|
Week |
Subject |
Related Preparation |
1) |
General information about the course |
Course syllabus |
2) |
Introduction to Fantastic Literary Theory
|
Pierre Jourde,ve Paolo Tortorese. "Fantastik: Mantık İçin Bir Skandal”. Çev. Esra Özdoğan, Kitap-lık. S. 66 (Kasım 2003): 79-81.
Nihayet Arslan, “Fantastik Nedir? “Yeni Bir Tür: 19.yüzyılda Fantastik:”, Nazlı Eray: Bir Okuma Denemesi, Ankara: Phonex, 2008: 5-20.
|
3) |
Fantastic Literary Theory
|
Tzvetan Todorov, Fantastik: Edebi Türe Yapısal Bir Yaklaşım. Çev. Nedret Tanyolaç Öztokat, İstanbul: Metis, 2004: 30-46, 47-63.
Jean-Luc. Steinmetz, “İzlekler,”Fantastik Edebiyat. Çev. Hasan Fehmi Nemli, İstanbul: Dost,
2006: 30-45.
|
4) |
Novel in Turkish Literature |
Güzin Dino, Türk Romanının Doğuşu. İstanbul: Cem Yayınları, 1978: 13-15.
Robert P. Finn, Türk Romanı (İlk Dönem 1872-1900), Çev. Tomris Uyar, İstanbul: Bilgi Yayınevi, 1984: 9-16.
Zeynep Uysal-Elkatip, “‘Modernleşen’ Türk Edebiyatına Bir Bakış.” Toplum ve Bilim. S. 81 (Yaz 1999): 127-137.
|
5) |
Discussing of Novel |
Hüseyin Rahmi Gürpınar, Ölüler Yaşıyor mu? |
6) |
Discussing of Novel and Film (From Literature to Cinema: Drakula İstanbul’da) |
Ali Rıza Seyfi, Drakula İstanbul’da |
7) |
Discussing of Novel |
Kerime Nadir, Dehşet Gecesi
Kaya Özkaracalar, “Türkiye’de Gotik”, Gotik. İstanbul: L&M Yayınları, 2005: 62-78.
|
8) |
Discussing of Novel |
Süleyman Seyfi Öğün,“Türk Muhafazakârlığının Kültür Kökleri ve Peyami Safa’nın Yanılgısı”. Toplum ve Bilim. S. 74 (Güz 1997): 102-152
David Adams Leeming, Flights: Readings in Magic, Mysticism, Fantasy and Myth. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc., 1974: 3-10.
Peyami Safa, Matmazel Noraliya’nın Koltuğu
|
9) |
Fantasy in Today (From Literature to Cinema: Alice in Wonderland) |
Eric R. Rabkin, Fantastic Worlds: Myths, Tales and Stories. Toronto ve Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 1979: 3-26. |
10) |
Textual Analyzing |
Rosemary Jackson, Fantasy: The Literature of Subversion. London: Routledge, 2003: 1-10, 61-91, 171-180.
Ahmet Hamdi Tanpınar, “Abdullah Efendi’nin Rüyaları”
|
11) |
Textual Analyzing and Discussing of Film (From Literature to Cinema: Şahmaran) |
Sigmund Freud, Sanat ve Edebiyat. Çev. Emre Kapkın, Ayşe Tekşen Kapkın, İstanbul: Payel Yayınevi, 1999: 325-359.
Murathan Mungan, “Şahmeran’ın Bacakları” |
12) |
Discussing of Novel |
W. R. Irwin, The Game of Impossible: A Rhetoric of Fantasy. Urbana: University of
Illinois Press, 1976: 3-10, 89-100, 183-197.
Nazlı Eray, Aşkı Giyinen Adam
|
13) |
Discussing of Novel and Film (From Literature to Cinema: The Lord of the Rings ) |
Bülent Somay, “Freudo Baggins’in Motor Yolculuğu: Bir Psikanaliz Olarak Fantazi Edebiyatı”, Tarihin Bilinçdışı, İstanbul, Metis, 2003: 98-119. |
14) |
Discussing of Novel |
Brian Atterbery, The Fantasy Tradition in American Literature. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1980: 1-15.
David Adams Leeming, Flights: Readings in Magic, Mysticism, Fantasy and Myth. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc., 1974: 178-196, 258-261.
Barış Müstecaplıoğlu, Korkak ve Canavar
|
Course Notes: |
Pelin Aslan tarafından derlenen GEP 1210 kitabı
Hüseyin Rahmi Gürpınar, Ölüler Yaşıyor mu? İstanbul: Atlas Kitabevi, 1975.
Ali Rıza Seyfi, Drakula İstanbul’da, İstanbul: Kamer, 1997.
Kerime Nadir, Dehşet Gecesi, İstanbul: Sulhi Garan Matbaası, 1958.
Peyami Safa, Matmazel Noraliya’nın Koltuğu.
İstanbul: Ötüken Yayınevi, 1974.
Nazlı Eray, Aşkı Giyinen Adam, İstanbul: Doğan Kitap, 2001.
Barış Müstecaplıoğlu, Korkak ve Canavar, İstanbul: Metis, 2001.
|
References: |
David Sander, Fantastic Literature: A Critical Reader. London: Westport ve Connecticut, 2004.
Rosemary Jackson, Fantasy: The Literature of Subversion. London: Routledge, 2003.
Eric R. Rabkin, The Fantastic in Literature. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1977.
Tzvetan Todorov, Fantastik: Edebi Türe Yapısal Bir Yaklaşım. Çev. Nedret Tanyolaç Öztokat, İstanbul: Metis, 2004.
|
|
Program Outcomes |
Level of Contribution |
1) |
Be able to specify functional and non-functional attributes of software projects, processes and products. |
|
2) |
Be able to design software architecture, components, interfaces and subcomponents of a system for complex engineering problems. |
|
3) |
Be able to develop a complex software system with in terms of code development, verification, testing and debugging. |
|
4) |
Be able to verify software by testing its program behavior through expected results for a complex engineering problem. |
|
5) |
Be able to maintain a complex software system due to working environment changes, new user demands and software errors that occur during operation. |
|
6) |
Be able to monitor and control changes in the complex software system, to integrate the software with other systems, and to plan and manage new releases systematically. |
|
7) |
Be able to identify, evaluate, measure, manage and apply complex software system life cycle processes in software development by working within and interdisciplinary teams. |
|
8) |
Be able to use various tools and methods to collect software requirements, design, develop, test and maintain software under realistic constraints and conditions in complex engineering problems. |
|
9) |
Be able to define basic quality metrics, apply software life cycle processes, measure software quality, identify quality model characteristics, apply standards and be able to use them to analyze, design, develop, verify and test complex software system. |
|
10) |
Be able to gain technical information about other disciplines such as sustainable development that have common boundaries with software engineering such as mathematics, science, computer engineering, industrial engineering, systems engineering, economics, management and be able to create innovative ideas in entrepreneurship activities. |
|
11) |
Be able to grasp software engineering culture and concept of ethics and have the basic information of applying them in the software engineering and learn and successfully apply necessary technical skills through professional life. |
|
12) |
Be able to write active reports using foreign languages and Turkish, understand written reports, prepare design and production reports, make effective presentations, give clear and understandable instructions. |
|
13) |
Be able to have knowledge about the effects of engineering applications on health, environment and security in universal and societal dimensions and the problems of engineering in the era and the legal consequences of engineering solutions. |
|