|
Week |
Subject |
Related Preparation |
1) |
Critics on Projects /Re-thinking Dwelling |
|
1) |
Course Description |
|
2) |
Demography and Housing Typology of Istanbul |
|
3) |
Öğrenci Sunumları: Housing Typology of the Hometown / Kültürel Farklılıklar |
Heidegger, M. (2008). Building Dwelling Thinking. In Basic Writings (ed. By D. Farrel Krell) London: Harperperennial. Modern Thought, p. 343-364. |
4) |
Student Presentations: Housing Typology of the Hometown |
Mugerauer, R.(1994). Homelessness and the Human Condition (chapter 9). In Interpretations on Behalf of Space. Environmental Displacements and Alternative Responses. Albany: State University of University Press, p. 151-161.
Mugerauer, R.(1994). A Homecoming. Design on Behalf of Place (chapter 10). In Interpretations on Behalf of Space. Environmental Displacements and Alternative Responses. Albany: State University of University Press, p. 162- 186.
|
5) |
Alternative Living Environments / Dwelling Experiences
Critics of Proposals for Re-thinking Dwelling Projects |
Soja, E. W. (1996). Exploring the Spaces that Difference Makes: Notes on the Margin. In Thirdspace,Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, p. 82-105
Keller, S. (2003). Community. Pursuing the Dream, Living the Relity. Princeton and Oxford: Primceton University Press.
|
6) |
Alternative Living Environments / Dwelling Experiences
Critics |
Beck, U. (1998). The Individualization of Social Inequality: Life Forms and and the Demise of Tradition (chapter 3). In Risk Society. Towards a New Modernity, trans. By Mark Ritter. London: Sage Publications, p. 85-102.
McLeod, M., (1996). “Other Spaces” and “Others”. In The Sex of Architecture (eds) D. Agrest, P. Conway, L. K. Weisman, Harry N. Abrams Publishers.
|
7) |
INTERIM REVİEW-Re-Thinking Dwelling |
|
8) |
Transformation of the Built Environment and Housing |
Franklin, B. (2006). Towards a Contextual Approach. Housing Transformations. Shaping the Space of 21st Century Living. London & New York: Routledge, p. 11-32.
Lefebvre, H. (2000). Philosophy and the City (chapter 4). In Writings on Cities, trans. and ed. by E. Kofman and E. Lebas, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, p. 86-93.
|
9) |
Gentrification /De-Territorialization / Gated Communities |
Koolhas, R. (1994). The Double Life of Utopia: The Skyscraper. In Delirious New York. NY: The monacelli Pres, p. 81-109.
Koolhas, R. (1994). The Skyscraper Theorists. In Delirious New York. NY: The monacelli Pres, p. 110-130.
|
10) |
Urban-Renewal Projects |
Lefebvre, H. (2000). Lost in Transposition – Time, Space and the City (chapter 1). In Writings on Cities, trans. and ed. by E. Kofman and E. Lebas, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, p. 3-60. |
11) |
Urban Renewal Projects
Film: Ekümenopolis |
Kwinter, S. (2002). Modernist Space and the Fragment. In Architectures of Time. Toward a Theory of Event in Modernist Culture. The Mıt Pres, p. 34-50. |
12) |
Critics on Project |
|
13) |
Critics on Projects |
|
14) |
Sunumlar: Barınmayı Yeniden Düşünmek Projesi |
|
Course Notes: |
gerektiğinde verilecektir
will be given when necessary |
References: |
Soja, E. W. (1996). Exploring the Spaces that Difference Makes: Notes on the Magrin. In Thirdspace,Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, p. 82-105
Keller, S. (2003). Community. Pursuing the Dream, Living the Relity. Princeton and Oxford: Primceton University Press.
Stoner, J. (2012). What is a Minor Architecture. In Towards a Minor Architecture. London & Cambridge: MIT University Press, p. 1-20.
