| PRIVATE LAW (TURKISH, PHD) | |||||
| PhD | TR-NQF-HE: Level 8 | QF-EHEA: Third Cycle | EQF-LLL: Level 8 | ||
| Course Code | Course Name | Semester | Theoretical | Practical | Credit | ECTS |
| HUK6011 | Liability Law | Fall | 3 | 0 | 3 | 9 |
| Language of instruction: | Turkish |
| Type of course: | Must Course |
| Course Level: | |
| Mode of Delivery: | Face to face |
| Course Coordinator : | Prof. Dr. KADİR EMRE GÖKYAYLA |
| Course Lecturer(s): |
Prof. Dr. KADİR EMRE GÖKYAYLA |
| Recommended Optional Program Components: | None. |
| Course Objectives: | In this course it will be focused on the concept and the meaning of "responsibility". Basic regulations concerning responsability are within the scope of the tort law provisions of the Turkish Code of Obligations. However, these porvisions are applicable as well as in tort law and in the violation of the contract. Students will acquire adequate information about those provisions which have a wide area of application. |
|
The students who have succeeded in this course; Learn about the basic concepts of responsibility. Learn about the general legislation on liability law. |
| 1. Concept of "responsibility" in general and the meaning of the law of responsibility. 2. Elements of tort liability. 3. The proof of the damage and fault. 4. Determination of compensation, in particular the reasons for deduction from compensation. 5. Determination of compensation for death and bodily harm. 6. Non-pecuniary damage, injury of the personality rights. 7. Concurrence of responsibility reasons and joint and several liability. 8. Reasons for compliance with the law. 9. Strict liability and its types. 10. Liability for usual circumstances. 11. Danger responsibility. 12. Prescription and the relationship of the responsibilities with criminal law. 13. Provisional payments. 14. Examples from practice . |
| Week | Subject | Related Preparation |
| 1) | Concept of "responsibility" in general and the meaning of the law of responsibility. | None |
| 2) | Elements of tort liability. | None |
| 3) | The proof of the damage and fault. | None |
| 4) | Determination of compensation, in particular the reasons for deduction from compensation. | None |
| 5) | Determination of compensation for death and bodily harm. | None |
| 6) | Non-pecuniary damage, injury of the personality rights. | None |
| 7) | Concurrence of responsibility reasons and joint and several liability. | None |
| 8) | Reasons for compliance with the law. | None |
| 9) | Strict liability and its types. | None |
| 10) | Liability for usual circumstances. | None |
| 11) | Danger responsibility. | None |
| 12) | Prescription and the relationship of the responsibilities with criminal law. | None |
| 13) | Provisional payments. | None |
| 14) | Examples from practice. | None |
| Course Notes / Textbooks: | Yok / None. |
| References: | Haluk Tandoğan: Türk Mes'uliyet Hukuku, İstanbul 2010. Haluk Tandoğan: Kusura Dayanmayan Sözleşme Dışı Sorumluluk Hukuku, Ankara 1981. Mustafa Reşit Karahasan: Sorumluluk Hukuku, İstanbul 2003. Emre Gökyayla: Destekten Yoksun Kalma Tazminatı, İstanbul 2004. Tüm borçlar hukuku genel hükümler kitapları. |
| Semester Requirements | Number of Activities | Level of Contribution |
| Attendance | 1 | % 10 |
| Presentation | 1 | % 30 |
| Midterms | 1 | % 0 |
| Final | 1 | % 60 |
| Total | % 100 | |
| PERCENTAGE OF SEMESTER WORK | % 40 | |
| PERCENTAGE OF FINAL WORK | % 60 | |
| Total | % 100 | |
| Activities | Number of Activities | Duration (Hours) | Workload |
| Course Hours | 14 | 3 | 42 |
| Study Hours Out of Class | 14 | 4 | 56 |
| Presentations / Seminar | 14 | 5 | 70 |
| Final | 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Total Workload | 175 | ||
| No Effect | 1 Lowest | 2 Low | 3 Average | 4 High | 5 Highest |
| Program Outcomes | Level of Contribution | |
| 1) | The student who completed this program, 1) will have adequate ability to screen and to evaluate information/data resources like libraries, judicial decisions and database | 5 |
| 2) | 2) can follow legal innovations, produce legal solution to the changing/developing needs | 5 |
| 3) | 3) can share and discuss with colleagues his/her knowledge, opinion and experiences | 5 |
| 4) | 4) can synthesize by establishing a liaison between different doctrinal opinions and different legal texts | 5 |
| 5) | 5) can acquire the sufficient knowledge to specialize at the legal area he/she prefers to work | 4 |