ISL5630 Decision Making and Governance in Business EnvironmentBahçeşehir UniversityDegree Programs MBA (TURKISH, THESIS)General Information For StudentsDiploma SupplementErasmus Policy StatementNational QualificationsBologna Commission
MBA (TURKISH, THESIS)
Master TR-NQF-HE: Level 7 QF-EHEA: Second Cycle EQF-LLL: Level 7

Course Introduction and Application Information

Course Code Course Name Semester Theoretical Practical Credit ECTS
ISL5630 Decision Making and Governance in Business Environment Fall 3 0 3 8
This catalog is for information purposes. Course status is determined by the relevant department at the beginning of semester.

Basic information

Language of instruction: Turkish
Type of course: Departmental Elective
Course Level:
Mode of Delivery: Face to face
Course Coordinator : Prof. Dr. FATMA ÖZKUL
Course Lecturer(s): Dr. Öğr. Üyesi AHMET NACİ ÜNAL
Dr. Öğr. Üyesi FAHRİYE OBEN ÜRÜ SANI
Dr. Öğr. Üyesi OKAN YAŞAR
Dr. Öğr. Üyesi AHMET GÖKHAN ACAR
Recommended Optional Program Components: None
Course Objectives: Managerial and technical problems encountered in this course, the solution of business decision-making is aimed to help inform students about the various decision-making techniques.

Learning Outcomes

The students who have succeeded in this course;
1) Decision making criterion
2) Quality of individual and group decisions
3) Identifing problems
4) Analysing of the reasons of problems
5) Determination of solution alternatives
6) Designation of suitable solution alternatives

Course Content

Definition of decision making, goodness of decision, emotional and intiutional decision, concept of time, management and administration, decisions of individual and group, determination of problems and solutions to problems, techniques used in making desicion.

Weekly Detailed Course Contents

Week Subject Related Preparation
1) Introduction to make decision
2) Factors affecting the goodness of a decision
3) Emotional and intiutional decision
4) Concepts of management and administration
5) Individual desicions, decisions of groups, advantages and disadvantages
6) Determination of problems and reasons of problems
7) Midterm Exam
8) Techniques of Pareto Analysing
9) Analysing of reasons and results
10) Determination of solution alternatives
11) Determination of the most suitable solution alternatives
12) Election matrix with multiple criterion, matrix of priority determination
13) Feasibility, face to face and financial analysis
14) Swot analysis, techniques of decision tree

Sources

Course Notes / Textbooks: 1- İmrek, M, K., ?Yöneticiler İçin Karar Verme Teknikleri El Kitabı?, Bata yayınları, İstanbul, 2003.
2- Kalaycı, N., ? Karar Verme ve Problem Çözme?, Gazi kitabevi, Ankara, 2000
References: 1- İmrek, M, K., ?Yöneticiler İçin Karar Verme Teknikleri El Kitabı?, Bata yayınları, İstanbul, 2003.
2- Kalaycı, N., ? Karar Verme ve Problem Çözme?, Gazi kitabevi, Ankara, 2000

Evaluation System

Semester Requirements Number of Activities Level of Contribution
Attendance 14 % 10
Project 1 % 20
Midterms 1 % 30
Final 1 % 40
Total % 100
PERCENTAGE OF SEMESTER WORK % 40
PERCENTAGE OF FINAL WORK % 60
Total % 100

ECTS / Workload Table

Activities Number of Activities Workload
Course Hours 14 42
Application 13 48
Study Hours Out of Class 14 81
Midterms 1 2
Final 1 2
Total Workload 175

Contribution of Learning Outcomes to Programme Outcomes

No Effect 1 Lowest 2 Low 3 Average 4 High 5 Highest
           
Program Outcomes Level of Contribution
1) Being able to develop and deepen their knowledge at the level of expertise in the same or a different field, based on undergraduate level qualifications. 5
2) To be able to comprehend the interdisciplinary interaction with which the field is related. 4
3) To be able to use the theoretical and applied knowledge at the level of expertise acquired in the field. 4
4) To be able to interpret and create new knowledge by integrating the knowledge gained in the field with the knowledge from different disciplines, 4
5) To be able to solve the problems encountered in the field by using research methods. 5
6) To be able to systematically transfer current developments in the field and their own studies to groups in and outside the field, in written, verbal and visual forms, by supporting them with quantitative and qualitative data. 4
7) To be able to critically examine social relations and the norms that guide these relations, to develop them and take action to change them when necessary. 4
8) To be able to critically evaluate the knowledge and skills acquired in the field of expertise and to direct their learning. 5
9) To be able to supervise and teach these values by observing social, scientific, cultural and ethical values in the stages of collecting, interpreting, applying and announcing the data related to the field. 5
10) To be able to develop strategy, policy and implementation plans in the fields related to the field and to evaluate the obtained results within the framework of quality processes. 4
11) To be able to use the knowledge, problem solving and/or application skills they have internalized in their field in interdisciplinary studies. 5
12) Being able to independently carry out a work that requires expertise in the field. 3
13) To be able to develop new strategic approaches for the solution of complex and unpredictable problems encountered in applications related to the field and to produce solutions by taking responsibility. 5
14) Ability to lead in environments that require solving problems related to the field 5