TEXTILE AND FASHION DESIGN | |||||
Bachelor | TR-NQF-HE: Level 6 | QF-EHEA: First Cycle | EQF-LLL: Level 6 |
Course Code | Course Name | Semester | Theoretical | Practical | Credit | ECTS |
SOC3091 | Readings in Urban Studies | Spring | 3 | 0 | 3 | 5 |
This catalog is for information purposes. Course status is determined by the relevant department at the beginning of semester. |
Language of instruction: | English |
Type of course: | Non-Departmental Elective |
Course Level: | Bachelor’s Degree (First Cycle) |
Mode of Delivery: | Face to face |
Course Coordinator : | Assist. Prof. İLHAN ZEYNEP KARAKILIÇ |
Recommended Optional Program Components: | "." |
Course Objectives: | In this course, students will learn about walking as a sociological method and the transformation of Istanbul after 1950s, but especially after 1980s with the effects of neoliberal economic policies implemented in Turkey. The course is not only related with İstanbul or urban sociology but also walking, experiencing and using this experience as a source for sociological imagination. In this respect, active participation in the class requires at least weekly 2-3 hours walks in İstanbul. Throughout the course, it is aimed to show students the ways of understanding transformation of İstanbul and its residents while they are strolling in the city. The course aims to introduce students the concepts such as walking as a method, urbanization, urban transformation, urban renewal, displacement, and differentiation. |
The students who have succeeded in this course; Students' achievements at the end of this course will be: 1. To understand what walking as a sociological method is, 2. To learn about the transformation of urban space with the example of İstanbul 3. To see how Istanbul is affected by globalization economically and spatially 4. To understand important urban sociology readings 5. To increase capacity for sociological imagination in the urban context. |
In this course, students will learn about walking as a sociological method and the transformation of Istanbul after 1950s, but especially after 1980s with the effects of neoliberal economic policies implemented in Turkey. The teaching methods of this course are cooperative learning, lecture, reading, discussion, project, fieldtrip, fieldwork and individual learning methods. |
Week | Subject | Related Preparation |
1) | Orientation | |
2) | Walking as a sociological method 1 | |
3) | Walking as a sociological method 2 | |
4) | Walking as a sociological method 3 | |
5) | Walking as a sociological method 4 | |
6) | Neighborhood as a community | |
7) | Producing Urban Space | |
8) | Modernization of İstanbul | |
9) | Globalization of İstanbul | |
10) | Change in İstanbul 1 | |
11) | Change in İstanbul 2 | |
12) | Change in İstanbul 3 | |
13) | Change in İstanbul 4 | |
14) | Overview and Discussion |
Course Notes / Textbooks: | 1. Week: Meeting with the class and examining the course syllabus Mills, C.W. (1959). “Appendix: On Intellectual Craftsmanship” in the Sociological Imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. 195-227. 2. Week: Walking as a sociological method 1 O’Neill, M. and B. Roberts (2020). “Methods on the Move: Moving Methods”, “Theorising Walking in the Sociological Imagination” in Walking Methods, Research on the Move. New York: Routledge. Pp. 13-71 3. Week: Walking as a sociological method 2 Wang, T. (2012). “Writing live fieldnotes: Towards a more open ethnography”. Ethnography Matters. https://ethnographymatters.net/blog/2012/08/02/writing-live-fieldnotes-towards-a-more-open-ethnography/ Middleton, J. (2010). “Sense and the city: Exploring the Embodied Geographies of Urban Walking”, Social and Cultural Geography, 11(6):575-596. 4.Week: Walking as a sociological method 3 Jung, Y. (2014). “Mindful walking: The serendipitous journey of community-based ethnography”, Qualitative Inquiry, 20(5), 621-627. Kusenbach, M. (2003). “Street phenomenology”, Ethnography, 4(3):455-485. 