| MATHEMATICS (TURKISH, PHD) | |||||
| PhD | TR-NQF-HE: Level 8 | QF-EHEA: Third Cycle | EQF-LLL: Level 8 | ||
| Course Code | Course Name | Semester | Theoretical | Practical | Credit | ECTS |
| CNG4010 | Crises Intervention and Trauma | Fall | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| The course opens with the approval of the Department at the beginning of each semester |
| Language of instruction: | En |
| Type of course: | Departmental Elective |
| Course Level: | |
| Mode of Delivery: | Face to face |
| Course Coordinator : | Dr. Öğr. Üyesi NEVİN DÖLEK |
| Course Objectives: | This course will provide students the efficiency of crises intervention, and the knowledge about crises. |
|
The students who have succeeded in this course; Acquire knowledge on crisis and crisis intervention. Learn analyzing individual and wide scale crisis. Learn effective methods of crisis intervention. Learn factors that affect crisis and crisis intervention. Effectively apply what they have learned to crisis in their own lives and in their environment. |
| This course includes the defnition of crises, types of crises, crises reactions in adulthood and childhood, techniques of crises interventions with a developmental view, case studies, and interventions for sucidial individuals. |
| Week | Subject | Related Preparation | |
| 1) | Introduction: Concept of crises, crises intervention, it's role in preventive mental health | ||
| 2) | the development of crises intervention theories, typical development of crisis, types of crises. | ||
| 3) | The goals of crisis intervention and the characteristics of crisis intervention | ||
| 4) | Principals of Continuity | ||
| 5) | Theories of Coping and posttraumatic development | ||
| 6) | Crises Interventions | ||
| 7) | Debriefing | ||
| 8) | Conception of death and coping with loss of life | ||
| 9) | Suicidal behavior, theories, risk factors, general characteristics | ||
| 10) | Coping with suicidal thought, prevention of suicide | ||
| 11) | School Crisis Management | ||
| 12) | Cultural concerns in crises intervention and ethical principles | ||
| 13) | -Human services workers in crisis : burnout, vicarious traumatization, and compassion fatigue | ||
| 14) | General Assessment | ||
| Course Notes: | Gilligand, B. E., & James, R. K. (1997). Crisis intervention strategies. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole. |
| References: | - Ayalon, Ofra. (1992) . Rescue . Haifa: Chevron. - Glasser, William. (1998) Crisis Counseling For a Quality School Community: Applying Wm. Glasser’s Choice Theory. Washington, D.C. : Accelerated Development. - Foa, E., Keane, T.M., Friedman, M.J. Eds. (2004). Effective Treatments for PTSD. New York: The Guilford Pres. - Brock, S.E., Lazarus, P.J., Jimerson, S.R. Eds. ( 2002) Best Practices in School Crisis Prevention and Intervention . Bethesta, MD: NASP - Herman, Judith. (2007) Travma ve İyileşme. İstanbul: Literatür - Kriz Müdahale. Ders Notları, Nevin Dölek - Class Notes |
| Semester Requirements | Number of Activities | Level of Contribution |
| Attendance | % 0 | |
| Laboratory | % 0 | |
| Application | % 0 | |
| Field Work | % 0 | |
| Special Course Internship (Work Placement) | % 0 | |
| Quizzes | % 0 | |
| Homework Assignments | % 0 | |
| Presentation | % 0 | |
| Project | 1 | % 40 |
| Seminar | % 0 | |
| Midterms | 1 | % 20 |
| Preliminary Jury | % 0 | |
| Final | 1 | % 40 |
| Paper Submission | % 0 | |
| Jury | % 0 | |
| Bütünleme | % 0 | |
| Total | % 100 | |
| PERCENTAGE OF SEMESTER WORK | % 20 | |
| PERCENTAGE OF FINAL WORK | % 80 | |
| Total | % 100 | |
| Activities | Number of Activities | Duration (Hours) | Workload |
| Course Hours | 14 | 3 | 42 |
| Laboratory | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Application | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Special Course Internship (Work Placement) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Field Work | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Study Hours Out of Class | 3 | 35 | 105 |
| Presentations / Seminar | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Project | 1 | 5 | 5 |
| Homework Assignments | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Quizzes | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Preliminary Jury | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Midterms | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| Paper Submission | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jury | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Final | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| Total Workload | 156 | ||
| No Effect | 1 Lowest | 2 Low | 3 Average | 4 High | 5 Highest |
| Program Outcomes | Level of Contribution |