MATHEMATICS (TURKISH, PHD)
PhD TR-NQF-HE: Level 8 QF-EHEA: Third Cycle EQF-LLL: Level 8

Course Introduction and Application Information

Course Code Course Name Semester Theoretical Practical Credit ECTS
POL4671 Regional Power Politics Fall 3 0 3 6
The course opens with the approval of the Department at the beginning of each semester

Basic information

Language of instruction: En
Type of course: Departmental Elective
Course Level:
Mode of Delivery: Hybrid
Course Coordinator : Assoc. Prof. ESRA ALBAYRAKOĞLU
Course Objectives: International relations as a field has been great-power centric, focusing almost exclusively on great powers and their interactions. Yet, this course questions this great-power centric analysis of the international system and argue that it is necessary to rethink the international system through the perspective of non-great power states, especially regional powers. As such, this course analyzes the international system though the perspective of regional powers and their security problematique.
Some of the questions the course focuses on: What makes a state a great power versus a regional power? How can we define regions? What is regional hegemony? How is the threat environment of regional powers different from great powers? What are the security goals of regional powers? How does regional power politics differ from great power politics? How did the end of the Cold War impact security environment of regional powers? Why do regional powers build or do not build nuclear weapons? How does the security dynamics of regions differ from each other and how does this impact security of regional powers? Will China be the next peer competitor to the United States? Is war between China and the United States inevitable?

Learning Outputs

The students who have succeeded in this course;
The students who have succeeded in this course;

1. Learn the main theories and debates in international relations.
2. Differentiate between great powers and regional powers and understand how their security environment differ.
3. Learn how each region’s security dynamics differ.
4. Understand how the Cold War and the end of the Cold War impacted regional powers’ and great powers’ security environment.
5. Develop competencies with respect to active inquiry, critical thinking and academic writing.

Course Content

Great power politics; regional powers politics; defining regions, regional powers and great powers; Cold War and post-Cold War politics – structural change in the international system and its impact on regional powers and great powers; regional powers and regional hegemony; nuclear weapons; security dynamics of different regions; rise of China

Weekly Detailed Course Contents

Week Subject Related Preparation
1) Introduction to the course
2) Great Power Politics • John J. Mearsheimer, The Tragedy of Great Power Politics, New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2001, pp. 1-82 or • Kenneth N. Waltz, Theory of International Politics, Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill, 1979, pp. 60-128.
3) Regional Powers and Regions • Michael Handel, Weak States in the International System, London: Frank Cass, 1981, pp. 1-65. • Yasemin Bilgel, Regional Power Politics after the Cold War, The University of Chicago dissertation, pp. 19-29. • Robert Stewart-Ingersoll and Derrick Frazier, Regional Powers and Security Orders, New York: Routledge Press, 2013, pp. 1-40. • T.V. Paul, “Regional Transformation in International Relations,” in International Relations Theory and Regional Transformation, ed. by T.V. Paul, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012, pp. 3-21. • Barry Buzan, “How Regions Were Made and the Legacies for World Politics: An English School Reconnaissance,” in International Relations Theory and Regional Transformation, ed. by T.V. Paul, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012, pp. 22-48.
4) Regional Powers’ Security: Goal of Regional Hegemony? • Dale C. Copeland, “Realism and Neorealism in the Study of Regional Conflict,” in International Relations Theory and Regional Transformation, ed. by T.V. Paul, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012, pp. 49-73. • Jeffrey W. Taliaferro, “Neoclassical Realism and the Study of Regional Order,” in International Relations Theory and Regional Transformation, ed. by T.V. Paul, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012, pp. 74- 106. • Robert Stewart-Ingersoll and Derrick Frazier, Regional Powers and Security Orders: A Theoretical Framework, New York: Routledge Press, 2013, pp. 41-94. • Miriam Prys, “Hegemony, Domination, Detachment: Differences in Regional Powerhood,” International Studies Review, 12:4, Summer 2010, pp. 479-504.
5) Regional Powers During the Cold War • Michael Handel, Weak States in the International System, London: Frank Cass, 1981, pp. 169-216.
6) Regional Powers After the Cold War • William C. Wohlforth, “The Stability of a Unipolar World,” International Security, 24:1, Summer 1999, pp. 5-41. • Robert A. Pape, “Soft Balancing Against the United States,” International Security, 30:1, Summer 2005, pp. 7-45. • Nuno P. Monteiro, “Unrest Assured: Why Unipolarity is not Peaceful,” International Security, 36:3, Winter 2011-2012, pp. 9-40.
7) Regional Power Politics from the Perspective of Regional Powers • Yasemin Bilgel, Regional Power Politics after the Cold War, The University of Chicago dissertation, pp. 30-62.
8) Midterm
9) Regional Powers and Nuclear Weapons • Scott D. Sagan, “Why Do States Build Nuclear Weapons?: Three Models in Search of a Bomb,” International Security, 21:3, Winter 1996-1997, pp. 54-86. • T. V. Paul, Power versus Prudence: Why Nations Forgo Nuclear Weapons, Quebec: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2000, pp. 3-61.
10) Americas: Uniqueness of the United States • Fareed Zakaria, From Wealth to Power: The Unusual Origins of America’s World Role, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999, pp. 3-43, 90-127. • Michael Beckley, Unrivaled: Why America will Remain the World’s Sole Superpower, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2018, pp. 1-32.
11) Europe and Regional Power Politics • John J. Mearsheimer, “Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War,” International Security, 15:1, Summer 1990, pp. 5- 56. • John S. Duffield, “Explaining the Long Peace in Europe: The Contributions of Regional Security Regimes,” Review of International Studies, 20:4, 1994, pp. 369-388.
12) The Middle East and Regional Power Politics • Rashid Khalidi, Sowing Crisis: The Cold War and American Dominance in the Middle East, Boston: Beacon Press, 2009, pp. 70-100, (recommended pp. 101-158). • Svante E. Cornell, “What Drives Turkish Foreign Policy?” Middle East Quarterly, 19:1, Winter 2012, pp. 13-24. • Yasemin Bilgel, “Turkey’s Activism in the Middle East: The Role of Structural Factors,” in Turkey in Transition: Politics, Society and Foreign Policy, ed. by Ebru Canan-Sokullu, Berlin: Peter Land, 2020, pp. 193-208.
13) Africa and Regional Power Politics • Elizabeth Schmidt, Foreign Intervention in Africa: From the Cold War to the War on Terror, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013, pp. 18-34, 120, 193-230. • Miriam Prys, “Regional Hegemon or Regional Bystander: South Africa’s Zimbabwe Policy 2000-2005,” Politikon, 36:2, 2009, pp. 193-218.
14) Asia and Regional Power Politics: The Rise of China • Mohammed Ayoob, “India as Regional Hegemon: External Opportunities and Internal Constraints,” International Journal, 56:3, 1991, pp. 420-448. • Michael Auslin, “Japan’s New Realism,” Foreign Affairs, 95:2, March/April 2016, pp. 125-134. • John J. Mearsheimer, “The Gathering Storm: China’s Challenge to US Power in Asia,” The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 3:4, 2010, pp. 381-396. • Charles Glaser, “Will China’s Rise Lead to War?” Foreign Affairs, 90:2, March 2011, pp. 80-91. • Stephen G. Brooks and William C. Wohlforth, “The Once and Future Superpower: Why China Won’t Overtake the United States,” Foreign Affairs, 95:3, May/June 2016, pp. 91-104. • Recommended: Michael Beckley, Unrivaled: Why America will Remain the World’s Sole Superpower, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2018, pp. 98-134.

