ENDÜSTRİ 4.0 (İNGİLİZCE, TEZSİZ)
Yüksek Lisans TYYÇ: 7. Düzey QF-EHEA: 2. Düzey EQF-LLL: 7. Düzey

Ders Tanıtım Bilgileri

Ders Kodu Ders Adı Yarıyıl Teorik Pratik Kredi AKTS
POL4144 Toplumsal Cinsiyet Politikası Güz 3 0 3 6
Bu dersin açılması ilgili bölüm tarafından yarıyıl başında belirlenir

Temel Bilgiler

Öğretim Dili: En
Dersin Türü: Departmental Elective
Dersin Seviyesi: LİSANSÜSTÜ
Dersin Veriliş Şekli: Hibrit
Dersin Koordinatörü: Doç. Dr. ESRA ALBAYRAKOĞLU
Dersi Veren(ler): Doç. Dr. ZEYNEP HANDE PAKER UNCU
Dersin Amacı:

Öğrenme Çıktıları

Bu dersi başarıyla tamamlayabilen öğrenciler;

Dersin İçeriği

Haftalık Ayrıntılı Ders İçeriği

Hafta Konu Ön Hazırlık
1) Giriş
2) Temel kavramlar, teorik yaklaşımlar Okin ‘Gender, the Public, and the Private’ in Phillips, Feminism and Politics, Oxford University Press: 116-141. Mohanty, C. T. 2003. ‘Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses’, in Feminism Without Borders, Duke University Press: 17-42.
3) Toplumsal cinsiyet temelli vatandaşlık Walby, S. 1994. “Is Citizenship Gendered?”, Sociology, 28: 379- 395. Siim, B. 2008. ‘The Challenge of Recognizing Diversity from the Perspective of Gender Equality: Dilemmas in Danish Citizenship’, in B. Siim and J. Squires (eds.), Contesting Citizenship, London and New York: Routledge: 89-109.
4) Kadın Hakları Friedman, J. 2007. ‘Women, Islam and rights in Europe: beyond a universalist/culturalist dichotomy’, Review of International Studies, 33: 29-44. Bovarnick, S. 2007. ‘Universal human rights and non-Western normative systems: a comparative analysis of violence against women in Mexico and Pakistan’, Review of International Studies, 33, 1: 59-74. Gökarıksel, B. (2012). The intimate politics of secularism and the headscarf: The mall, the neighborhood, and the public square in Istanbul. Gender, Place & Culture, 19(1), 1-20
5) Skjeie, H. 2008. ‘Religious Exemptions to Equality’, in B. Siim and J. Squires (eds.), Contesting Citizenship, London and New York: Routledge: 69-88. Fisher Onar, N. and H. Paker. 2012. ‘Towards Cosmopolitan Citizenship? Women’s Rights Organizations in Divided Turkey’, Theory and Society, 41, 4: 375-394. Hill Collins, P. and V. Chepp. 2013. ‘Intersectionality’ in G. Waylen, K. Celis, J. Kantola, S. L. Weldon (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Gender and Politics, OUP.
6) Phillips, A. ‘Democracy and Representation: Or, Why Should it Matter Who our Representatives Are?’, in Phillips, Feminism and Politics: 224-240. Mansbridge, J. 1999. ‘Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes’’, The Journal of Politics, 61, 3: 628-657. **Assignment 1 due**
7) Siyasi temsiliyet-eşitlik politikaları ve kotalar- II Crespi, I. 2009. ‘Gender differences and equality issues in Europe: critical aspects of gender mainstreaming policies’, International Review of Sociology, 19, 1: 171-188. Wängnerud, L. and A. Sundell. 2012. ‘Do politics Matter? Women in Swedish local elected assemblies 1970-2010 and gender equality in outcomes’, European Political Science Review, 4, 1: 97-120.
8) Moghadam, V. 2005. ‘Chapter 2: Globalization and Its Discontents: Capitalist Development, Political Movements, and Gender’, in Globalizing Women: Transnational Feminist Networks, Balitimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press: 21-49. Moghadam, V. 2005. ‘Chapter 4: The Women’s Movement and its Organizations: Discourses, Structures, Resources’, in Globalizing Women: Transnational Feminist Networks, Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press: 78-104.
9) Alternatif siyasi katılım biçimleri- kadın hareketi Amrita Basu, “Globalization of the Local/Localization of the Global: Mapping Transnational Women’s Movements,” Meridians 1.1 (2000): 68-84. Visual material: Makers: Women who Make America (asynchronized); summary/key figures/ key debates
10) Alternatif siyasi katılım biçimleri- Türkiye'de kadın hareketi ve devlet feminizmi Coşar, S. and F. Gençoğlu Onbaşı. 2008. ‘Women’s Movement in Turkey at a Crossroads: From Women’s Rights Advocacy to Feminism’, South European Society and Politics 13, 3: 325-344. Cagatay, Selin. 2018. “Women’s Coalitions beyond the Laicism–Islamism Divide in Turkey: Towards an Inclusive Struggle for Gender Equality?”, Social Inclusion 6(4), pp. 48-58. Arat, Y. 2000. ‘From emancipation to liberation: The changing role of women in Turkey’s public realm’, Journal of International Affairs, 54(1),107-123.
11) Arat, Y. 1997. ‘The Project of Modernity and Women in Turkey’, in S. Bozdoğan and R. Kasaba (eds.), Rethinking Modernity and National Identity in Turkey, Seattle and London, University of Washington Press: 95-112. Kandiyoti, D. 1997. ‘Gendering the Modern: On Missing Dimensions in the Study of Turkish Modernity’, in S. Bozdoğan and R. Kasaba (eds.), Rethinking Modernity and National Identity in Turkey, Seattle and London, University of Washington Press: 113-132. Doğangün, G. (2020). Gender climate in authoritarian politics: A comparative study of Russia and Turkey. Politics & Gender, 16(1), 258-284. Najmabadi, A. 1998. ‘Crafting an Educated Housewife in Iran’ in L. Abu-Lughod (ed.), Remaking Women, Feminism and Modernity in the Middle East, New Jersey: Princeton University Press: 91-125. Assignment 2 due**
12) Kadın bedeninini siyasallaştırmak Carroll, Susan J. 2009. “Reflections on Gender and Hillary Clinton’s Presidential Campaign: The Good, the Bad, and the Misogynic.” Politics & Gender 5 (1): 1-20. Parla, A. 2001. ‘The ‘Honor’ of the State: Virginity Examinations in Turkey’, Feminist Studies, 27,1: 65-88. İlkkaracan, P. ‘How Adultery Almost Derailed Turkey’s Aspiration to Join the European Union’, in R. Parker, R. Petchesky and R. Sember (eds.), Sex Politics, Reports from the Front Lines, Sexuality Policy Watch: 247-276. Chappell, L. ‘Interacting with the State: Feminist strategies and Political Opportunities’ in M. L. Krook and S. Childs (ed.), Women, Gender, and Politics: a Reader, Oxford university Press.
13) Glick, E. 2000. ‘Sex Positive: Feminism, Queer Theory, and the Politics of Transgression’ Feminist Review, 64 (1). Terriquez, V. 2015. ‘Intersectional mobilization, social movement spillover, and queer youth leadership in the immigrant rights movement’. Social Problems, 62(3), 343-362. Paternotte, D. 2016. ‘The NGOization of LGBT activism: ILGA-Europe and the Treaty of Amsterdam’. Social Movement Studies, 15(4), 388-402.
14) Genel değerlendirme
14) Tekrar ve genel değerlendirme

