| COMPUTER ENGINEERING (ENGLISH, PHD) | |||||
| PhD | TR-NQF-HE: Level 8 | QF-EHEA: Third Cycle | EQF-LLL: Level 8 | ||
| Course Code | Course Name | Semester | Theoretical | Practical | Credit | ECTS |
| INE5261 | Multi Attribute Decision Making | Fall Spring |
3 | 0 | 3 | 12 |
| The course opens with the approval of the Department at the beginning of each semester |
| Language of instruction: | En |
| Type of course: | Departmental Elective |
| Course Level: | |
| Mode of Delivery: | Face to face |
| Course Coordinator : | Dr. Öğr. Üyesi JBİD ANİ ARSENYAN ÜŞENMEZ |
| Course Lecturer(s): |
Dr. Öğr. Üyesi YÜCEL BATU SALMAN |
| Course Objectives: | This course aims to build up the multi-attribute decision making concept by defining the decision making problem with its various constituents. |
|
The students who have succeeded in this course; Understand the nature of decision making Structure and model multi-attribute decision making problems Select the most appropriate method to solve multi-attribute problems Integrate the preferences of a group of decision makers Solve real world problems having conflicting criteria |
| The course includes various multi-attribute decision making tools and techniques such as elementary methods, value based methods, and outranking methods in order to help industrial engineering students to handle real-life problems with a scientific approach. |
| Week | Subject | Related Preparation | |
| 1) | Decision analysis | ||
| 2) | Utility theory | ||
| 3) | Multi attribute decision making | ||
| 4) | Structuring the problem | ||
| 5) | Elementary methods | ||
| 7) | Value-based methods | ||
| 8) | Midterm | ||
| 9) | Outranking methods | ||
| 10) | Group Decision Making | ||
| 11) | Fuzzy Approach to MADM | ||
| 12) | Applications | ||
| 13) | Project presentations | ||
| 14) | Project presentations | ||
| Course Notes: | Multiple Attribute Decision Making: An Introduction K . P. Yoon, and C.-L.Hwang 1995 978-0803954861 |
| References: | Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach V. Belton, and T.J. Stewart 2003 0-7923-7505-X The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resource allocation T.L. Saaty 1990 978-0070543713 Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs R.L. Keeney, and H. Raiffa 1993 978-0521438834 The Analytic Network Process: Decision Making With Dependence and Feedback T.L. Saaty 1996 978-0962031793 |
| Semester Requirements | Number of Activities | Level of Contribution |
| Attendance | % 0 | |
| Laboratory | % 0 | |
| Application | % 0 | |
| Field Work | % 0 | |
| Special Course Internship (Work Placement) | % 0 | |
| Quizzes | % 0 | |
| Homework Assignments | % 0 | |
| Presentation | % 0 | |
| Project | 1 | % 35 |
| Seminar | % 0 | |
| Midterms | 1 | % 25 |
| Preliminary Jury | % 0 | |
| Final | 1 | % 40 |
| Paper Submission | % 0 | |
| Jury | % 0 | |
| Bütünleme | % 0 | |
| Total | % 100 | |
| PERCENTAGE OF SEMESTER WORK | % 25 | |
| PERCENTAGE OF FINAL WORK | % 75 | |
| Total | % 100 | |
| Activities | Number of Activities | Duration (Hours) | Workload |
| Course Hours | 14 | 3 | 42 |
| Laboratory | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Application | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Special Course Internship (Work Placement) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Field Work | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Study Hours Out of Class | 12 | 6 | 72 |
| Presentations / Seminar | 1 | 15 | 15 |
| Project | 1 | 60 | 60 |
| Homework Assignments | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Quizzes | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Preliminary Jury | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Midterms | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| Paper Submission | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jury | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Final | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| Total Workload | 193 | ||
| No Effect | 1 Lowest | 2 Low | 3 Average | 4 High | 5 Highest |
| Program Outcomes | Level of Contribution | |
| 1) | Ability to identify and apply advanced concepts in computer engineering | |
| 2) | Cooperate efficiently in intra-disciplinary and multi-disciplinary teams. | |
| 3) | Have theoretical and practical basis in computer engineering and science to be able to conduct related academic research independently. | |
| 4) | Ability to apply advanced mathematical and engineering knowledge on real problems. | |
| 5) | Ability to search the scientific literature related to a research project and find the relationships with own research | |
| 6) | Ability to interprete scientific research and use the findings | |
| 7) | Ability to work efficiently in interdisciplinary research teams | |
| 8) | Ability to attain scientific knowledge | |
| 9) | Ability find ways to improve upon current knowledge | |
| 10) | Ability to present research findings in seminars and conferences | |
| 11) | Ability to write research progress reports by referring to published theses and papers. | |
| 12) | Ability to show the responsibility of professional and ethical behavior |