| EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY (ENGLISH, THESIS) | |||||
| Master | TR-NQF-HE: Level 7 | QF-EHEA: Second Cycle | EQF-LLL: Level 7 | ||
| Course Code | Course Name | Semester | Theoretical | Practical | Credit | ECTS |
| EDT5888-2 | Master's Thesis | Spring | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30 |
| Prerequisites: |
|
| The course opens with the approval of the Department at the beginning of each semester |
| Language of instruction: | En |
| Type of course: | Must Course |
| Course Level: | |
| Mode of Delivery: | Face to face |
| Course Coordinator : | Prof. Dr. TUFAN ADIGÜZEL |
| Course Objectives: | The aim of this Module is to provide the student with an opportunity to independently research, investigate, critically evaluate and formally present a study of an issue in the selected topic. |
|
The students who have succeeded in this course; The students who succeeded in this course; 1. Apply appropriate research methods to the investigation and study of a practical, theoretical, case study or applied investigation of an area of study. 2. Critically evaluate the research method and findings and place it in the context of the field of study. 3. Construct a coherent and cogent dissertation to report the findings of the investigation. |
| Conduct and write up a research investigation or an experimental research investigation. |
| Week | Subject | Related Preparation | |
| 1) | Extended literature review | ||
| 2) | Extended literature review | ||
| 3) | Extended literature review | ||
| 4) | Extended literature review | ||
| 5) | Investigation | ||
| 6) | Investigation | ||
| 7) | Data Collection | ||
| 8) | Data Collection | ||
| 9) | Analysis and evaluation of data or results | ||
| 10) | Analysis and evaluation of data or results | ||
| 11) | Construct a draft Thesis | ||
| 12) | Construct a draft Thesis | ||
| 13) | Construct and submit the final Dissertation | ||
| 14) | Construct and submit the final Dissertation | ||
| Course Notes: | Rudestam, K. E., & Newton R. R. (2000). Surviving Your Dissertation: A Comprehensive Guide to Content and Process. Sage Publications: UK Sharp, J. A., Peters, J., & Howard, K. (2002). The management of a student research project. Gower: Aldershot. |
| References: |
| Semester Requirements | Number of Activities | Level of Contribution |
| Attendance | % 0 | |
| Laboratory | % 0 | |
| Application | % 0 | |
| Field Work | % 0 | |
| Special Course Internship (Work Placement) | % 0 | |
| Quizzes | % 0 | |
| Homework Assignments | % 0 | |
| Presentation | % 0 | |
| Project | 1 | % 100 |
| Seminar | % 0 | |
| Midterms | % 0 | |
| Preliminary Jury | % 0 | |
| Final | % 0 | |
| Paper Submission | % 0 | |
| Jury | % 0 | |
| Bütünleme | % 0 | |
| Total | % 100 | |
| PERCENTAGE OF SEMESTER WORK | % 0 | |
| PERCENTAGE OF FINAL WORK | % 100 | |
| Total | % 100 | |
| Activities | Number of Activities | Duration (Hours) | Workload |
| Course Hours | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Laboratory | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Application | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Special Course Internship (Work Placement) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Field Work | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Study Hours Out of Class | 1 | 250 | 250 |
| Presentations / Seminar | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Project | 1 | 500 | 500 |
| Homework Assignments | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Quizzes | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Preliminary Jury | 0 | ||
| Midterms | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Paper Submission | 0 | ||
| Jury | 0 | ||
| Final | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total Workload | 750 | ||
| No Effect | 1 Lowest | 2 Low | 3 Average | 4 High | 5 Highest |
| Program Outcomes | Level of Contribution | |
| 1) | Being able to develop and deepen their knowledge at the level of expertise in the same or a different field, based on undergraduate level qualifications. | |
| 2) | To be able to comprehend the interdisciplinary interaction with which the field is related. | |
| 3) | To be able to use the theoretical and applied knowledge at the level of expertise acquired in the field. | |
| 4) | To be able to interpret and create new knowledge by integrating the knowledge gained in the field with the knowledge from different disciplines. | |
| 5) | To be able to solve the problems encountered in the field by using research methods. | |
| 6) | To be able to systematically transfer current developments in the field and their own studies to groups in and outside the field, in written, verbal and visual forms, by supporting them with quantitative and qualitative data. | |
| 7) | To be able to critically examine social relations and the norms that guide these relations, to develop them and take action to change them when necessary. | |
| 8) | To be able to critically evaluate the knowledge and skills acquired in the field of expertise and to direct their learning. | |
| 9) | To be able to supervise and teach these values by observing social, scientific, cultural and ethical values in the stages of collecting, interpreting, applying and announcing the data related to the field. | |
| 10) | To be able to develop strategy, policy and implementation plans in the fields related to the field and to evaluate the obtained results within the framework of quality processes. | |
| 11) | To be able to use the knowledge, problem solving and/or application skills they have internalized in their field in interdisciplinary studies. | |
| 12) | Being able to independently carry out a work that requires expertise in the field. | |
| 13) | To be able to develop new strategic approaches for the solution of complex and unpredictable problems encountered in applications related to the field and to produce solutions by taking responsibility. | |
| 14) | Being able to lead in environments that require the resolution of problems related to the field. |