Sources

Course Notes: Course Notes / Textbooks: Mearsheimer, John J. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W.W. Norton &Company. (or newer edition) Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill. Handel, Michael. 1981. Weak States in the International System. London: Frank Cass. Paul, T.V. ed. 2012. International Relations Theory and Regional Transformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Stewart-Ingersoll, Robert and Derrick Frazier. 2012. Regional Powers and Security Orders. New York: Routledge. Bilgel, Yasemin. 2014. Regional Power Politics After the Cold War. The University of Chicago dissertation. Zakaria, Fareed. 1998. From Wealth to Power: The Unusual Origins of America’s World Role. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. There will be chapters from the readings listed above that will be in the coursepack. You can locate the articles in the library – the articles will be download to ItsLearning as well.
References: Mearsheimer, John J. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W.W. Norton &Company. (or newer edition) Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill. Handel, Michael. 1981. Weak States in the International System. London: Frank Cass. Paul, T.V. ed. 2012. International Relations Theory and Regional Transformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Stewart-Ingersoll, Robert and Derrick Frazier. 2012. Regional Powers and Security Orders. New York: Routledge. Bilgel, Yasemin. 2014. Regional Power Politics After the Cold War. The University of Chicago dissertation. Zakaria, Fareed. 1998. From Wealth to Power: The Unusual Origins of America’s World Role. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Kitap bölümleri ders için hazırlanmış kitapçıkta bulunmaktadır. Kitaplara kütüphaneden de erişilebilir. Makaleler ItsLearning’e yüklenecektir. Kütüphaneden de makalelere erişilebilir.

Evaluation System

Semester Requirements Number of Activities Level of Contribution
Attendance % 0
Laboratory % 0
Application % 0
Field Work % 0
Special Course Internship (Work Placement) % 0
Quizzes % 0
Homework Assignments % 0
Presentation 1 % 30
Project % 0
Seminar % 0
Midterms 1 % 30
Preliminary Jury % 0
Final 1 % 40
Paper Submission % 0
Jury % 0
Bütünleme % 0
Total % 100
PERCENTAGE OF SEMESTER WORK % 60
PERCENTAGE OF FINAL WORK % 40
Total % 100

ECTS / Workload Table

Activities Number of Activities Workload
Course Hours 14 42
Laboratory
Application
Special Course Internship (Work Placement)
Field Work
Study Hours Out of Class 14 102
Presentations / Seminar
Project
Homework Assignments 1 0.5
Quizzes
Preliminary Jury
Midterms 1 2
Paper Submission
Jury
Final 1 2
Total Workload 148.5

Contribution of Learning Outcomes to Programme Outcomes

No Effect 1 Lowest 2 Low 3 Average 4 High 5 Highest
           
Program Outcomes Level of Contribution