EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY (ENGLISH, THESIS) | |||||
Master | TR-NQF-HE: Level 7 | QF-EHEA: Second Cycle | EQF-LLL: Level 7 |
Course Code | Course Name | Semester | Theoretical | Practical | Credit | ECTS |
ELT5020 | Teaching Language Skills | Spring | 3 | 0 | 3 | 8 |
The course opens with the approval of the Department at the beginning of each semester |
Language of instruction: | En |
Type of course: | Departmental Elective |
Course Level: | |
Mode of Delivery: | Face to face |
Course Coordinator : | Dr. Öğr. Üyesi YEŞİM KEŞLİ DOLLAR |
Course Objectives: | This course aims to provide the students with the practical skills they need to teach English and a theoretical background to TESOL. |
The students who have succeeded in this course; At the end of this course students will learn both the theories and practices behind the following: • How to teach speaking skills: teaching the sounds, stress and intonation of English. • How to teach listening skills: practical approaches you can use in the classroom. • How to teach reading skills: practical ideas in teaching intensive and extensive reading. • How to teach writing skills: from individual sentences to descriptive passages. |
This course covers the theories and applications of language teaching skills. |
Week | Subject | Related Preparation | |
1) | Orientation to the course, syllabus. Sign up for tasks. | ||
2) | • Learners • Teachers | ||
3) | • Managing the classroom • Planning lessons | ||
4) | • Describing learning and teaching | ||
5) | • Describing language | ||
6) | • Teaching the language system | ||
7) | • MIDTERM | ||
8) | • Teaching Reading | ||
9) | • Teaching Writing | ||
10) | Presentations | ||
11) | • Teaching Speaking | ||
12) | • Teaching Listening | ||
13) | Presentations | ||
14) | • REVISION | ||
15) | • FINAL EXAM |
Course Notes: | Harmer, J. (2007). How to teach English. Pearson Longman Brown, H. D. (1994). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. USA: Prentice Hall. Doff, A. (1990). Teach English: A training course for teachers. NY: CUP Nunan, D. (1998). Language teaching methodology: A textbook for teachers. Hertfordshire: Prentice Hall Europe. |
References: | Richards, J. C. & Renandya, W. A. (2002). Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice. NY:CUP. Singhal, M. (2006). Teacing reading to adult second language learners. USA: The reading matrix, Inc. Ur, P. A course in language teaching: Practice and theory. NY: CUP. |
Semester Requirements | Number of Activities | Level of Contribution |
Attendance | 3 | % 10 |
Laboratory | 0 | % 0 |
Application | 0 | % 0 |
Field Work | 0 | % 0 |
Special Course Internship (Work Placement) | 0 | % 0 |
Quizzes | 0 | % 0 |
Homework Assignments | 3 | % 20 |
Presentation | 1 | % 20 |
Project | 1 | % 20 |
Seminar | 0 | % 0 |
Midterms | 0 | % 0 |
Preliminary Jury | 0 | % 0 |
Final | 1 | % 30 |
Paper Submission | 0 | % 0 |
Jury | % 0 | |
Bütünleme | % 0 | |
Total | % 100 | |
PERCENTAGE OF SEMESTER WORK | % 50 | |
PERCENTAGE OF FINAL WORK | % 50 | |
Total | % 100 |
Activities | Number of Activities | Duration (Hours) | Workload |
Course Hours | 14 | 3 | 42 |
Laboratory | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Application | 2 | 8 | 16 |
Special Course Internship (Work Placement) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Field Work | 4 | 10 | 40 |
Study Hours Out of Class | 3 | 12 | 36 |
Presentations / Seminar | 2 | 10 | 20 |
Project | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Homework Assignments | 4 | 12 | 48 |
Quizzes | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Preliminary Jury | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Midterms | 1 | 2 | 2 |
Paper Submission | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Jury | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Final | 1 | 2 | 2 |
Total Workload | 206 |
No Effect | 1 Lowest | 2 Low | 3 Average | 4 High | 5 Highest |
Program Outcomes | Level of Contribution | |
1) | Being able to develop and deepen their knowledge at the level of expertise in the same or a different field, based on undergraduate level qualifications. | |
2) | To be able to comprehend the interdisciplinary interaction with which the field is related. | |
3) | To be able to use the theoretical and applied knowledge at the level of expertise acquired in the field. | |
4) | To be able to interpret and create new knowledge by integrating the knowledge gained in the field with the knowledge from different disciplines. | |
5) | To be able to solve the problems encountered in the field by using research methods. | |
6) | To be able to systematically transfer current developments in the field and their own studies to groups in and outside the field, in written, verbal and visual forms, by supporting them with quantitative and qualitative data. | |
7) | To be able to critically examine social relations and the norms that guide these relations, to develop them and take action to change them when necessary. | |
8) | To be able to critically evaluate the knowledge and skills acquired in the field of expertise and to direct their learning. | |
9) | To be able to supervise and teach these values by observing social, scientific, cultural and ethical values in the stages of collecting, interpreting, applying and announcing the data related to the field. | |
10) | To be able to develop strategy, policy and implementation plans in the fields related to the field and to evaluate the obtained results within the framework of quality processes. | |
11) | To be able to use the knowledge, problem solving and/or application skills they have internalized in their field in interdisciplinary studies. | |
12) | Being able to independently carry out a work that requires expertise in the field. | |
13) | To be able to develop new strategic approaches for the solution of complex and unpredictable problems encountered in applications related to the field and to produce solutions by taking responsibility. | |
14) | Being able to lead in environments that require the resolution of problems related to the field. |