|
Week |
Subject |
Related Preparation |
1) |
General information about the course |
Course syllabus |
2) |
Introduction to Fantastic Literary Theory
|
Pierre Jourde,ve Paolo Tortorese. "Fantastik: Mantık İçin Bir Skandal”. Çev. Esra Özdoğan, Kitap-lık. S. 66 (Kasım 2003): 79-81.
Nihayet Arslan, “Fantastik Nedir? “Yeni Bir Tür: 19.yüzyılda Fantastik:”, Nazlı Eray: Bir Okuma Denemesi, Ankara: Phonex, 2008: 5-20.
|
3) |
Fantastic Literary Theory
|
Tzvetan Todorov, Fantastik: Edebi Türe Yapısal Bir Yaklaşım. Çev. Nedret Tanyolaç Öztokat, İstanbul: Metis, 2004: 30-46, 47-63.
Jean-Luc. Steinmetz, “İzlekler,”Fantastik Edebiyat. Çev. Hasan Fehmi Nemli, İstanbul: Dost,
2006: 30-45.
|
4) |
Novel in Turkish Literature |
Güzin Dino, Türk Romanının Doğuşu. İstanbul: Cem Yayınları, 1978: 13-15.
Robert P. Finn, Türk Romanı (İlk Dönem 1872-1900), Çev. Tomris Uyar, İstanbul: Bilgi Yayınevi, 1984: 9-16.
Zeynep Uysal-Elkatip, “‘Modernleşen’ Türk Edebiyatına Bir Bakış.” Toplum ve Bilim. S. 81 (Yaz 1999): 127-137.
|
5) |
Discussing of Novel |
Hüseyin Rahmi Gürpınar, Ölüler Yaşıyor mu? |
6) |
Discussing of Novel and Film (From Literature to Cinema: Drakula İstanbul’da) |
Ali Rıza Seyfi, Drakula İstanbul’da |
7) |
Discussing of Novel |
Kerime Nadir, Dehşet Gecesi
Kaya Özkaracalar, “Türkiye’de Gotik”, Gotik. İstanbul: L&M Yayınları, 2005: 62-78.
|
8) |
Discussing of Novel |
Süleyman Seyfi Öğün,“Türk Muhafazakârlığının Kültür Kökleri ve Peyami Safa’nın Yanılgısı”. Toplum ve Bilim. S. 74 (Güz 1997): 102-152
David Adams Leeming, Flights: Readings in Magic, Mysticism, Fantasy and Myth. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc., 1974: 3-10.
Peyami Safa, Matmazel Noraliya’nın Koltuğu
|
9) |
Fantasy in Today (From Literature to Cinema: Alice in Wonderland) |
Eric R. Rabkin, Fantastic Worlds: Myths, Tales and Stories. Toronto ve Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 1979: 3-26. |
10) |
Textual Analyzing |
Rosemary Jackson, Fantasy: The Literature of Subversion. London: Routledge, 2003: 1-10, 61-91, 171-180.
Ahmet Hamdi Tanpınar, “Abdullah Efendi’nin Rüyaları”
|
11) |
Textual Analyzing and Discussing of Film (From Literature to Cinema: Şahmaran) |
Sigmund Freud, Sanat ve Edebiyat. Çev. Emre Kapkın, Ayşe Tekşen Kapkın, İstanbul: Payel Yayınevi, 1999: 325-359.
Murathan Mungan, “Şahmeran’ın Bacakları” |
12) |
Discussing of Novel |
W. R. Irwin, The Game of Impossible: A Rhetoric of Fantasy. Urbana: University of
Illinois Press, 1976: 3-10, 89-100, 183-197.
Nazlı Eray, Aşkı Giyinen Adam
|
13) |
Discussing of Novel and Film (From Literature to Cinema: The Lord of the Rings ) |
Bülent Somay, “Freudo Baggins’in Motor Yolculuğu: Bir Psikanaliz Olarak Fantazi Edebiyatı”, Tarihin Bilinçdışı, İstanbul, Metis, 2003: 98-119. |
14) |
Discussing of Novel |
Brian Atterbery, The Fantasy Tradition in American Literature. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1980: 1-15.
David Adams Leeming, Flights: Readings in Magic, Mysticism, Fantasy and Myth. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc., 1974: 178-196, 258-261.
Barış Müstecaplıoğlu, Korkak ve Canavar
|
Course Notes: |
Pelin Aslan tarafından derlenen GEP 1210 kitabı
Hüseyin Rahmi Gürpınar, Ölüler Yaşıyor mu? İstanbul: Atlas Kitabevi, 1975.
Ali Rıza Seyfi, Drakula İstanbul’da, İstanbul: Kamer, 1997.
Kerime Nadir, Dehşet Gecesi, İstanbul: Sulhi Garan Matbaası, 1958.
Peyami Safa, Matmazel Noraliya’nın Koltuğu.
İstanbul: Ötüken Yayınevi, 1974.
Nazlı Eray, Aşkı Giyinen Adam, İstanbul: Doğan Kitap, 2001.
Barış Müstecaplıoğlu, Korkak ve Canavar, İstanbul: Metis, 2001.
|
References: |
David Sander, Fantastic Literature: A Critical Reader. London: Westport ve Connecticut, 2004.
Rosemary Jackson, Fantasy: The Literature of Subversion. London: Routledge, 2003.
Eric R. Rabkin, The Fantastic in Literature. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1977.
Tzvetan Todorov, Fantastik: Edebi Türe Yapısal Bir Yaklaşım. Çev. Nedret Tanyolaç Öztokat, İstanbul: Metis, 2004.
|
|
Program Outcomes |
Level of Contribution |
1) |
To learn and compare major sociology perspectives, both classical and contemporary, and apply all of them to analysis of social conditions. |
|
2) |
To be able to identify the basic methodological approaches in building sociological and anthropological knowledge at local and global levels |
|
3) |
To be able to use theoretical and applied knowledge acquired in the fields of statistics in social sciences. |
|
4) |
To have a basic knowledge of other disciplines (including psychology, history, political science, communication studies and literature) that can contribute to sociology and to be able to make use of this knowledge in analyzing sociological processes |
|
5) |
To have a knowledge and practice of scientific and ethical principles in collecting, interpreting and publishing sociological data also develop ability how to share this data with experts and lay people, using effective communication skills |
|
6) |
To develop competence in analyzing and publishing sociological knowledge by using computer software for quantitative and qualitative analysis; and develop an attitute for learning new techniques in these fields. |
|
7) |
To identify and to have a knowledge of the theories related to urban and rural sociology and demography, and political sociology, sociology of gender, sociology of body, visual sociology, sociology of work, sociology of religion, sociology of knowledge and sociology of crime. |
|
8) |
To have knowledge of how sociology is positioned as a scientific discipline from a philosophical and historical perspective |
|
9) |
To have the awareness of social issues in Turkish society, to develop critical perspective in analysing these issues and to have a knowledge of the works of Turkish sociologists and to be able to transfer this knowledge |
|
10) |
To have the awareness of social issues and global societal processes and to apply sociological analysis to development and social responsibility projects |
|
11) |
To have the ability to define a research question, design a research project and complete a written report for various fields of sociology, either as an individual or as a team member. |
|
12) |
To be able to transfer the knowledge gained in the areas of sociology to the level of secondary school. |
|