|
Week |
Subject |
Related Preparation |
1) |
Introduction |
|
2) |
Approaches to power and the political |
|
3) |
Development of the state |
*Huber et al. 2015. “Introduction: Transformations of the state”, in S. Liebfried, E. Huber, M. Lange, J. D. Levy, F. Nullmeier (eds), The Oxford handbook of Transformations of the State, Oxford University Press: p. 1-22.
Mann, M. 1993. The Sources of Social Power, Vol. 2. Cambridge University Press: p. 444-478
|
4) |
Theories of the state-I : class and contestation |
*Dahl, R. 1971. Polyarchy. Yale University Press: p. 1-32. |
5) |
Theories of the state- II : state as autonomous actor |
*Skocpol, T. 1985. “Bringing the State Back In: Strategies of Analysis in Current Research,” in P. Evans, D. Rueschemeyer and T. Skocpol, ed.s, Bringing the State Back In, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: p. 3-37.
Wang, X. 1999. “Mutual Empowerment of State and Society. Its Nature, Conditions, Mechanisms, and Limits”, Comparative Politics, 31: 231-249.
|
6) |
Theories of the state III: can the state be green? |
*Eckersley, R. (2006). From the liberal to the green democratic state: upholding autonomy and sustainability. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 1(4), 266-283. |
7) |
Nations and national integration- I |
*Gellner, E. 1983. Nations and Nationalism. New York: Cornell University Press: p. 1-7, 19-38, 53-62. |
8) |
Nations and national integration- II |
*Guibernau, M. 2004. ‘Anthony D. Smith on nations and national identity: a critical assessment’, Nations and Nationalism, 10: 125-141. |
9) |
Capitalism and Democracy |
*Moore, B. 1966. Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Beacon Press: p. 3-39.
*Della Porta, D., 2013, ‘Ch. 4: Deliberative Democracy: Between Representation and Participation’, in Can Democracy Be Saved?, Polity Press: 60-84.
Lipset. 1994. “Social Requisites of Democracy”, American Sociological Review 59: -22.
Sunar, İ. and Sayarı, S. 1987. “Democracy in Turkey: Problems and Prospects”, in G. O’Donnell et al., Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Comparative Perspectives. John Hopkins University Press.: p. 65-95.
|
10) |
Civil Society and the state |
*Hall, J. A. 1995. “In Search of Civil Society,” in J. A. Hall, ed., Civil Society: Theory, History, Comparison, Cambridge, Polity Press: 1-31.
*Paker, H., & Keyman, E. F. 2020. State, Civil Society, and Syrians in Turkey. In Fostering Pluralism through Solidarity Activism in Europe (pp. 107-132). Palgrave Macmillan.
Migdal, J. S., A. Kohli and V. Shue. 1994. State Power and Social Forces. Cambridge University Press: 7-36.
|
11) |
Citizenship |
*Dobson, Andrew. 2003. Chapter 3: Three Types of Citizenship’ in Citizenship and the Environment, Oxford University Press: p. 33-41, 51-61.
*Baban, F., & Rygiel, K. 2017. ‘Living with others: fostering radical cosmopolitanism through citizenship politics in Berlin.’ Ethics & Global Politics, 10(1), 98-116.
Keyman, E. F. 2005. “Articulating citizenship and identity: The Kurdish Question in Turkey” in E. F. Keymanand A. İçduygu (eds.), Citizenship in a Global World: European Questions and Turkish Experiences, London and New york, Routledge:267-288.
|
12) |
Collective action |
*Della Porta, D. and M. Diani. 2006. “The Study of Social Movements: Recurring Questions, (Partially) Changing Answers”, in D. Della Porta and M. Diani (eds.), Social Movements, An Introduction, Blackwell Publishing: 1-29.
*Smith, J. 2007, “Transnational Processes and Movements”, in D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, and H.Kriesi (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, Blackwell: 311-335.
|
13) |
State, society and power in a globalizing world |
*Sklair, Leslie 2002. Globalization: capitalism and its alternatives. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing: 84-115. |
14) |
Review/general assessment of the course |
|
|
Program Outcomes |
Level of Contribution |
1) |
Grasp basic theoretical and conceptual knowledge about the field and relations between them at the level of practice. |
|
2) |
Possess basic knowledge about the causes and effects of political transformations in societies. |
|
3) |
Possess knowledge about quantitative, qualitative and mixed research methods in social and behavioral sciences. |
|
4) |
Recognize historical patterns while evaluating contemporary political and social developments. |
|
5) |
Demonstrate interdisciplinary and critical approach while analyzing, synthesizing and forecasting domestic and foreign policy. |
|
6) |
Conduct studies in the field professionally, both independently or as a team member. |
|
7) |
Possess consciousness about lifelong learning based on Research & Development. |
|
8) |
Communicate with peers both orally and in writing, by using a foreign language at least at a level of European Language Portfolio B1 General Level and the necessary informatics and communication technologies. |
|
9) |
Apply field-related knowledge and competences into career advancement, projects for sustainable development goals, and social responsibility initiatives. |
|
10) |
Possess the habit to monitor domestic and foreign policy agenda as well as international developments. |
|
11) |
Possess competence to interpret the new political actors, theories and concepts in a global era. |
|
12) |
Evaluate the legal and ethical implications of advanced technologies on politics. |
|