Mugerauer, R.(1994). Homelessness and the Human Condition (chapter 9). In Interpretations on Behalf of Space. Environmental Displacements and Alternative Responses. Albany: State University of University Press, p. 151-161.
Mugerauer, R.(1994). A Homecoming. Design on Behalf of Place (chapter 10). In Interpretations on Behalf of Space. Environmental Displacements and Alternative Responses. Albany: State University of University Press, p. 162- 186.
Lefebvre, H. (2000). Lost in Transposition – Time, Space and the City (chapter 1). In Writings on Cities, trans. and ed. by E. Kofman and E. Lebas, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, p. 3-60.
Lefebvre, H. (2000). Philosophy and the City (chapter 4). In Writings on Cities, trans. and ed. by E. Kofman and E. Lebas, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, p. 86-93.
Kwinter, S. (2002). Modernist Space and the Fragment. In Architectures of Time. Toward a Theory of Event in Modernist Culture. The Mıt Pres, p. 34-50.
Beck, U. (1998). The Individualization of Social Inequality: Life Forms and and the Demise of Tradition (chapter 3). In Risk Society. Towards a New Modernity, trans. By Mark Ritter. London: Sage Publications, p. 85-102.
Koolhas, R. (1994). The Double Life of Utopia: The Skyscraper. In Delirious New York. NY: The monacelli Pres, p. 81-109.
Koolhas, R. (1994). The Skyscraper Theorists. In Delirious New York. NY: The monacelli Pres, p. 110-130.
Marcus, C. C. (1995). House of a Mirror of Self. Exploring the Deeper Meaning of Home. Berkeley: Conari Pres.p. 3-19.
Massey, D. (1994). A Place Called Home. In Space Place and Gender. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Pres, p. 157-173.
McLeod, M., (1996). “Other Spaces” and “Others”. In The Sex of Architecture (eds) D. Agrest, P. Conway, L. K. Weisman, Harry N. Abrams Publishers.
|
|
Program Outcomes |
Level of Contribution |
1) |
Develop and deepen the current and advanced knowledge in the field with original thought and/or research and come up with innovative definitions based on Master's degree qualifications. |
|
2) |
Conceive the interdisciplinary interaction which the field is related with ; come up with original solutions by using knowledge requiring proficiency on analysis, synthesis and assessment of new and complex ideas. |
|
3) |
Evaluate and use new information within the field in a systematic approach. |
|
4) |
Develop an innovative knowledge, method, design and/or practice or adapt an already known knowledge, method, design and/or practice to another field; research, conceive, design, adapt and implement an original subject. |
|
5) |
Critical analysis, synthesis and evaluation of new and complex ideas. |
|
6) |
Gain advanced level skills in the use of research methods in the field of study. |
|
7) |
Contribute the progression in the field by producing an innovative idea, skill, design and/or practice or by adapting an already known idea, skill, design, and/or practice to a different field independently. |
|
8) |
Broaden the borders of the knowledge in the field by producing or interpreting an original work or publishing at least one scientific paper in the field in national and/or international refereed journals. |
|
9) |
Demonstrate leadership in contexts requiring innovative and interdisciplinary problem solving. |
|
10) |
Develop new ideas and methods in the field by using high level mental processes such as creative and critical thinking, problem solving and decision making. |
|
11) |
Investigate and improve social connections and their conducting norms and manage the actions to change them when necessary. |
|
12) |
Defend original views when exchanging ideas in the field with professionals and communicate effectively by showing competence in the field. |
|
13) |
Ability to communicate and discuss orally, in written and visually with peers by using a foreign language at least at a level of European Language Portfolio C1 General Level. |
|
14) |
Contribute to the transition of the community to an information society and its sustainability process by introducing scientific, technological, social or cultural improvements. |
|
15) |
Demonstrate functional interaction by using strategic decision making processes in solving problems encountered in the field. |
|
16) |
Contribute to the solution finding process regarding social, scientific, cultural and ethical problems in the field and support the development of these values. |
|