ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING | |||||
Bachelor | TR-NQF-HE: Level 6 | QF-EHEA: First Cycle | EQF-LLL: Level 6 |
Course Code | Course Name | Semester | Theoretical | Practical | Credit | ECTS |
MCH3008 | Control Systems | Fall | 3 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
The course opens with the approval of the Department at the beginning of each semester |
Language of instruction: | En |
Type of course: | Must Course |
Course Level: | Bachelor |
Mode of Delivery: | E-Learning |
Course Coordinator : | Dr. Öğr. Üyesi TUĞCAN DEMİR |
Course Lecturer(s): |
Assoc. Prof. MEHMET BERKE GÜR RA RESUL ÇALIŞKAN |
Course Objectives: | The goal of this course to obtain a basic knowledge on the modeling, characteristics, and performance of feedback control systems, stability, root locus, frequency response methods, Nyquist/Bode diagrams, lead-lag, PID compensators, state space analysis and controller design. |
The students who have succeeded in this course; I. Describe basic concepts of dynamic systems modeling. II. Define the state-variable/state-space, input-ouput and block diagram representations. III. Describe the basic control actions and the transient and steady state response of dynamic systems. IV. Define Routh’s stability criteria and the concept of stability. V. Describe the Root locus analysis and controller design. VI. Define Frequency response and Bode Diagrams. VII. Define the concept of Nyquist stability, relative stability. VIII. Define the concept of controllability, observability and state feedback. |
Review of modeling of dynamic systems using differential equations, transfer functions, state space models, characteristics of feedback systems, time domain transient and steady-state response, stability of feedback systems, the Routh-Hurwitz method, the root-locus procedure, lead-lag compensators, frequency response analysis, Bode diagrams, Nyquist criteria, state feedback controller design. |
Week | Subject | Related Preparation | |
1) | Purpose and Motivation, application to engineering | ||
2) | Idea of System model, Standard Forms, Laplace Transform | ||
3) | Input-Output Models, Transfer Functions, State Variable Models, Block Diagrams | ||
4) | Basic Concepts, Transient and steady state response | ||
5) | Basic Concepts, Transient and steady state response | ||
6) | Routh’s Stability criteria and Root locus analysis | ||
7) | Routh’s Stability criteria and Root locus analysis | ||
8) | Lag, Lead and Lead-Lag Controller design via Root locus | ||
9) | Lag, Lead and Lead-Lag Controller design via Root locus | ||
10) | Frequency Response Analysis | ||
11) | State-Space Analysis | ||
12) | State-Space Control Design | ||
13) | State-Space Control Design | ||
14) | Course Review |
Course Notes: | Feedback Control of Dynamic Systems, 7th Edition, Gene F. Franklin, J. David Powell, Abbas Emami-Naeini, Modern Control Engineering, 5th edition, Katsuhiko Ogata |
References: | Ders notları |
Semester Requirements | Number of Activities | Level of Contribution |
Attendance | 14 | % 0 |
Laboratory | 14 | % 20 |
Application | 0 | % 0 |
Field Work | 0 | % 0 |
Special Course Internship (Work Placement) | 0 | % 0 |
Quizzes | 0 | % 0 |
Homework Assignments | 0 | % 0 |
Presentation | 0 | % 0 |
Project | 1 | % 15 |
Seminar | 0 | % 0 |
Midterms | 1 | % 25 |
Preliminary Jury | % 0 | |
Final | 1 | % 40 |
Paper Submission | % 0 | |
Jury | % 0 | |
Bütünleme | % 0 | |
Total | % 100 | |
PERCENTAGE OF SEMESTER WORK | % 45 | |
PERCENTAGE OF FINAL WORK | % 55 | |
Total | % 100 |
Activities | Number of Activities | Duration (Hours) | Workload |
Course Hours | 14 | 3 | 42 |
Laboratory | 14 | 2 | 28 |
Application | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Special Course Internship (Work Placement) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Field Work | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Study Hours Out of Class | 14 | 6 | 84 |
Presentations / Seminar | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Project | 1 | 10 | 10 |
Homework Assignments | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Quizzes | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Preliminary Jury | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Midterms | 1 | 2 | 2 |
Paper Submission | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Jury | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Final | 1 | 3 | 3 |
Total Workload | 169 |
No Effect | 1 Lowest | 2 Low | 3 Average | 4 High | 5 Highest |
Program Outcomes | Level of Contribution | |
1) | Adequate knowledge in mathematics, science and electric-electronic engineering subjects; ability to use theoretical and applied information in these areas to model and solve engineering problems. | 3 |
2) | Ability to identify, formulate, and solve complex engineering problems; ability to select and apply proper analysis and modeling methods for this purpose. | 4 |
3) | Ability to design a complex system, process, device or product under realistic constraints and conditions, in such a way as to meet the desired result; ability to apply modern design methods for this purpose. (Realistic constraints and conditions may include factors such as economic and environmental issues, sustainability, manufacturability, ethics, health, safety issues, and social and political issues, according to the nature of the design.) | 4 |
4) | Ability to devise, select, and use modern techniques and tools needed for electrical-electronic engineering practice; ability to employ information technologies effectively. | 3 |
5) | Ability to design and conduct experiments, gather data, analyze and interpret results for investigating engineering problems. | 2 |
6) | Ability to work efficiently in intra-disciplinary and multi-disciplinary teams; ability to work individually. | 4 |
7) | Ability to communicate effectively in English and Turkish (if he/she is a Turkish citizen), both orally and in writing. | 4 |
8) | Recognition of the need for lifelong learning; ability to access information, to follow developments in science and technology, and to continue to educate him/herself. | 5 |
9) | Awareness of professional and ethical responsibility. | 4 |
10) | Information about business life practices such as project management, risk management, and change management; awareness of entrepreneurship, innovation, and sustainable development. | 4 |
11) | Knowledge about contemporary issues and the global and societal effects of engineering practices on health, environment, and safety; awareness of the legal consequences of engineering solutions. | 4 |