COMPUTER EDUCATION AND INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES | |||||
Bachelor | TR-NQF-HE: Level 6 | QF-EHEA: First Cycle | EQF-LLL: Level 6 |
Course Code | Course Name | Semester | Theoretical | Practical | Credit | ECTS |
GEP0822 | Logic I | Spring | 3 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
The course opens with the approval of the Department at the beginning of each semester |
Language of instruction: | En |
Type of course: | GE-Elective |
Course Level: | Bachelor |
Mode of Delivery: | Face to face |
Course Coordinator : | Dr. BURCU ALARSLAN ULUDAŞ |
Course Objectives: | Tomakestudentsto be acquaintedwithsubject-mattersandconcepts of logicandtolearntheway of thinking on thosesubject-mattersandconcepts. |
The students who have succeeded in this course; Thestudentswhosucceeded in thiscourse; Aftersuccessfullycompletingthiscoursethestudentwill be able •Recognises main problems of logic •Explainstherelationbetweenclassiclogicandotherdisciplines •Identify main concepts of philosophyandrelationbetweenthem. •Thinkscorrectandconsistently. •Describestheconceptfully. •Improvesmentalexecution. |
Concept, definition, predicables, proposition, reasoning, fallacies. |
Week | Subject | Related Preparation | |
1) | Definition of logic, arguments in daily life | Course notes | |
2) | Logicalvalidity | Course notes | |
3) | Reasoning | Course notes | |
4) | Short history of logic | Course notes | |
5) | Language andsentence | Course notes | |
6) | Meaning and truth value | Course notes | |
7) | Sentences and relation ship between them | Course notes | |
8) | Standard form | Course notes | |
9) | Direct and indirect arguments | Course notes | |
10) | Predicate logic | Course notes | |
11) | Sentences form in predicatelogic | Course notes | |
12) | Translations | Course notes | |
13) | Modal sentences | Course notes | |
14) | Modal reasoning | Course notes |
Course Notes: | Mantık (Doğru düşünme yöntemi), Cemal Yıldırım, Bilgi Yayınevi, 1999. Önermeler Mantığı, Ali Nesin, Nesin Yayıncılık, 2011. |
References: | Klasik Mantığa Giriş, İbrahim Emiroğlu, Ankara 2004, Klasik Mantık, NecatiÖner, Ankara 1991 Gazali’nin Mantık Anlayışı,İbrahimÇapak, Ankara 2005 |
Semester Requirements | Number of Activities | Level of Contribution |
Attendance | 14 | % 10 |
Laboratory | % 0 | |
Application | % 0 | |
Field Work | % 0 | |
Special Course Internship (Work Placement) | % 0 | |
Quizzes | % 0 | |
Homework Assignments | 2 | % 20 |
Presentation | % 0 | |
Project | % 0 | |
Seminar | % 0 | |
Midterms | 1 | % 20 |
Preliminary Jury | % 0 | |
Final | 1 | % 50 |
Paper Submission | % 0 | |
Jury | % 0 | |
Bütünleme | % 0 | |
Total | % 100 | |
PERCENTAGE OF SEMESTER WORK | % 50 | |
PERCENTAGE OF FINAL WORK | % 50 | |
Total | % 100 |
Activities | Number of Activities | Duration (Hours) | Workload |
Course Hours | 14 | 3 | 42 |
Laboratory | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Application | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Special Course Internship (Work Placement) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Field Work | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Study Hours Out of Class | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Presentations / Seminar | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Project | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Homework Assignments | 2 | 10 | 20 |
Quizzes | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Preliminary Jury | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Midterms | 1 | 15 | 15 |
Paper Submission | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Jury | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Final | 1 | 20 | 20 |
Total Workload | 97 |
No Effect | 1 Lowest | 2 Low | 3 Average | 4 High | 5 Highest |
Program Outcomes | Level of Contribution | |
1) | To define concepts related to the latest knowledge, tools and other scientific resources for the teaching profession, educational technology and information technologies in terms of national and international standards. | 4 |
2) | To explain the main elements of teaching strategies, methods and techniques, material design and assessment and evaluation processes that affect the development of educational technology integration. | |
3) | To develop competencies related to software languages, operating systems, computer networks and computer hardware. | |
3) | To use the most appropriate curriculum frameworks to plan lessons and activities based on active and student-centered learning integrated with technology. | |
4) | To use the most appropriate curriculum frameworks to plan lessons and activities based on active and student-centered learning integrated with technology. | |
5) | To plan, implement and evaluate classroom activities that utilize cutting-edge technologies to foster creativity, problem solving and critical thinking using scientific methods. | |
6) | To build strong theoretical and applied models to develop solutions to problems that focus on systems and human development within a learning organization. | 4 |
7) | To review, evaluate and recommend strategies for technology integration based on the interests, needs, individual differences and developmental characteristics of students in primary and secondary education. | |
8) | To work individually and collaboratively in a team to carry out activities related to educational technology, information technology and the teaching profession in an interdisciplinary approach. | 4 |
9) | To effectively use and evaluate educational technologies and appropriately designed instructional models as a means of achieving and meeting learning objectives and requirements. | |
10) | To utilize effective metacognitive techniques to make the classroom a community of learners engaged in lifelong learning activities. | |
11) | To prepare trainings and projects related to educational technology for the community and to provide counseling to individuals in enhancing learning through the appropriate use of technology. | 4 |
12) | To implement cost and time sensitive strategies to support individuals and organizations to carry out their work more effectively. | |
13) | To equip teachers to be pioneers and models in the application of technology for educational purposes using ethical and legal standards and to keep pace with changing technology. | |
14) | To investigate efficient design solutions and existing standards used today for educational technologies, curricula, innovations and outcomes related to work, school, education sector and virtual world. | |
15) | To gain fluency in interpersonal communication, teaching frameworks and the use of different technologies in relation to national norms and laws. | 4 |