| INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY LAW (TURKISH, NONTHESIS) | |||||
| Master | TR-NQF-HE: Level 7 | QF-EHEA: Second Cycle | EQF-LLL: Level 7 | ||
| Course Code | Course Name | Semester | Theoretical | Practical | Credit | ECTS |
| OHK5126 | Mediation in Legal Disputes | Fall | 3 | 0 | 3 | 8 |
| This catalog is for information purposes. Course status is determined by the relevant department at the beginning of semester. |
| Language of instruction: | Turkish |
| Type of course: | Departmental Elective |
| Course Level: | |
| Mode of Delivery: | Face to face |
| Course Coordinator : | Assoc. Prof. MELİS TAŞPOLAT TUĞSAVUL |
| Course Objectives: | Acquiring knowledge about Principles Regarding the Preparation of Contracts for the International Sale of Goods and the Determination of the Law to be Applied in Case of Dispute. |
|
The students who have succeeded in this course; Learns the concept of alternative dispute resolution methods and mediation, which is the basic model of these ways.To reveal the emergence and history of alternative dispute resolution methods and the concept of mediation.Learns the difference of the mediation institution from similar institutions.Learns the provisions of the Mediation Law No. 6325.Within the framework of the provisions of the Mediation Law, it determines its connection with other relevant areas of law, especially the Civil Procedure Law and the Enforcement and Bankruptcy Law. |
| he diversity of problems arising from the developments in science and technology and the rapid development of economic and social relations has led to the necessity of seeking fast, effective and permanent ways to solve these problems. Mediation is the main model of alternative dispute resolution methods within the framework of resolving disputes with the help of a third party and the institution that contains all the features of these methods. It is seen that the mediation method has a great importance in obtaining peaceful solutions in international relations in recent years as well as in legal relations. In this context, it is possible to define mediation as a method, which is not limited to the legal framework, to which the parties apply with their free will, which does not have the authority to force the parties to accept its decision on the subject of the dispute or has limited authority to force them to accept it, and which aims to end the disputes in a peaceful manner acceptable to both parties with the support of a third party. In Turkish law, especially in line with the developments in the world, steps have been taken to put mediation on a legal basis. Within the scope of the course, all the features of the mediation institution will be discussed together with the features of dispute resolution and the changes in the law in recent years. |
| Week | Subject | Related Preparation |
| 1) | Introduction -Alternative Dispute Resolution Methods - The Concept of Mediation | |
| 2) | Development of Alternative Dispute Resolution Methods and Mediation in the World and Turkey - Legal Regulations | |
| 3) | The Place of Mediation in Alternative Dispute Resolution Types and Regulations Similar to Mediation Method in Turkish Law | |
| 4) | Institutional Structure of Mediation - Principles Governing the Mediation Institution | |
| 5) | Field of Application of Mediation - Determination of Suitability for Mediation | |
| 6) | Mediation agreement - Mediator Agreement | |
| 7) | Mediation Process (Optional Mediation-Conditional Mediation) | |
| 8) | Mediation Process ( Optional Mediation-Conditional Mediation) | |
| 9) | Application Areas of Litigation Mediation | |
| 10) | Legal Qualification of the Mediator, Conditions for Acting as a Mediator | |
| 11) | Mediation Agreement Document and its Legal Nature | |
| 12) | Rights and Obligations of the Mediator, Mediation Code of Ethics | |
| 13) | Singapore Convention | |
| 14) | Final Exam Evaluation |
| Course Notes / Textbooks: | |