5. Week: Walking as a sociological method 4 Svensson M. (2021): “Walking in the historic neighbourhoods of Beijing: walking as an embodied encounter with heritage and urban developments”, International Journal of Heritage Studies, 27(8): 792-805. Berardi, L. (2021). Neighborhood wisdom: an ethnographic study of localized street knowledge. Qualitative Sociology, 44(1), 103-124. 6. Neighborhood and Community Jacobs, J. (2013). “The Uses of City Neighborhoods” in The Urban Sociology Reader by J. Lin and C. Mele London: Routledge. Pp. 50-58 7. Producing Urban Space Harvey, D. (2013) “The Urban Process under Capitalism: A Framework for Analysis” in The Urban Sociology Reader by J. Lin and C. Mele London: Routledge. Pp. 100-108. Logan, J. and H. Molotch (2013). “The City as a Growth Machine” in The Urban Sociology Reader by J. Lin and C. Mele London: Routledge. Pp. 109-118. 8 . Modernization of İstanbul Tekeli, İ. (2010). “The Story of İstanbul’s Modernization”, Architectural Design, 80(1):32-39. Karpat, K. (2004). “The Genesis of the Gecekondu: Rural Migration and Urbanization (1976)”, European Journal of Turkish Studies.1-16. 9.Week: Globalization of İstanbul Keyder, Ç. (1999). “The Setting”. In "İstanbul, Between the Global and the Local" edited by Keyder. New York: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers. Pp. 1-28. Erder, S. (1999). “Where do you hail from?". In "İstanbul, Between the Global and the Local", edited by Ç. Keyder. New York: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers. Pp 161-171. 10.Week: Change in Istanbul 1 Kuyucu, T. and Ö. Ünsal (2009). “‘Urban Transformation’ as State-led Property Transfer: An Analysis of Two Cases of Urban Renewal in Istanbul", Urban Studies, 47(7): 1479-1499. 11. Week: Change in İstanbul 2 Bartu-Candan, A. and B. Kolluoğlu (2008). “Emerging Spaces of Neoliberalism: a Gated Town and a Public Housing Project in İstanbul”, New Perspectives in Turkey, 39: 5-46. 12. Week: Change in İstanbul 3 Mills, A. (2006). “Boundaries of the nation in the space of the urban: landscape and social memory in Istanbul”, Cultural Geographies, 13: 367-394. 13. Week: Change in İstanbul 4 Erbaş, A.E. (2019). “Cultural Heritage Conservation and Culture-Led Tourism Conflict Within the Historic Site in Beyoğlu, İstanbul”, Sustainable Development and Planning, 10:647-659. Walton, J.F. (2021). “Silhouettes and Submersions: Istanbul's Past from Above and Below”, Journal of the Ottoman and Turkish Studies Association, 8(1):11-22. s notu yoktur. |
References: | 1. Week: Meeting with the class and examining the course syllabus Mills, C.W. (1959). “Appendix: On Intellectual Craftsmanship” in the Sociological Imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. 195-227. 2. Week: Walking as a sociological method 1 O’Neill, M. and B. Roberts (2020). “Methods on the Move: Moving Methods”, “Theorising Walking in the Sociological Imagination” in Walking Methods, Research on the Move. New York: Routledge. Pp. 13-71 3. Week: Walking as a sociological method 2 Wang, T. (2012). “Writing live fieldnotes: Towards a more open ethnography”. Ethnography Matters. https://ethnographymatters.net/blog/2012/08/02/writing-live-fieldnotes-towards-a-more-open-ethnography/ Middleton, J. (2010). “Sense and the city: Exploring the Embodied Geographies of Urban Walking”, Social and Cultural Geography, 11(6):575-596. 4.Week: Walking as a sociological method 3 Jung, Y. (2014). “Mindful walking: The serendipitous journey of community-based ethnography”, Qualitative Inquiry, 20(5), 621-627. Kusenbach, M. (2003). “Street phenomenology”, Ethnography, 4(3):455-485. 5. Week: Walking as a sociological method 4 Svensson M. (2021): “Walking in the historic neighbourhoods of Beijing: walking as an embodied encounter with heritage and urban developments”, International Journal of Heritage Studies, 27(8): 792-805. Berardi, L. (2021). Neighborhood wisdom: an ethnographic study of localized street knowledge. Qualitative Sociology, 44(1), 103-124. 6. Neighborhood and Community Jacobs, J. (2013). “The Uses of City Neighborhoods” in The Urban Sociology Reader by J. Lin and C. Mele London: Routledge. Pp. 50-58 7. Producing Urban Space Harvey, D. (2013) “The Urban Process under Capitalism: A Framework for Analysis” in The Urban Sociology Reader by J. Lin and C. Mele London: Routledge. Pp. 100-108. Logan, J. and H. Molotch (2013). “The City as a Growth Machine” in The Urban Sociology Reader by J. Lin and C. Mele London: Routledge. Pp. 109-118. 