level 6 |
Course Code | Course Name | Semester | Theoretical | Practical | Credit | ECTS |
FTV3911 | Cinema and Dramaturgy I | Spring | 3 | 0 | 3 | 5 |
This catalog is for information purposes. Course status is determined by the relevant department at the beginning of semester. |
Language of instruction: | English |
Type of course: | Non-Departmental Elective |
Course Level: | Bachelor’s Degree (First Cycle) |
Mode of Delivery: | Face to face |
Course Coordinator : | Prof. Dr. NİLAY ULUSOY |
Course Objectives: | The objective of the course is to highlight the significance of questioning how cinema could make use of dramaturgy in scriptwriting shooting and editing. It is also to understand the tools of classical dramaturgy, develop dramaturgical perspective and insight. |
The students who have succeeded in this course; 1. Identify the basic concepts of dramaturgy. 2. Will be able to make use of dramaturgy during script writing. 3. Will be able to make use of dramaturgy during the shooting process. 4. Develop a dramaturgical perspective. 5. Will be able to critically analyze film productions using dramaturgical principles to identify strengths and areas for improvement. |
General content of the course are on understanding tragedy in its ancient to modern forms, understanding dramaturgical rules of classical Hollywood narrative cinema and developing an authentic dramaturgical perspective through the analysis of the films of Reha Erdem. In this course, instruction is delivered through interactive lectures, film screenings, group discussions, and case studies, while student performance is evaluated through written assignments, projects, and in-class participation. |
Week | Subject | Related Preparation |
1) | Historical Development of the concept of Dramatugy and the Function of dramaturgy | Readings on Aristotle, Lessing, Brecht, Boal ve Barba |
2) | Methods of Dramaturgy and dramaturgical perspective | Relationship between theatre dramaturgy and film dramaturgy |
3) | Basic Concepts of classical dramaturgy | Readings on Aristotles Poetics and King Oedipus |
4) | Reinterpretation of Poetics, Classical Narrative Hollywood Cinema | Spielberg's Jaws and Ibsen's Enemy of People |
5) | Tragedy and Shakespeare dramatugy | Reading Joseph Campbell's 'The Hero's Journey' and Hamlet |
6) | Ancient and modern tragedy | Elia Kazan film of A Streetcar Named Desire and Tennesse Williams readings |
7) | Klasik anlatı kavramları üzerinden film analizleri | |
8) | Narrative Theory, Russian Formalists | |
9) | Story- Plot- Structure relationship | |
10) | Story - Plot- Structure relationship: Discussions on a film: Oh Moon | Readings on Sevim Burak's Yanık Saraylar |
11) | Redefine the essential tools of classical narrative | A film of Reha Erdem: Korkuyorum Anne |
12) | Time and space | Time and Space in Reha Erdem's Hayat Var |
13) | Dramaturgical Coherence | Reha Erdem'in filmi Kosmos'un izlenemesi |
14) | An overview of dramaturgical perspectives by going over Reha erdem films |
Course Notes / Textbooks: | Here are the references in APA format: 1. Shakespeare, W. (2012). *Hamlet*. 2. Williams, T. (2009). *Arzu Tramvayı* (*A Streetcar Named Desire*). 3. Sophokles. (2012). *Kral Oidipus* (*Oedipus Rex*). 4. Aristoteles. (2011). *Poetika* (*Poetics*). 5. Genette, G. (2007). *Anlatının Söylemi: Yöntem Hakkında Bir Deneme* (*Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method*). 6. Bordwell, D. (1985). *Narration in the Fiction Film*. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. |
References: | Here are the references in APA format: 1. Shakespeare, W. (2012). *Hamlet*. 2. Williams, T. (2009). *Arzu Tramvayı* (*A Streetcar Named Desire*). 3. Sophokles. (2012). *Kral Oidipus* (*Oedipus Rex*). 4. Aristoteles. (2011). *Poetika* (*Poetics*). 5. Genette, G. (2007). *Anlatının Söylemi: Yöntem Hakkında Bir Deneme* (*Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method*). 6. Bordwell, D. (1985). *Narration in the Fiction Film*. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. |
Semester Requirements | Number of Activities | Level of Contribution |
Presentation | 2 | % 30 |
Midterms | 1 | % 30 |
Final | 1 | % 40 |
Total | % 100 | |
PERCENTAGE OF SEMESTER WORK | % 60 | |
PERCENTAGE OF FINAL WORK | % 40 | |
Total | % 100 |
Activities | Number of Activities | Duration (Hours) | Workload |
Course Hours | 14 | 3 | 42 |
Study Hours Out of Class | 12 | 3 | 36 |
Presentations / Seminar | 2 | 20 | 40 |
Midterms | 1 | 4 | 4 |
Final | 1 | 4 | 4 |
Total Workload | 126 |
No Effect | 1 Lowest | 2 Low | 3 Average | 4 High | 5 Highest |
Program Outcomes | Level of Contribution | |
1) | Be able to specify functional and non-functional attributes of software projects, processes and products. | |
2) | Be able to design software architecture, components, interfaces and subcomponents of a system for complex engineering problems. | |
3) | Be able to develop a complex software system with in terms of code development, verification, testing and debugging. | |
4) | Be able to verify software by testing its program behavior through expected results for a complex engineering problem. | |
5) | Be able to maintain a complex software system due to working environment changes, new user demands and software errors that occur during operation. | |
6) | Be able to monitor and control changes in the complex software system, to integrate the software with other systems, and to plan and manage new releases systematically. | |
7) | Be able to identify, evaluate, measure, manage and apply complex software system life cycle processes in software development by working within and interdisciplinary teams. | |
8) | Be able to use various tools and methods to collect software requirements, design, develop, test and maintain software under realistic constraints and conditions in complex engineering problems. | |
9) | Be able to define basic quality metrics, apply software life cycle processes, measure software quality, identify quality model characteristics, apply standards and be able to use them to analyze, design, develop, verify and test complex software system. | |
10) | Be able to gain technical information about other disciplines such as sustainable development that have common boundaries with software engineering such as mathematics, science, computer engineering, industrial engineering, systems engineering, economics, management and be able to create innovative ideas in entrepreneurship activities. | 4 |
11) | Be able to grasp software engineering culture and concept of ethics and have the basic information of applying them in the software engineering and learn and successfully apply necessary technical skills through professional life. | 3 |
12) | Be able to write active reports using foreign languages and Turkish, understand written reports, prepare design and production reports, make effective presentations, give clear and understandable instructions. | |
13) | Be able to have knowledge about the effects of engineering applications on health, environment and security in universal and societal dimensions and the problems of engineering in the era and the legal consequences of engineering solutions. | 3 |