MBA (ENGLISH, NONTHESIS) | |||||
Master | TR-NQF-HE: Level 7 | QF-EHEA: Second Cycle | EQF-LLL: Level 7 |
Course Code | Course Name | Semester | Theoretical | Practical | Credit | ECTS |
BUS5110 | Organizational Behaviour | Spring | 3 | 0 | 3 | 8 |
The course opens with the approval of the Department at the beginning of each semester |
Language of instruction: | En |
Type of course: | Departmental Elective |
Course Level: | |
Mode of Delivery: | Face to face |
Course Coordinator : | Dr. Öğr. Üyesi TUĞCAN DEMİR |
Course Lecturer(s): |
Dr. İBRAHİM AYHAN TON Dr. Öğr. Üyesi GÜL SELİN ERBEN |
Course Objectives: | The aim of this course is to map these changes, and to study the effects of these changes on organizations giving special emphasis to corporate actors, processes, technology, culture, governance, power, and politics. Organizational theory has changed into a multi dimensional character since 70’s. In order to overcome the ambiguities, this course aims to study the various components of organizations in both modern and postmodern structure. |
The students who have succeeded in this course; The students who succeeded in this course; I. Gain abilityt o apply different concepts related to organizational behavior and human perception. II. To be able to differentiate between the dominant perspectives in the field of organizational behavior III.To be able to differentiate between various types of behavior modification theories and techniques IV. Gain ability to identify specific steps managers can take to motivate employees V. Gain ability to analyze different concepts related to leadership and decision making |
Individual behaviors, communication among individuals , communication in group and between groups that takes place in organizations, conceptual tools for analyzing behaviors, role of management to improve individual, group and organizational performance are some subjects of this course. |
Week | Subject | Related Preparation | |
1) | Introduction to the field of organizational behavior | ||
2) | Attitudes and Job Satisfaction | ||
3) | Personality and Values | ||
4) | Perception and Individual Decision Making | ||
5) | Motivation Concepts | ||
6) | Motivation: From Concepts to Applications | ||
7) | Mid-term Exam | ||
8) | Foundations of Group Behavior & Understanding Work Teams | ||
9) | Communication | ||
10) | Basic Approaches to Leadership and Contemporary Issues in Leadership | ||
11) | Power and Politics | ||
12) | Conflict and Negotiation | ||
13) | Foundations of Organization Structure | ||
14) | Organizational Culture |
Course Notes: | •Stephen Robbins, Timothy Judge, OB, Pearson-Prentice Hall, 2011 |
References: | •Stephen Robbins, Timothy Judge, OB, Pearson-Prentice Hall, 2011 |
Semester Requirements | Number of Activities | Level of Contribution |
Attendance | 14 | % 10 |
Laboratory | % 0 | |
Application | % 0 | |
Field Work | % 0 | |
Special Course Internship (Work Placement) | % 0 | |
Quizzes | % 0 | |
Homework Assignments | % 0 | |
Presentation | % 0 | |
Project | 1 | % 20 |
Seminar | % 0 | |
Midterms | 1 | % 30 |
Preliminary Jury | % 0 | |
Final | 1 | % 40 |
Paper Submission | % 0 | |
Jury | % 0 | |
Bütünleme | % 0 | |
Total | % 100 | |
PERCENTAGE OF SEMESTER WORK | % 40 | |
PERCENTAGE OF FINAL WORK | % 60 | |
Total | % 100 |
Activities | Number of Activities | Workload | |
Course Hours | 14 | 42 | |
Laboratory | |||
Application | 13 | 48 | |
Special Course Internship (Work Placement) | |||
Field Work | |||
Study Hours Out of Class | 14 | 81 | |
Presentations / Seminar | |||
Project | |||
Homework Assignments | |||
Quizzes | |||
Preliminary Jury | |||
Midterms | 1 | 2 | |
Paper Submission | |||
Jury | |||
Final | 1 | 2 | |
Total Workload | 175 |
No Effect | 1 Lowest | 2 Low | 3 Average | 4 High | 5 Highest |
Program Outcomes | Level of Contribution | |
1) | Being able to develop and deepen their knowledge at the level of expertise in the same or a different field, based on undergraduate level qualifications. | |
2) | To be able to comprehend the interdisciplinary interaction with which the field is related. | |
3) | To be able to use the theoretical and applied knowledge at the level of expertise acquired in the field. | |
4) | To be able to interpret and create new knowledge by integrating the knowledge gained in the field with the knowledge from different disciplines. | |
5) | To be able to solve the problems encountered in the field by using research methods. | |
6) | To be able to systematically transfer current developments in the field and their own studies to groups in and outside the field, in written, verbal and visual forms, by supporting them with quantitative and qualitative data. | |
7) | To be able to critically examine social relations and the norms that guide these relations, to develop them and take action to change them when necessary. | |
8) | To be able to critically evaluate the knowledge and skills acquired in the field of expertise and to direct their learning. | |
9) | To be able to supervise and teach these values by observing social, scientific, cultural and ethical values in the stages of collecting, interpreting, applying and announcing the data related to the field. | |
10) | To be able to develop strategy, policy and implementation plans in the fields related to the field and to evaluate the obtained results within the framework of quality processes. | |
11) | To be able to use the knowledge, problem solving and/or application skills they have internalized in their field in interdisciplinary studies. | |
12) | Being able to independently carry out a work that requires expertise in the field. | |
13) | To be able to develop new strategic approaches for the solution of complex and unpredictable problems encountered in applications related to the field and to produce solutions by taking responsibility. | |
14) | Being able to lead in environments that require solving problems related to the field. |