8 . Modernization of İstanbul Tekeli, İ. (2010). “The Story of İstanbul’s Modernization”, Architectural Design, 80(1):32-39. Karpat, K. (2004). “The Genesis of the Gecekondu: Rural Migration and Urbanization (1976)”, European Journal of Turkish Studies.1-16. 9.Week: Globalization of İstanbul Keyder, Ç. (1999). “The Setting”. In "İstanbul, Between the Global and the Local" edited by Keyder. New York: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers. Pp. 1-28. Erder, S. (1999). “Where do you hail from?". In "İstanbul, Between the Global and the Local", edited by Ç. Keyder. New York: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers. Pp 161-171. 10.Week: Change in Istanbul 1 Kuyucu, T. and Ö. Ünsal (2009). “‘Urban Transformation’ as State-led Property Transfer: An Analysis of Two Cases of Urban Renewal in Istanbul", Urban Studies, 47(7): 1479-1499. 11. Week: Change in İstanbul 2 Bartu-Candan, A. and B. Kolluoğlu (2008). “Emerging Spaces of Neoliberalism: a Gated Town and a Public Housing Project in İstanbul”, New Perspectives in Turkey, 39: 5-46. 12. Week: Change in İstanbul 3 Mills, A. (2006). “Boundaries of the nation in the space of the urban: landscape and social memory in Istanbul”, Cultural Geographies, 13: 367-394. 13. Week: Change in İstanbul 4 Erbaş, A.E. (2019). “Cultural Heritage Conservation and Culture-Led Tourism Conflict Within the Historic Site in Beyoğlu, İstanbul”, Sustainable Development and Planning, 10:647-659. Walton, J.F. (2021). “Silhouettes and Submersions: Istanbul's Past from Above and Below”, Journal of the Ottoman and Turkish Studies Association, 8(1):11-22. |
Semester Requirements | Number of Activities | Level of Contribution |
Application | 1 | % 20 |
Field Work | 5 | % 25 |
Homework Assignments | 1 | % 15 |
Final | 1 | % 40 |
Total | % 100 | |
PERCENTAGE OF SEMESTER WORK | % 60 | |
PERCENTAGE OF FINAL WORK | % 40 | |
Total | % 100 |
Activities | Number of Activities | Duration (Hours) | Workload |
Course Hours | 14 | 3 | 42 |
Study Hours Out of Class | 14 | 2 | 28 |
Project | 3 | 10 | 30 |
Quizzes | 5 | 5 | 25 |
Total Workload | 125 |
No Effect | 1 Lowest | 2 Low | 3 Average | 4 High | 5 Highest |
Program Outcomes | Level of Contribution | |
1) | Understands the principles of artistic creation and basic design and applies the art and design objects he creates within this framework. | |
2) | Conducts the multifaceted research required for textile and fashion design processes and analyzes and interprets the results. | |
3) | Creates original and applicable fabric, clothing and pattern designs by using elements from different historical periods and cultures in accordance with his purpose. | |
4) | Recognizes textile raw materials and equipments. | |
5) | Uses computer programs effectively in the garment and fabric surface design process. | |
6) | Has professional technical knowledge regarding the implementation of clothing designs and production; In this context, recognizes and uses technological tools and equipment. | |
7) | Understands the importance of interdisciplinary interaction and communication in textile and clothing design-production-presentation processes and reflects this on the processes. | |
8) | Works in a programmed and disciplined manner in professional practices. | |
9) | Realizes the necessity of lifelong learning to maintain his productivity, creativity and professional competence. | |
10) | Understands, adopts and applies ethical responsibilities in professional practices; Has knowledge of relevant legal regulations. | |
11) | Establishes effective visual, written and verbal communication in the field of textile and fashion design. | |
12) | Reflects his knowledge on current and contemporary issues from all fields to his professional theoretical and practical studies on textile and clothing design; Understands the social and universal effects of these issues. | |
13) | Has sufficient awareness about social justice, environmental awareness, quality culture and protection of cultural values. |