ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING
Bachelor TR-NQF-HE: Level 6 QF-EHEA: First Cycle EQF-LLL: Level 6

Course Introduction and Application Information

Course Code Course Name Semester Theoretical Practical Credit ECTS
GEP0414 Ottoman Turkish II Spring 3 0 3 4
The course opens with the approval of the Department at the beginning of each semester

Basic information

Language of instruction: Tr
Type of course: GE-Elective
Course Level: Bachelor
Mode of Delivery:
Course Coordinator : Dr. BURCU ALARSLAN ULUDAŞ
Course Lecturer(s): Prof. Dr. NEJDET ÖZTÜRK
Course Objectives: Ottoman Turkish II course is designed to teach upper intermediate and advanced Ottoman Turkish through both a wide and rich range of typefaces such as “nesih”, “divani”, “talik” “rik’a” through “manucsript documents” and technical knowledge of Ottoman Turkish grammar.

Learning Outputs

The students who have succeeded in this course;
To recognize and read printed and manuscript texts,
To learn Arabic and Persian components in historical documents,
To be familiar with the typefaces that are used in Ottoman Turkish
To comprehend the significance of Ottoman Turkish in order to use arhives and libareries to research on Ottoman History

Course Content

Arabic and Persian elements; active and passive ones, infinitives and their kinds, suffix and infinitives affixed to initial and end of words, numbers, dictionary studies, reading and translation of printed texts.

Weekly Detailed Course Contents

Week Subject Related Preparation
1) “Barbaros Hayreddin Paşa” (Cevdet Paşa, Tarih-i Cevdet)
2) “Barbaros Hayreddin Paşa” (Cevdet Paşa, Tarih-i Cevdet)
3) “Barbaros Hayreddin Paşa” (Cevdet Paşa, Tarih-i Cevdet)
4) “Ulemâya Dâir” * İsm-i fâ‘il, İsm-i mef‘ûl (Koçi Bey Risâlesi’nden)
5) “16. Yüzyılın Siyaset Bilimcisi Lütfi Paşa’nın Devlet Adamlarına Tavsiyeleri” * Aksâm-ı seb‘a. (Lütfi Paşa, Âsafnâme)
6) “16. Yüzyılın Siyaset Bilimcisi Lütfi Paşa’nın Devlet Adamlarına Tavsiyeleri”– *Aksâm-ı seb‘a. (Lütfi Paşa, Âsafnâme)
7) “İstanbul’da Çarşı ve Pazarların Düzeni Hakkında” *Sıfat-ı müşebbehe, İsm-i tafdîl, Arapça ve Farsça edatlar. (Anonim, Kitâb-ı Mesâlih)
8) “Evliyâ Çelebi’ye Göre Amasya”- *Arapça ay ve gün adları, Sayılar
9) “Pîrî Reis’e Göre Bozcaada” (Pîrî Reis, Kitâb-ı Bahriye)
10) “Yazı ve Belge Çeşitlerine Dair Örnek Metinler I”; El yazması eser tanıtımı. *Arapça ve Farsça tamlamalar - Ebced hesabı, Mekân ve zaman isimleri vb.
11) “Yazı ve Belge Çeşitlerine Dair Örnek Metinler I”; El yazması eser tanıtımı. *Arapça ve Farsça tamlamalar - Ebced hesabı, Mekân ve zaman isimleri vb.
12) “Yazı ve Belge Çeşitlerine Dair Örnek Metinler I”; El yazması eser tanıtımı. *Arapça ve Farsça tamlamalar - Ebced hesabı, Mekân ve zaman isimleri vb.
13) Oruç Bey yazmalarına göre Ankara Savaşı (1402).
14) Âşık Paşazade, Neşrî,

Sources

Course Notes: Okutulacak metinlerin kaynakları ayraç içerisinde gösterilmiştir.
References:

Evaluation System

Semester Requirements Number of Activities Level of Contribution
Attendance 14 % 7
Laboratory % 0
Application % 0
Field Work % 0
Special Course Internship (Work Placement) % 0
Quizzes % 0
Homework Assignments 8 % 8
Presentation % 0
Project % 0
Seminar % 0
Midterms 1 % 40
Preliminary Jury % 0
Final 1 % 45
Paper Submission % 0
Jury % 0
Bütünleme % 0
Total % 100
PERCENTAGE OF SEMESTER WORK % 55
PERCENTAGE OF FINAL WORK % 45
Total % 100

ECTS / Workload Table

Activities Number of Activities Duration (Hours) Workload
Course Hours 14 3 42
Laboratory 0 0 0
Application 1 5 5
Special Course Internship (Work Placement) 0 0 0
Field Work 0 0 0
Study Hours Out of Class 0 0 0
Presentations / Seminar 0 0 0
Project 0 0 0
Homework Assignments 8 3 24
Quizzes 3 2 6
Preliminary Jury 0
Midterms 1 10 10
Paper Submission 0
Jury 0
Final 1 10 10
Total Workload 97

Contribution of Learning Outcomes to Programme Outcomes

No Effect 1 Lowest 2 Low 3 Average 4 High 5 Highest
           
Program Outcomes Level of Contribution
1) 1.Being able to describe the issues related with the scientific resources in the field of teaching, English language teaching and educational technologies within the national and international standards.
2) 2.Proficient in the phonology, semantics, grammar and the vocabulary of the language, use the language effectively.
3) 3. Apply theories and research in language acquisition and development to provide optimal learning environments in English language teaching.
4) 4. develop English language teaching materials according to the needs of the learners with a critical perspective.
5) 5. Use appropriate software and technology resources for language teaching effectively in and out of classroom by locating and selecting them.
6) 6. To improve students' reading, writing, listening and speaking skills, make use of various methods and techniques.
7) 7. Design English language teaching curriculum and lesson plans.
8) 8. Organize effective classrooms that promote English language learning.
9) 9. assess students’ knowledge using multiple measures and alternative assessment techniques in order to evaluate language knowledge and skills in an effective way by using and generating measurement and assessment instruments.
10) 10. Apply major concepts, principles, theories, and research related to the nature and role of culture and cultural groups to construct supportive learning environments and to promote inter-cultural effective communication and pragmatics skills.
11) 11. Take on responsibility in individual and group projects by working cooperatively and meeting the requirements
12) 12. Take into consideration professional and ethical rules and principles. 4
13) 13. Apply the pedagogical implications of the research in the field of English language teaching for his/her personal and professional development, by keeping up with the recent studies. 4
14) 14. Use reflective thinking and reflective teaching to examine his/her teaching skills and professional competencies. 5
15) 15. Transfer the knowledge and skills necessary for life-long learning to students by using metacognitive techniques with the knowledge of how to obtain information effectively. 5
16) 16. utilize learning strategies and technology resources by evaluating their relevance to K-12 students’ interests, needs, individual differences, and developmental characteristics.