Kaynaklar

Ders Notları: Weekly readings will be uploaded on Teams at the beginning of the semester. Please note that all book chapters and articles listed on the syllabus are also accessible through the BAU Library. The PPT files will be shared on Teams following each class.
Diğer Kaynaklar: Mevcut Değil

Değerlendirme Sistemi

Yarıyıl İçi Çalışmaları Aktivite Sayısı Katkı Payı
Devam 14 % 20
Laboratuar % 0
Uygulama % 0
Arazi Çalışması % 0
Derse Özgü Staj % 0
Küçük Sınavlar % 0
Ödev 3 % 40
Sunum % 0
Projeler % 0
Seminer % 0
Ara Sınavlar % 0
Ara Juri % 0
Final 1 % 40
Rapor Teslimi % 0
Juri % 0
Bütünleme % 0
Toplam % 100
YARIYIL İÇİ ÇALIŞMALARININ BAŞARI NOTU KATKISI % 60
YARIYIL SONU ÇALIŞMALARININ BAŞARI NOTUNA KATKISI % 40
Toplam % 100

AKTS / İş Yükü Tablosu

Aktiviteler Aktivite Sayısı İş Yükü
Ders Saati 14 42
Laboratuvar
Uygulama
Derse Özgü Staj
Arazi Çalışması
Sınıf Dışı Ders Çalışması 14 70.5
Sunum / Seminer
Proje
Ödevler 3 36
Küçük Sınavlar
Ara Juri
Ara Sınavlar
Rapor Teslimi
Juri
Final 1 1.5
Toplam İş Yükü 150

Program ve Öğrenme Kazanımları İlişkisi

Etkisi Yok 1 En Düşük 2 Düşük 3 Orta 4 Yüksek 5 En Yüksek
           
Dersin Program Kazanımlarına Etkisi Katkı Payı