EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY (ENGLISH, THESIS) | |||||
Master | TR-NQF-HE: Level 7 | QF-EHEA: Second Cycle | EQF-LLL: Level 7 |
Course Code | Course Name | Semester | Theoretical | Practical | Credit | ECTS |
EDT5015 | Technology Management in Organizations | Fall | 3 | 0 | 3 | 7 |
The course opens with the approval of the Department at the beginning of each semester |
Language of instruction: | En |
Type of course: | Departmental Elective |
Course Level: | |
Mode of Delivery: | Face to face |
Course Coordinator : | Dr. Öğr. Üyesi YAVUZ SAMUR |
Course Objectives: | To purpose of this course is to provide educators with both the theoretical and the practical competencies for planning, implementing and managing technology in educational organizations. |
The students who have succeeded in this course; o Define basic concepts related to technology planning and management, o Explain models related to technology planning and management, o Analyze factors of effective to technology management in organizations, o Evaluate process of technology planning and management in various organizations. |
Basic concepts, models and strategies related to planning and management of technology in organizations. Technology integration models and technology acceptance model. Critical factors and innovations in technology management. Selecting and using technology in organizations; multimedia, the Internet, distance learning, web 2.0. Competencies of leaders, technology coordinators and educator for technology transfer, adaptation and management. Planning, developing and evaluating technology applications in organizations: hardware, software, staff development, facilities, and finances. Examining related case studies. |
Week | Subject | Related Preparation | |
1) | Introduction | ||
2) | Basic concepts related to planning and management of technology in organizations. | ||
3) | Models and strategies related to planning and management of technology in organizations. | ||
4) | Technology integration models | ||
5) | Technology acceptance model | ||
6) | Technology competencies for educators | ||
7) | Selecting and using technology: New technologies | ||
8) | Selecting and using technology: New technologies | ||
9) | Planning, developing and evaluating technology applications in organizations | ||
10) | Planning, developing and evaluating technology applications in organizations | ||
11) | Planning, developing and evaluating technology applications in organizations | ||
12) | Examining related case studies. | ||
13) | Examining related case studies. | ||
14) | Examining related case studies. |
Course Notes: | Anthony G. Picciano, A.G. (2010). Educational Leadership and Planning for Technology (5th Edition), USA: Prentice Hall |
References: | Law, N., Yuen, A. & Fox, R. (2011). Educational Innovations Beyond Technology: Nurturing Leadership and Establishing Learning Organizations. USA: Springer. |
Semester Requirements | Number of Activities | Level of Contribution |
Attendance | 14 | % 10 |
Laboratory | % 0 | |
Application | % 0 | |
Field Work | 1 | % 20 |
Special Course Internship (Work Placement) | % 0 | |
Quizzes | % 0 | |
Homework Assignments | 2 | % 10 |
Presentation | 2 | % 10 |
Project | 1 | % 50 |
Seminar | % 0 | |
Midterms | % 0 | |
Preliminary Jury | % 0 | |
Final | % 0 | |
Paper Submission | % 0 | |
Jury | % 0 | |
Bütünleme | % 0 | |
Total | % 100 | |
PERCENTAGE OF SEMESTER WORK | % 50 | |
PERCENTAGE OF FINAL WORK | % 50 | |
Total | % 100 |
Activities | Number of Activities | Duration (Hours) | Workload |
Course Hours | 14 | 3 | 42 |
Laboratory | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Application | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Special Course Internship (Work Placement) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Field Work | 1 | 40 | 40 |
Study Hours Out of Class | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Presentations / Seminar | 2 | 12 | 24 |
Project | 1 | 60 | 60 |
Homework Assignments | 2 | 12 | 24 |
Quizzes | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Preliminary Jury | 0 | ||
Midterms | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Paper Submission | 0 | ||
Jury | 0 | ||
Final | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total Workload | 190 |
No Effect | 1 Lowest | 2 Low | 3 Average | 4 High | 5 Highest |
Program Outcomes | Level of Contribution | |
1) | Being able to develop and deepen their knowledge at the level of expertise in the same or a different field, based on undergraduate level qualifications. | |
2) | To be able to comprehend the interdisciplinary interaction with which the field is related. | |
3) | To be able to use the theoretical and applied knowledge at the level of expertise acquired in the field. | |
4) | To be able to interpret and create new knowledge by integrating the knowledge gained in the field with the knowledge from different disciplines. | |
5) | To be able to solve the problems encountered in the field by using research methods. | |
6) | To be able to systematically transfer current developments in the field and their own studies to groups in and outside the field, in written, verbal and visual forms, by supporting them with quantitative and qualitative data. | |
7) | To be able to critically examine social relations and the norms that guide these relations, to develop them and take action to change them when necessary. | |
8) | To be able to critically evaluate the knowledge and skills acquired in the field of expertise and to direct their learning. | |
9) | To be able to supervise and teach these values by observing social, scientific, cultural and ethical values in the stages of collecting, interpreting, applying and announcing the data related to the field. | |
10) | To be able to develop strategy, policy and implementation plans in the fields related to the field and to evaluate the obtained results within the framework of quality processes. | |
11) | To be able to use the knowledge, problem solving and/or application skills they have internalized in their field in interdisciplinary studies. | |
12) | Being able to independently carry out a work that requires expertise in the field. | |
13) | To be able to develop new strategic approaches for the solution of complex and unpredictable problems encountered in applications related to the field and to produce solutions by taking responsibility. | |
14) | Being able to lead in environments that require the resolution of problems related to the field. |