| ARCHITECTURE | |||||
| Bachelor | TR-NQF-HE: Level 6 | QF-EHEA: First Cycle | EQF-LLL: Level 6 | ||
| Course Code | Course Name | Semester | Theoretical | Practical | Credit | ECTS |
| ARC2002 | Architectural Design II | Spring | 2 | 6 | 5 | 10 |
| The course opens with the approval of the Department at the beginning of each semester |
| Language of instruction: | En |
| Type of course: | Must Course |
| Course Level: | Bachelor |
| Mode of Delivery: | Face to face |
| Course Coordinator : | Dr. Öğr. Üyesi DURNEV ATILGAN YAĞAN |
| Course Lecturer(s): |
Assoc. Prof. MEHMET BENGÜ ULUENGİN Dr. Öğr. Üyesi BELİNDA TORUS Dr. Öğr. Üyesi GÖKSUN AKYÜREK ALTÜRK Assoc. Prof. AYŞE İREM KIRIŞ Assoc. Prof. BÜLENT ONUR TURAN Instructor SITKI AHMET ERGELEN Dr. Öğr. Üyesi MEHMET TANSU ACIMERT Assoc. Prof. MELTEM VATAN Instructor EDA ERKAN Instructor BOĞAÇHAN DÜNDARALP Instructor MERİÇ ÜĞDÜL KATMERCİ Instructor İLHAN AYDIN MELTEM Dr. Öğr. Üyesi ALİ ÇİÇEK Dr. Öğr. Üyesi MİNE DİNÇER Dr. Öğr. Üyesi YİĞİT YILMAZ Instructor SEDA CİVELEK |
| Course Objectives: | The research based ARC2002 studio aims to explore housing as the main theme within the context of a settlement focusing on emerging problems of housing, social sustainability and inclusivity, keeping groups with vulnerabilities and specific housing challenges in mind. |
|
The students who have succeeded in this course; The students who complete this course, will be able to: (1) gather, assess, record, apply, and comparatively evaluate relevant information particular to housing, precedents and user groups. (2) understand the architect’s responsibility to work in the public interest, for social sustainability and inclusivity. (3) think critically of existing housing systems and propose alternative living environments. (4) make decisions related to site selection and survey of the place, to discover the characteristics of the place. (5) find out the relations, problems and potentials of the place and develop design assessment criteria (6) develop a scenario and architectural program for housing for users and their socio-spatial requirements (7) represent the work using different methods like sketches, diagrams, collages, drawings, video, models and digital modelling, etc. (8) produce a comprehensive architectural project that demonstrates each student’s capacity to make design decisions across scales. |
| ARC2002 studio starts with developing a critique of our existing housing environments. Both the basic right to appropriate housing and evolving needs of communities needs to be addressed. A community-led and administered living ensuring inclusivity, equity through bottom-up solutions born out of the locality of places and communities is envisioned. Students can decide to either work on one of the sites offered by the studio or propose one of their own relevant in size, scale and qualities like diversity of local-mix in socio-economics and multiculturalism. Students provide necessary documentation, maps, and research on the context of the site and administer their site survey, analysis and research according to their earlier experiences in ARC2001. Students define the theme, scenario, mix, weighting and architectural program of the housing proposal for the characteristics of their selected sites. Relation to the existing built environment, configuration of spaces, structure, technology and form are all issues to be considered in relation to the design process. |
| Week | Subject | Related Preparation | |
| 1) | 1a. Introduction 1b.Lectures, discussion and research on housing | ||
| 2) | 2a. Lectures, discussion and research on housing 2b. Lectures, discussion on site and community survey | ||
| 3) | 3a. & 3b. Lectures, discussion on site and community survey | ||
| 4) | 4a & 4b. Developing scenarios and architectural programs | ||
| 5) | 5a & 5b. Interim Jury I | ||
| 6) | 6a & 6b. Pin-ups & critiques | ||
| 7) | 7a & 7b. Pin-ups & critiques | ||
| 8) | 8a & 8b. Pin-ups & critiques | ||
| 9) | 9a & 9b. Interim Jury 2 | ||
| 10) | 10a & 10b. Pin-ups & critiques | ||
| 11) | 11a & 11b. Pin-ups & critiques | ||
| 12) | 12a & 12b. Pin-ups & critiques | ||
| 13) | 13a & 13b. Pre-final Jury | ||
| 14) | 14a & 14b. Critics on final presentation | ||
| Course Notes: | Will be given according to the project topic. |