| References: | EKMEKÇİ Ömer/ÖZEKES Muhammet/ATALI Murat/ SEVEN Vural, Hukuk Uyuşmazlıklarında Arabuluculuk, 2.Bası, İstanbul 2019; KURU Baki, Hukuk Uyuşmazlıklarında Arabuluculuk Kanunu Tasarısı Hakkında Görüş ve Öneriler, Medenî Usûl ve İcra İflâs Hukuku Dergisi, Yıl: 2010, C.6; S. 16, s. 237-246; ÖZBEK Mustafa Serdar, Alternatif Uyuşmazlık Çözümü, Ankara 2022;ÖZBEK Mustafa Serdar, Arabuluculuk Sonunda Düzenlenen Anlaşma Belgesine İcra Edilebilirlik Şerhi Verilmesinde Görevli ve Yetkili Mahkeme, Başkent Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, C.3, S.2, Temmuz 2017, s. 69-85; ÖZEKES Muhammet, Pekcanıtez Usûl Medenî Usûl Hukuku, 15. Bası, İstanbul 2017; ÖZEL Sibel, Arabuluculuk Sonunda Yapılan Milletlerarası Sulh Anlaşmaları Hakkında Birleşmiş Milletler Sözleşmesi: Sinagapur Konvansiyonu, Marmara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Hukuk Araştırmaları Dergisi, C. 25, S.2, Aralık 2019, s. 1190-1210;ÖZMUMCU Seda, Arabuluculuk Modelleri, İstanbul 2021;ÖZMUMCU Seda, Karşılaştırmalı Hukuk ve Türk Hukuku Açısından Zorunlu Arabuluculuk Sistemine Genel Bakış, İÜHFM C. LXXIV, S.2, 2016, s. 807-842; ÖZMUMCU Seda, Uzakdoğu’da Arabuluculuk Anlayışı ile Türk Hukuk Sisteminde Arabuluculuk Kurumuna Genel Bir Bakış, 2. Bası, İstanbul, 2012;ÖZTEK Selçuk, Arabuluculuk Kurumunun Ülkemizdeki Tarihçesine Kısa Bir Genel Bakış, Prof. Dr. Necmettin M. Berkin’e Armağan, İstanbul 2021, s.893-910;PEKCANITEZ Hakan, Alternatif Uyuşmazlık Çözüm Yöntemleri, HPD, 2005/5, s.12-16.TANRIVER Süha, Hukuk Uyuşmazlıkları Bağlamında Arabuluculuk, 2.Bası, Ankara 2022; TANRIVER Süha, Alternatif Uyuşmazlık Çözümleri, Ankara 2023 (Alternatif Uyuşmazlık Çözümleri);TAŞPOLAT TUĞSAVUL, Türk Hukukunda Arabuluculuk (6325 sayılı Hukuk Uyuşmazlıklarında Arabuluculuk Kanunu Çerçevesinde), Ankara 2012;TAŞPOLAT TUĞSAVUL Melis, Arabuluculuk Faaliyeti Sonunda Varılan Anlaşmanın Hukuki Niteliği, Galatasaray Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 2019/1, s. 333-379; YAZICI TIKTIK Çiğdem, Arabuluculukta Gizliliğin Korunması, İstanbul 2013. |
| Semester Requirements | Number of Activities | Level of Contribution |
| Homework Assignments | 1 | % 45 |
| Presentation | 1 | % 5 |
| Final | 1 | % 50 |
| Total | % 100 | |
| PERCENTAGE OF SEMESTER WORK | % 50 | |
| PERCENTAGE OF FINAL WORK | % 50 | |
| Total | % 100 | |
| Activities | Number of Activities | Duration (Hours) | Workload |
| Course Hours | 14 | 3 | 42 |
| Study Hours Out of Class | 10 | 10 | 100 |
| Presentations / Seminar | 10 | 3 | 30 |
| Homework Assignments | 10 | 3 | 30 |
| Final | 1 | 3 | 3 |
| Total Workload | 205 | ||
| No Effect | 1 Lowest | 2 Low | 3 Average | 4 High | 5 Highest |
| Program Outcomes | Level of Contribution | |
| 1) | Being able to develop and deepen their knowledge at the level of expertise in the same or a different field, based on undergraduate level qualifications. | 4 |
| 1) | To be able to interpret and create new knowledge by integrating the knowledge gained in the field with the knowledge from different disciplines, | 4 |
| 1) | To be able to systematically transfer current developments in the field and their own studies to groups in and outside the field, in written, verbal and visual forms, by supporting them with quantitative and qualitative data. | 4 |
| 1) | To be able to critically evaluate the knowledge and skills acquired in the field of expertise and to direct their learning. | 5 |
| 1) | To be able to supervise and teach these values by observing social, scientific, cultural and ethical values in the stages of collecting, interpreting, applying and announcing the data related to the field. | 5 |
| 1) | Being able to independently carry out a work that requires expertise in the field. | 5 |
| 2) | To be able to critically examine social relations and the norms that guide these relations, to develop them and take action to change them when necessary. | 4 |
| 2) | To be able to comprehend the interdisciplinary interaction with which the field is related. | 4 |
| 2) | To be able to develop strategy, policy and implementation plans in the fields related to the field and to evaluate the obtained results within the framework of quality processes. | 5 |
| 2) | To be able to use the theoretical and applied knowledge at the level of expertise acquired in the field. | 4 |
| 2) | To be able to develop new strategic approaches for the solution of complex and unpredictable problems encountered in applications related to the field and to produce solutions by taking responsibility. | 4 |
| 3) | Being able to lead in environments that require the resolution of problems related to the field. | 5 |
| 3) | To be able to solve the problems encountered in the field by using research methods. | 4 |
| 3) | To be able to use the knowledge, problem solving and/or application skills they have internalized in their field in interdisciplinary studies. | 4 |