AVIATION MANAGEMENT (ENGLISH, THESIS)
Master TR-NQF-HE: Level 7 QF-EHEA: Second Cycle EQF-LLL: Level 7

Course Introduction and Application Information

Course Code Course Name Semester Theoretical Practical Credit ECTS
AVM5017 Crew Resource Management in Civil Aviation Fall 3 0 3 7
The course opens with the approval of the Department at the beginning of each semester

Basic information

Language of instruction: En
Type of course: Departmental Elective
Course Level:
Mode of Delivery: Face to face
Course Coordinator : Assist. Prof. TÜZÜN TOLGA İNAN
Course Objectives:

Learning Outputs

The students who have succeeded in this course;

Course Content

Weekly Detailed Course Contents

Week Subject Related Preparation

Sources

Course Notes: "1- Sargut, S. (2015). Lider Yöneticinin Benliğine Yolculuk, İstanbul, Beta Yayınları. 2- Adkins, J. Y., Adams, K. M., & Hester, P. T. (2015). How System Errors Affect Aircrew Resource Management (CRM). 3- Complex Adaptive Systems (s. 281-286). San Jose: Elsevier. 4- Barker, A. (2010). Improve your Communication Skills (2. b.). Kogan Page. 5- Corvett, B. A. (2014). Conflict Management: A Practical Guide to Developing Negotiation Strategies. Essex: Pearson. 6- Cusick, S. K., Cortes, A. I., & Rodrigues, C. C. (2017). Commercial Aviation Safety. McGraw Hill. 7- Ebermann, H.-J., & Fahnenbruck, G. (2013). Stress. H.-J. Ebermann, & J. Scheiderer (Dü) içinde, Human Factors on the Flight Deck Safe Piloting Behaviour in Practice. Springer. 8- Jeong, H.-W. (2010). Conflict Management and Resolution. Oxon: Routledge. 9- Kanki, B. G., Anca, J., & Chidester, T. R. (2019). Crew Resource Management (3. b.). Elsevier. 10- MacLeod, N. (2021). Crew Resource Management Training A Competence-based Approach for Airline Pilots. Taylor & Francis Group." "1- Akyurt, İ. Z. ve Toplu Yaşlıoğlu, D. (2018), Havacılık Sektöründe Ekip Planlama Yönetimi: Bir Türk Havayolu Örneği, İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 19 (1), 431. 2- Bacharach, S. B. ve Edward, J. L. (1981). Power and Tactics in Bargaining. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 34 (2), 219. 3- Burchill, F. (1999). Walton and McKersie, A Behavioral Theory of Labor Negotiations (1965). Historıcal Studies in Industrial Relations, (8), 140. 4- Ku, E. C. S.; Chen, F. ve Wei, K. (2014), Transition Process Activities and Team Efficacy of Flight Attendants, Journal of Air Transport Management, (40), 119. 5- Jehn, K. A. ve Bendersky, C. (2003). Intragroup Conflict in Organizations: A Contingency Perspective on The Conflict- Outcome Relationship. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 188- 228. 6- Mack, R. W. ve Snyder, R. C. (1957). ‘The Analysis Of Social Conflict- Toward an Overview and Synthesis. Conflict Resolution, 1 (2), 218. 7- Mitropoulos, P. ve Memarian, B. (2012), Team Processes and Safety of Workers: Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Processes of Construction Crews, Journal of Constructıon Engıneerıng and Management, 138 (10), 1182. 8- Monfries, M. M. ve Moore, P. J. (1999). Interpersonal Skills in Aviation: Applications and Development Interpersonal Skills in Aviation: Applications and Development, JAAER, 9 (1), 26. 9- Okçu, V.; Doğan, E. ve Dayanan, İ. (2018). Öğretmenlerin Okul Kültürü Algılarının Okul Yöneticilerinin Çatışma Yönetimi Stilleri Üzerindeki Etkisi (Şırnak İli Örneği), Anadolu Eğitim Liderliği ve Öğretim Dergisi, 6 (2), 42. 10- Özdemir, U. (1999), Psikiyatri Tedavi Ekibinin Ekip Çalışması Kavramına İlişkin Kendi Bilgilerini ve Çalıştıkları Psikiyatri Tedavi Kurumlarını Değerlendirmeleri, Kriz Dergisi, 7 (2), 17-24. 11- ICAO 12- IATA 13- EASA 14- SHGM"
References:

Evaluation System

Semester Requirements Number of Activities Level of Contribution
Attendance 14 % 10
Laboratory % 0
Application 2 % 10
Field Work % 0
Special Course Internship (Work Placement) % 0
Quizzes % 0
Homework Assignments % 0
Presentation % 0
Project % 0
Seminar % 0
Midterms 1 % 30
Preliminary Jury % 0
Final 1 % 50
Paper Submission % 0
Jury % 0
Bütünleme % 0
Total % 100
PERCENTAGE OF SEMESTER WORK % 50
PERCENTAGE OF FINAL WORK % 50
Total % 100

ECTS / Workload Table

Activities Number of Activities Duration (Hours) Workload
Course Hours 14 3 42
Laboratory 0 0 0
Application 2 10 20
Special Course Internship (Work Placement) 0 0 0
Field Work 0 0 0
Study Hours Out of Class 5 10 50
Presentations / Seminar 0 0 0
Project 0 0 0
Homework Assignments 0 0 0
Quizzes 0 0 0
Preliminary Jury 0 0 0
Midterms 1 30 30
Paper Submission 0 0 0
Jury 0 0 0
Final 1 50 50
Total Workload 192

Contribution of Learning Outcomes to Programme Outcomes

No Effect 1 Lowest 2 Low 3 Average 4 High 5 Highest
           
Program Outcomes Level of Contribution
1) Being able to develop and deepen their knowledge at the level of expertise in the same or a different field, based on undergraduate level qualifications.
2) To be able to comprehend the interdisciplinary interaction with which the field is related.
3) To be able to use the theoretical and applied knowledge at the level of expertise acquired in the field.
4) To be able to interpret and create new knowledge by integrating the knowledge gained in the field with the knowledge from different disciplines,
5) To be able to solve the problems encountered in the field by using research methods.
6) To be able to systematically transfer current developments in the field and their own studies to groups in and outside the field, in written, verbal and visual forms, by supporting them with quantitative and qualitative data.
7) To be able to critically examine social relations and the norms that guide these relations, to develop them and take action to change them when necessary.
8) To be able to critically evaluate the knowledge and skills acquired in the field of expertise and to direct their learning.
9) To be able to supervise and teach these values by observing social, scientific, cultural and ethical values in the stages of collecting, interpreting, applying and announcing the data related to the field.
10) To be able to develop strategy, policy and implementation plans in the fields related to the field and to evaluate the obtained results within the framework of quality processes.
11) Being able to independently carry out a work that requires expertise in the field.
12) To be able to use the knowledge, problem solving and/or application skills they have internalized in their field in interdisciplinary studies.
13) To be able to develop new strategic approaches for the solution of complex and unpredictable problems encountered in applications related to the field and to produce solutions by taking responsibility.
14) Being able to lead in environments that require the resolution of problems related to the field.