EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY (TURKISH, PHD) | |||||
PhD | TR-NQF-HE: Level 8 | QF-EHEA: Third Cycle | EQF-LLL: Level 8 |
Course Code | Course Name | Semester | Theoretical | Practical | Credit | ECTS |
ISM6012 | Advanced Decision Making with App. | Fall | 3 | 0 | 3 | 12 |
The course opens with the approval of the Department at the beginning of each semester |
Language of instruction: | Tr |
Type of course: | Departmental Elective |
Course Level: | |
Mode of Delivery: | Face to face |
Course Coordinator : | Dr. Öğr. Üyesi SAİT GÜL |
Course Objectives: |
The students who have succeeded in this course; |
Week | Subject | Related Preparation | |
1) | Introduction to Decision Science | ||
2) | Social Choice Theory - I | ||
3) | Social Choice Theory - II | ||
4) | Social Choice Theory - III | ||
5) | Presentation of Selected Papers - I | ||
6) | Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) - Classical Methods, TOPSIS | ||
7) | Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) - AHP, PROMETHEE | ||
8) | MCDM under Group Environment | ||
9) | Presentation of Selected Papers - II | ||
10) | MCDM under Fuzzy Environment - I | ||
11) | MCDM under Fuzzy Environment - II | ||
12) | Cumulative Belief Degrees Approach | ||
13) | Consensus Formation & Weighting of Experts | ||
14) | Presentations of the Projects |
Course Notes: | Hwang, C.L., Lin, M.J. (1987). Group Decision Making under Multiple Criteria, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. • Figueira, J., Greco, S., Ehrgott, M. (2005). Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State-of-the-Art Surveys, Springer Science + Business Media, Inc., Boston. • Yıldırım, B.F., Önder, E. (2015). Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yöntemleri, Dora Basım-Yayın, Bursa. • Yoon, K.P., Hwang, C.L. (1995). Multiple Attribute Decision Making: An Introduction, Sage Publications California. • Kahraman, C. (2008). Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making, Springer Science+Business Media, Boston. |
References: |
Semester Requirements | Number of Activities | Level of Contribution |
Attendance | % 0 | |
Laboratory | % 0 | |
Application | % 0 | |
Field Work | % 0 | |
Special Course Internship (Work Placement) | % 0 | |
Quizzes | % 0 | |
Homework Assignments | % 0 | |
Presentation | 2 | % 20 |
Project | % 0 | |
Seminar | % 0 | |
Midterms | % 0 | |
Preliminary Jury | % 0 | |
Final | 1 | % 40 |
Paper Submission | 1 | % 40 |
Jury | % 0 | |
Bütünleme | % 0 | |
Total | % 100 | |
PERCENTAGE OF SEMESTER WORK | % 60 | |
PERCENTAGE OF FINAL WORK | % 40 | |
Total | % 100 |
Activities | Number of Activities | Duration (Hours) | Workload |
Course Hours | 13 | 3 | 39 |
Laboratory | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Application | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Special Course Internship (Work Placement) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Field Work | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Study Hours Out of Class | 14 | 10 | 140 |
Presentations / Seminar | 3 | 3 | 9 |
Project | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Homework Assignments | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Quizzes | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Preliminary Jury | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Midterms | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Paper Submission | 1 | 120 | 120 |
Jury | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Final | 1 | 3 | 3 |
Total Workload | 311 |
No Effect | 1 Lowest | 2 Low | 3 Average | 4 High | 5 Highest |
Program Outcomes | Level of Contribution | |
1) | To comprehend current and advanced knowledge in the field of educational technology and being able to relate this knowledge information with education. | |
2) | To comprehend relations between Educational Technology and others disciplines and being able to state ideas concerning possible implementations in framework of these relations. | |
3) | To be able to evaluate, improve and design applications, methods generate new ideas which are innovative for educational technology. | |
4) | Being able to manage original research in educational technology using interdisciplinary perspective. | |
5) | Being able to investigate original issues within the frame of scientific research techniques as independently or in cooperation with others. Then being able to present the obtained results as research report. | |
6) | Being able to advocate original views in discussions in the field of educational technologies. | |
7) | Being able to communicate with experts in the field of educational technologies in written, orally and visually. | |
8) | Being able to create new ideas and techniques concerning educational technology using high level mental process such as creative and critical thinking, problem solving and decision making. | |
9) | Being able to make contributions to the society in being an information society and sustaining this by following the emerging scientific, technological, social and cultural developments. | |
10) | To make contribution to solve social, scientific, cultural and ethic problems in issues related to e-learning technologies and promote development of these values. | |
11) | Being able to make contributions to the knowledge in the field by publishing a scientific article in the field of educational technologies at national or international journals. | |
12) | Being able to lead the situations when original and interdisciplinary problems are needed to be solved. |