MATHEMATICS (TURKISH, PHD) | |||||
PhD | TR-NQF-HE: Level 8 | QF-EHEA: Third Cycle | EQF-LLL: Level 8 |
Course Code | Course Name | Semester | Theoretical | Practical | Credit | ECTS |
ELT3002 | Literature and Language Teaching | Fall | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 |
The course opens with the approval of the Department at the beginning of each semester |
Language of instruction: | En |
Type of course: | Departmental Elective |
Course Level: | |
Mode of Delivery: | Face to face |
Course Coordinator : | Dr. Öğr. Üyesi MUSTAFA POLAT |
Course Lecturer(s): |
Dr. Öğr. Üyesi HATİCE ÖVGÜ TÜZÜN Dr. Öğr. Üyesi ELİF BAŞ |
Course Objectives: | The aim of this course is: 1- to help students develop their ability to use literature in the ELT classroom through close reading of selected literary texts in different genres. 2- to articulate perceptive and analytical thinking when discussing and writing about literary texts. |
The students who have succeeded in this course; The students who have succeeded in this course; 1- Find creative ways of using literary works in teaching ELT classroom. 2- Develop and effectively communicate personal and critical responses to literary texts and others’ views. 3- Will be able to critically and independently read, analyze and appreciate literary texts. |
This course is designed to raise an awareness of various approaches to the integration of literary texts into ELT contexts. The students will critically engage with literary texts across the three main genres of prose, poetry and drama. The course focuses on each genre separately and introduces ways that students can use such literary works in their own classes in the future. |
Week | Subject | Related Preparation | |
1) | Discussion - literature | Introduction to the Course. What makes a work of literature great? | |
2) | Short Story Stream of consciousness method | Short Story: What we talk about when we talk about love – Raymond Carver Narration – opposite of stream of consciousness Close reading - Speaking: Can we define love? | |
3) | Short Story | Raymond Carver continued | |
4) | Poetry - Translation On language complications | Shakespeare selected sonnets Pablo Neruda Emily Dickinson | |
5) | Poetry | Selected poems continued | |
6) | Attentive Listening | Listening Exercises Short Story: The Rocking-Horse Winner - D.H. Lawrence | |
7) | Midterm I | ||
8) | Play / On Identity Assignment: Reading the play | Anna Deavere Smith (reading, speaking) Excerpts – “Fires in the Mirror” | |
9) | Play / On Identity | Anna Deavere Smith continued | |
10) | Blogging, literature? | Writing assignment in class. Sharing and feedback. | |
11) | Absurd Theatre Assignment: reading the play | Can we really connect? Play: Edward Albee: The Zoo Story | |
12) | Realism / Illusion or not? Assignment: Reading the play | Play: Arthur Miller: Death of a Salesman | |
13) | Midterm II | ||
14) | General Evaluation /Discussion on Projects |
Course Notes: | Seçilen edebi eserler |
References: |
Semester Requirements | Number of Activities | Level of Contribution |
Attendance | % 0 | |
Laboratory | % 0 | |
Application | % 0 | |
Field Work | % 0 | |
Special Course Internship (Work Placement) | % 0 | |
Quizzes | % 0 | |
Homework Assignments | % 0 | |
Presentation | % 0 | |
Project | 2 | % 25 |
Seminar | % 0 | |
Midterms | 2 | % 40 |
Preliminary Jury | % 0 | |
Final | 1 | % 35 |
Paper Submission | % 0 | |
Jury | % 0 | |
Bütünleme | % 0 | |
Total | % 100 | |
PERCENTAGE OF SEMESTER WORK | % 40 | |
PERCENTAGE OF FINAL WORK | % 60 | |
Total | % 100 |
Activities | Number of Activities | Duration (Hours) | Workload |
Course Hours | 14 | 3 | 42 |
Laboratory | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Application | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Special Course Internship (Work Placement) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Field Work | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Study Hours Out of Class | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Presentations / Seminar | 2 | 6 | 12 |
Project | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Homework Assignments | 2 | 4 | 8 |
Quizzes | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Preliminary Jury | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Midterms | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Paper Submission | 4 | 6 | 24 |
Jury | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Final | 1 | 2 | 2 |
Total Workload | 89 |
No Effect | 1 Lowest | 2 Low | 3 Average | 4 High | 5 Highest |
Program Outcomes | Level of Contribution |