EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY (ENGLISH, THESIS) | |||||
Master | TR-NQF-HE: Level 7 | QF-EHEA: Second Cycle | EQF-LLL: Level 7 |
Course Code | Course Name | Semester | Theoretical | Practical | Credit | ECTS |
EDT5008 | Advanced Instructional Design | Spring | 3 | 0 | 3 | 8 |
The course opens with the approval of the Department at the beginning of each semester |
Language of instruction: | En |
Type of course: | Departmental Elective |
Course Level: | |
Mode of Delivery: | Face to face |
Course Coordinator : | Prof. Dr. TUFAN ADIGÜZEL |
Course Objectives: | The overall course objectives are to: -Identify factors that must be incorporated into instructional design processes and products to be consistent with various learning theories (such as behaviorism, Gagne’s theory of instruction, constructivism, motivational theory…etc.) -Analyze a design problem based on various theories. -Analyze instructional materials to identify characteristics representative of particular theories. -Apply the Rapid-prototyping strategy. |
The students who have succeeded in this course; 1. to be able to discuss basic assumptions, concepts, and principles of different paradigms of learning, including foundational theories, behavioral psychology, cognitive information processing, developmental theories, motivational theory, and theories of instruction. 2. to be able to compare and contrast theories within and across paradigms for strengths, weaknesses, and applicability 3. to be able to determine the implications of theory for instructional design 4. to be able to formulate and revise personal theories of learning and determine implications 5. to be able to articulate changes in personal epistemology over the course 6. to be able to analyze a design problem based on various theories 7. to be able to identify factors that must be incorporated into instructional design processes and products to be consistent with selected theory 8. to be able to analyze current instructional design model to determine which models are most consistent with which theories. 9. to be able to use rapid-prototyping as a method in instructional design |
Bu ders öğretimsel tasarımda temel öğrenme teorilerinin (Davranışçı yaklaşım, sistem teorisi, iletişim teorisi, öğrenme teorileri, & öğretim teorileri) uygulamalı olarak teknoloji temelli öğrenme materyallerinde incelenmesini ve kullanılmasını amaçlamaktadır. |
Week | Subject | Related Preparation | |
1) | Introduction to course and overview | ||
2) | Introduction to the learning theories | ||
3) | Gagne’s Nine Event of Instruction & Davranışçı Yaklaşım | ||
4) | Presentations on Behaviorism | ||
5) | Cognitive Information Processing | ||
6) | Presentations on Cognitive Information Processing | ||
7) | Meaningful Learning & Schema Theory | ||
8) | Presentations on Meaningful Learning & Schema Theory | ||
9) | Constructivism | ||
10) | Presentations on Constructivism | ||
11) | Rapid prototyping | ||
12) | Presentations on Rapid Prototyping | ||
13) | Motivational Theory | ||
14) | Presentations on Motivational Theory |
Course Notes: | Driscoll, M. P. (2004). Psychology of Learning for Instruction. 3rd Edition. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Ertmer & Quinn. (2007). The ID Casebook: Case Studies in Instructional Design. 3rd ed/ Pearson. |
References: | - |
Semester Requirements | Number of Activities | Level of Contribution |
Attendance | 14 | % 10 |
Laboratory | % 0 | |
Application | % 0 | |
Field Work | % 0 | |
Special Course Internship (Work Placement) | % 0 | |
Quizzes | % 0 | |
Homework Assignments | 2 | % 20 |
Presentation | 6 | % 30 |
Project | 1 | % 40 |
Seminar | % 0 | |
Midterms | % 0 | |
Preliminary Jury | % 0 | |
Final | % 0 | |
Paper Submission | % 0 | |
Jury | % 0 | |
Bütünleme | % 0 | |
Total | % 100 | |
PERCENTAGE OF SEMESTER WORK | % 60 | |
PERCENTAGE OF FINAL WORK | % 40 | |
Total | % 100 |
Activities | Number of Activities | Duration (Hours) | Workload |
Course Hours | 14 | 3 | 42 |
Laboratory | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Application | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Special Course Internship (Work Placement) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Field Work | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Study Hours Out of Class | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Presentations / Seminar | 6 | 10 | 60 |
Project | 1 | 60 | 60 |
Homework Assignments | 1 | 30 | 30 |
Quizzes | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Preliminary Jury | 0 | ||
Midterms | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Paper Submission | 0 | ||
Jury | 0 | ||
Final | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total Workload | 192 |
No Effect | 1 Lowest | 2 Low | 3 Average | 4 High | 5 Highest |
Program Outcomes | Level of Contribution | |
1) | Being able to develop and deepen their knowledge at the level of expertise in the same or a different field, based on undergraduate level qualifications. | |
2) | To be able to comprehend the interdisciplinary interaction with which the field is related. | |
3) | To be able to use the theoretical and applied knowledge at the level of expertise acquired in the field. | |
4) | To be able to interpret and create new knowledge by integrating the knowledge gained in the field with the knowledge from different disciplines. | |
5) | To be able to solve the problems encountered in the field by using research methods. | |
6) | To be able to systematically transfer current developments in the field and their own studies to groups in and outside the field, in written, verbal and visual forms, by supporting them with quantitative and qualitative data. | |
7) | To be able to critically examine social relations and the norms that guide these relations, to develop them and take action to change them when necessary. | |
8) | To be able to critically evaluate the knowledge and skills acquired in the field of expertise and to direct their learning. | |
9) | To be able to supervise and teach these values by observing social, scientific, cultural and ethical values in the stages of collecting, interpreting, applying and announcing the data related to the field. | |
10) | To be able to develop strategy, policy and implementation plans in the fields related to the field and to evaluate the obtained results within the framework of quality processes. | |
11) | To be able to use the knowledge, problem solving and/or application skills they have internalized in their field in interdisciplinary studies. | |
12) | Being able to independently carry out a work that requires expertise in the field. | |
13) | To be able to develop new strategic approaches for the solution of complex and unpredictable problems encountered in applications related to the field and to produce solutions by taking responsibility. | |
14) | Being able to lead in environments that require the resolution of problems related to the field. |