| References: | • Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S. & Silverstein, M. (1977). A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction. New York: Oxford University Press. • Brillembourg, A. (2012). Torre David: Informal Vertical Communities. Zürich: Lars Müller Publishers. • Crase, J., Crawford, M., Kaliski, J. (Eds.) (1999). Everyday Urbanism. New York: Monacelli Press. • Davis, M. (2006). Planet of Slums. London: Verso. • De Chiara, J., Panero, J. & Zelnik, M. (Eds.) (2001). Time-Saver Standards for Interior Design and Space Planning. New York: Mc Graw-Hill. • Dove, C. (2020). Radical Housing-Designing multi-generational and co-living housing for all. London: RIBA Publishing. • Harvey, D. (2012). Rebel Cities: From the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution. London: Verso. • Interior Space: Permanent and Temporary Exhibition. (2007). Seoul, Korea: Archiworld. • Lepik, A. (2010). Small Scale, Big Change: New Architectures of Social Engagement. New York: The Museum of Modern Art. • Panero, J. & Zelnik, M. (1979). Human Dimension & Interior Space: A Source Book of Design Reference Standards. New York: Whitney Library of Design. • Sarkissian, W., Hofer, N., Shore, Y., Vajda, S. & Wilkinson, C. (2009). Kitchen Table Sustainability: Practical Recipes for Community Engagement with Sustainability. London: Earthscan/Routledge. • Schittich, C. (Ed.) (2007). Housing for People of All Ages: Flexible, unrestricted, senior-friendly. Basel: Birkhäuser. (Online source) https://proxy.bau.edu.tr:2420/document/doi/10.11129/detail.9783034615563/html • Williams, J. & Felicitas Hentschke (Eds.) (2018). To Be at Home: House, Work, and Self in the Modern World. Berlin&Boston: De Gruyter Oldenbourg. (Online source) https://proxy.bau.edu.tr:2420/document/doi/10.1515/9783110582765/html |
| Semester Requirements | Number of Activities | Level of Contribution |
| Attendance | % 0 | |
| Laboratory | % 0 | |
| Application | 0 | % 0 |
| Field Work | 0 | % 0 |
| Special Course Internship (Work Placement) | % 0 | |
| Quizzes | % 0 | |
| Homework Assignments | % 0 | |
| Presentation | 20 | % 20 |
| Project | % 0 | |
| Seminar | 0 | % 0 |
| Midterms | 0 | % 0 |
| Preliminary Jury | 1 | % 15 |
| Final | 1 | % 45 |
| Paper Submission | % 0 | |
| Jury | 1 | % 20 |
| Bütünleme | % 0 | |
| Total | % 100 | |
| PERCENTAGE OF SEMESTER WORK | % 55 | |
| PERCENTAGE OF FINAL WORK | % 45 | |
| Total | % 100 | |
| Activities | Number of Activities | Duration (Hours) | Workload |
| Course Hours | 28 | 4 | 112 |
| Laboratory | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Application | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Special Course Internship (Work Placement) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Field Work | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Study Hours Out of Class | 20 | 5 | 100 |
| Presentations / Seminar | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Project | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Homework Assignments | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Quizzes | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Preliminary Jury | 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Midterms | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Paper Submission | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jury | 1 | 10 | 10 |
| Final | 1 | 20 | 20 |
| Total Workload | 250 | ||
| No Effect | 1 Lowest | 2 Low | 3 Average | 4 High | 5 Highest |
| Program Outcomes | Level of Contribution | |
| 1) | Using the theoretical/conceptual and practical knowledge acquired for architectural design, design activities and research. | 5 |
| 2) | Identifying, defining and effectively discussing aesthetic, functional and structural requirements for solving design problems using critical thinking methods. | 5 |
| 3) | Being aware of the diversity of social patterns and user needs, values and behavioral norms, which are important inputs in the formation of the built environment, at local, regional, national and international scales. | 3 |
| 4) | Gaining knowledge and skills about architectural design methods that are focused on people and society, sensitive to natural and built environment in the field of architecture. | 5 |
| 5) | Gaining skills to understand the relationship between architecture and other disciplines, to be able to cooperate, to develop comprehensive projects; to take responsibility in independent studies and group work. | 4 |
| 6) | Giving importance to the protection of natural and cultural values in the design of the built environment by being aware of the responsibilities in terms of human rights and social interests. | 4 |
| 7) | Giving importance to sustainability in the solution of design problems and the use of natural and artificial resources by considering the social, cultural and environmental issues of architecture. | 2 |
| 8) | Being able to convey and communicate all kinds of conceptual and practical thoughts related to the field of architecture by using written, verbal and visual media and information technologies. | 3 |
| 9) | Gaining the ability to understand and use technical information about building technology such as structural systems, building materials, building service systems, construction systems, life safety. | 3 |
| 10) | Being aware of legal and ethical responsibilities in design and application processes. | 2 |