CYBER SECURITY (ENGLISH, THESIS)
Master TR-NQF-HE: Level 7 QF-EHEA: Second Cycle EQF-LLL: Level 7

Course Introduction and Application Information

Course Code Course Name Semester Theoretical Practical Credit ECTS
CYS5119 Secure Web Software Development Fall
Spring
 3 0 3 12
The course opens with the approval of the Department at the beginning of each semester

Basic information

Language of instruction: En
Type of course: Departmental Elective
Course Level:
Mode of Delivery: Face to face
Course Coordinator : Dr. Öğr. Üyesi AHMET NACİ ÜNAL
Course Objectives: Learning software assurance topic and learning principles of secure software development.

Learning Outputs

The students who have succeeded in this course;
Students will learn the following items: How to store software on escrow services? Requirements of secure software. Requirement of software certification. Principles of secure software development.

Course Content

Fundamentals of information assurance, SDLC, software maturity, security enhancement methods, security measurement methods.

Weekly Detailed Course Contents

Week Subject Related Preparation
1) Course outline Lecturer notes
2) Information assurance concept Lecturer notes
3) Necessity of software security Lecturer notes
4) Software licensing and certification Lecturer notes
5) Data escrow concept and its applications Lecturer notes
6) SDLC Lecturer notes
7) Secure software development Lecturer notes
8) Secure software development Lecturer notes
9) Secure software development patterns Lecturer notes
10) Software maturity Lecturer notes
11) Determining software security and software security metering Lecturer notes
12) Auditing of secure software development cycle Lecturer notes
13) Up-to-date discussion Lecturer notes
14) Up-to-date discussion Lecturer notes

Sources

Course Notes: Information Assurance Handbook: Effective Computer Security and Risk Management Strategies, Corey Schou, Steven Hernandez, 2014, McGraw-Hill Osborne Media. Secure and Resilient Software Development, Mark S. Merkow, Lakshmikanth Raghavan, 2010, Auerbach Publication.
References: Ders notları

Evaluation System

Semester Requirements Number of Activities Level of Contribution
Attendance 10 % 0
Laboratory 0 % 0
Application 0 % 0
Field Work 0 % 0
Special Course Internship (Work Placement) 0 % 0
Quizzes 0 % 0
Homework Assignments 4 % 10
Presentation 1 % 10
Project 0 % 0
Seminar 0 % 0
Midterms 1 % 20
Preliminary Jury 0 % 0
Final 1 % 60
Paper Submission 0 % 0
Jury 0 % 0
Bütünleme % 0
Total % 100
PERCENTAGE OF SEMESTER WORK % 40
PERCENTAGE OF FINAL WORK % 60
Total % 100

ECTS / Workload Table

Activities Number of Activities Duration (Hours) Workload
Course Hours 14 3 42
Laboratory 0 0 0
Application 0 0 0
Special Course Internship (Work Placement) 0 0 0
Field Work 0 0 0
Study Hours Out of Class 14 12 168
Presentations / Seminar 2 3 6
Project 0 0 0
Homework Assignments 4 8 32
Quizzes 0 0 0
Preliminary Jury 0 0 0
Midterms 1 20 20
Paper Submission 0 0 0
Jury 0 0 0
Final 1 20 20
Total Workload 288

Contribution of Learning Outcomes to Programme Outcomes

No Effect 1 Lowest 2 Low 3 Average 4 High 5 Highest
           
Program Outcomes Level of Contribution
1) Being able to develop and deepen their knowledge at the level of expertise in the same or a different field, based on undergraduate level qualifications.
1) To be able to supervise and teach these values by observing social, scientific, cultural and ethical values in the stages of collecting, interpreting, applying and announcing the data related to the field.
1) Being able to independently carry out a work that requires expertise in the field.
1) To be able to critically evaluate the knowledge and skills acquired in the field of expertise and to direct their learning.
1) To be able to systematically transfer current developments in the field and their own studies to groups in and outside the field, in written, verbal and visual forms, by supporting them with quantitative and qualitative data.
2) To be able to interpret and create new knowledge by integrating the knowledge gained in the field with the knowledge from different disciplines,
2) To be able to develop strategy, policy and implementation plans in the fields related to the field and to evaluate the obtained results within the framework of quality processes.
2) To be able to critically examine social relations and the norms that guide these relations, to develop them and take action to change them when necessary.
2) To be able to use the theoretical and applied knowledge at the level of expertise acquired in the field.
2) To be able to develop new strategic approaches for the solution of complex and unpredictable problems encountered in applications related to the field and to produce solutions by taking responsibility.
2) To be able to comprehend the interdisciplinary interaction with which the field is related.
3) To be able to use the knowledge, problem solving and/or application skills they have internalized in their field in interdisciplinary studies.
3) Being able to lead in environments that require the resolution of problems related to the field.
3) To be able to solve the problems encountered in the field by using research methods.