Week |
Subject |
Related Preparation |
1) |
Entrance Week
|
|
2) |
Historical Background of European Values / Integration
|
|
3) |
The European System of States
|
|
4) |
European Values and Their Modern Age
|
|
5) |
Two Driving Strengths of Integration: Enlargement, Deepening
|
|
6) |
EU Institutions
|
|
7) |
EU Policies
|
|
8) |
European Integration in the light of International Relations Theories
|
|
9) |
Rational, Reflectivist and Socialist Approaches
|
|
10) |
European Integration Theories
|
|
11) |
Explanation of Integration
|
|
12) |
Management Analysis
|
|
13) |
Construction of EU
|
|
14) |
general evaluation
|
|
15) |
FINAL EXAM |
|
Course Notes / Textbooks: |
2.NezihaMUSAOĞLU, Uğur ÖZGÖKER, 2013, AVRUPA KİMLİĞİ KURGUSU, Paradigma Akademi Yayınları, İstanbul3.F.H. Burak ERDENİR, 2010,
AVRUPA KİMLİĞİ: AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ’NİN YARIM KALAN HİKAYESİ, Alfa, İstanbul4.Georges-Henri SOUTOU, 2014,
AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ TARİHİ 1815’ten Günümüze, (Çev.Eylem ALP), Bilge Kültür Sanat, İstanbul
|
References: |
|
|
Program Outcomes |
Level of Contribution |
1) |
Ability to develop and deepen their knowledge at the level of expertise in the same or a different field, based on undergraduate qualifications. |
3 |
2) |
Being able to comprehend the interdisciplinary interaction with which the field is related. |
3 |
3) |
Have the knowledge of the political, economic, and juridical foundation of the state. |
3 |
4) |
To develop and deepen the information level of expertise Master’s Degree on the basis of qualifications at the Political Science and International Relations Program. |
4 |
5) |
To have social, scientific and ethical values under all circumstances during the data collection, interpretation and dissemination stages related to the field of International Relations and Politics. |
4 |
6) |
Have a good formation of the social sciences |
5 |
7) |
To examine and evaluate countries and regions at the international level which are embedded in practical and theoretical knowledge. |
5 |
8) |
Have the knowledge of foreign policy formation and decision-making process. |
3 |
10) |
Evaluated to be critical of a variety of security issues, strategies, and practical consequences in the international arena.
|
5 |
11) |
Have a critical perspective on concepts, arguments, and current issues. |
4 |
12) |
Ability to independently carry out a study that requires expertise in the field. |
5 |
13) |
Ability to provide leadership in environments that require solving problems related to the field. |
4 |