ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING | |||||
Bachelor | TR-NQF-HE: Level 6 | QF-EHEA: First Cycle | EQF-LLL: Level 6 |
Course Code | Course Name | Semester | Theoretical | Practical | Credit | ECTS |
GEP0824 | Modern Logic | Spring Fall |
3 | 0 | 3 | 5 |
The course opens with the approval of the Department at the beginning of each semester |
Language of instruction: | En |
Type of course: | GE-Elective |
Course Level: | Bachelor |
Mode of Delivery: | Face to face |
Course Coordinator : | Dr. BURCU ALARSLAN ULUDAŞ |
Course Objectives: | To make students to be acquainted with the subject-matters and concepts of modern logic and to learn the way of thinking about those subject-matters and concepts. |
The students who have succeeded in this course; After successfully completing this course the student will be able •Recognises problems of modern logic. •Identifies the relation of modern logic and other disciplines. •Tells the difference between modern and classic logic. •Correlates between logic and mathematics. •Tells proposition and reasoning by symbols. |
Modern logic, Logic of truth function, Method of formal inference, Quantification logic, Philosophy of logic. |
Week | Subject | Related Preparation | |
1) | Introduction | ||
2) | Introduction to modern logic | Course notes | |
3) | Logic of truth function | Course notes | |
4) | Logic of truth function | Course notes | |
5) | Logic of truth function | Course notes | |
6) | Method of formal inference | Course notes | |
7) | Method of formal inference | Course notes | |
8) | Quantification logic | Course notes | |
9) | Quantification logic | Course notes | |
10) | Axiomatic method | Course notes | |
11) | Axiomatic method | Course notes | |
12) | Problems about logic | Course notes | |
13) | Philosophy, science, logic | Course notes | |
14) | Philosophy of logic | Course notes |
Course Notes: | |
References: | Doğan Özlem, Mantık, İstanbul 1996 Cemal Yıldırım, Mantık ‘Doğru Düşünme Yöntemi’ Bilgi yayınevi Teo Grunberg, Sembolik Mantık, El Kitabı, ODTÜ Geliştirme Vakfı Yayıncılık |
Semester Requirements | Number of Activities | Level of Contribution |
Attendance | 14 | % 10 |
Laboratory | % 0 | |
Application | % 0 | |
Field Work | % 0 | |
Special Course Internship (Work Placement) | % 0 | |
Quizzes | % 0 | |
Homework Assignments | 2 | % 20 |
Presentation | % 0 | |
Project | % 0 | |
Seminar | % 0 | |
Midterms | 1 | % 20 |
Preliminary Jury | % 0 | |
Final | 1 | % 50 |
Paper Submission | % 0 | |
Jury | % 0 | |
Bütünleme | % 0 | |
Total | % 100 | |
PERCENTAGE OF SEMESTER WORK | % 50 | |
PERCENTAGE OF FINAL WORK | % 50 | |
Total | % 100 |
Activities | Number of Activities | Duration (Hours) | Workload |
Course Hours | 14 | 3 | 42 |
Laboratory | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Application | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Special Course Internship (Work Placement) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Field Work | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Study Hours Out of Class | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Presentations / Seminar | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Project | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Homework Assignments | 2 | 10 | 20 |
Quizzes | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Preliminary Jury | 0 | ||
Midterms | 1 | 15 | 15 |
Paper Submission | 0 | ||
Jury | 0 | ||
Final | 1 | 20 | 20 |
Total Workload | 97 |
No Effect | 1 Lowest | 2 Low | 3 Average | 4 High | 5 Highest |
Program Outcomes | Level of Contribution | |
1) | Being able to describe the issues related with the scientific resources in the field of teaching, English language teaching and educational technologies within the national and international standards | |
2) | Proficient in the phonology, semantics, grammar and the vocabulary of the language; understand and use the language effectively. | |
3) | To improve students' reading, writing, listening and speaking skills, make use of various methods and techniques. | |
4) | Understand and apply theories and research in language acquisition and development to provide optimal learning environments in English language teaching. | |
5) | Locate and select appropriate software and technology resources for language teaching and use them effectively in and out of classroom. | |
6) | Use and generate measurement and assessment instruments to evaluate language knowledge and skills in an effective way and assess students’ knowledge using multiple measures and alternative assessment techniques. |