| Week |
Subject |
Related Preparation |
| 1) |
Opening Lecture
Istanbul: An Urban Commentary |
|
| 2) |
Lecture: Concept of Urban Space- Transition from Byzantine to Ottoman |
Kafesçioğlu, Çiğdem, " Viewing, Walking, Mapping Istanbul, ca. 1580", Mitteilungen des Kunsthistorischen Institutes in Florenz, 56. Bd., H. 1, Littoral andLiminal Spaces The Early Modern Mediterranean and Beyond (2014), pp. 16-35 |
| 3) |
Destination I. Byzantine+Ottoman Public Spaces: Hippodrome and its Environs, St. Sophia |
Altinyildiz, Nur. “The Architectural Heritage of Istanbul and the Ideology of Preservation.” Muqarnas, vol. 24, 2007, pp. 281–305.
2. Aykaç, Pınar. “Musealization as an Urban Process: The Transformation of the Sultanahmet District in Istanbul’s Historic Peninsula.” Journal of Urban History, vol. 45, no. 6, Nov. 2019, pp. 1246–1272.
|
| 4) |
Destination II: Framing the Byzantine and Ottoman Layers , Visit to the City Walls |
Baş Bütüner, Funda, "Old City Walls as Public Spaces in Istanbul", Public Istanbul, Spaces and Sphere of the Urban, Frank Eckardt, Kathrin Wildner (eds.), Transcript Verlag, Bielefeld, 2008, pp.141-162. |
| 5) |
Lecture: MODERN ISTANBUL, 18th century and on |
Reading 1. Hamadeh, Shirine. “Splash and Spectacle: The Obsession with Fountains in Eighteenth-Century Istanbul.” Muqarnas, vol. 19, 2002, pp. 123–148.
2. Dinçkal, Noyan. “Reluctant Modernization: The Cultural Dynamics of Water Supply in Istanbul, 1885-1950.” Technology and Culture, vol. 49, no. 3, 2008, pp. 675–700
|
| 6) |
Destination III: Laleli and Beyazıt monuments and their environs |
Akpınar, İpek, "Urbanization represented in the Historical Peninsula Turkification of Istanbul in the 1950s", in Meltem Gürel (ed.) Mid-Century Modernism in Turkey: Architecture Across Cultures in the 1950s and 1960s, Research in Architecture, Routledge- Taylor and Francis Group, London, September 2015, pp.56-84 |
| 7) |
Destination IV: Hybrid Identities: Karaköy-Galata-Tophane |
Schuitema, Karin, "Negotiation of the Past and Identities in a Changing Urban Landscape: A Multivocal History of Tophane", History Takes Place: Istanbul, Anna Hofmann / Ayşe Öncü (eds.), Jovis Verlag, 2015, pp.134-149. |
| 8) |
Destination V: Postwar Modernism and Contemporary Architecture, İMÇ, Istanbul Municipality, SGK Complex |
Tureli, Ipek, "Architecture as advertising: The Istanbul Reklam Building", in Meltem Gürel (ed.) Mid-Century Modernism in Turkey: Architecture Across Cultures in the 1950s and 1960s, Research in Architecture, Routledge- Taylor and Francis Group, London, September 2015, pp.163-185 |
| 9) |
Lecture: Contemporary Istanbul, 21st century |
Keyder, Çağlar, "Introduction", Istanbul Between Global and the Local, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc, 1999, pp.3-26 |
| 10) |
Destination VI: Neoliberal city, gentrification of the historical neighborhoods |
İpek Türeli, "Exhibiting Vernacular Architecture" |
| 11) |
NATINAL HOLIDAY / NO CLASS |
|
| 12) |
Student Presentations |
|
| 13) |
STUDENT PRESENTATIONS |
|
| 14) |
Final submissions |
|
| Course Notes / Textbooks: |
Doğan Kuban, İstanbul Yazıları; İstanbul Ansiklopedisi, Stefanos Yerasimos, İstanbul (İmparatorluk Başkenti), İstanbul, 2010; Çeçen, Kazım, Mimar Sinan ve Kırkçeş
me Tesisleri,İstanbul 1988;Çeçen, Kazım, İstanbul’un Osmanlı
Dönemi Su Yolları,İstanbul 2000;Demir, Ataman. “Haliç Bölgesinde Su Mimarisi Eserleri”, Haliç 2001 Sempozyumu,İstanbul 2001. Nirven, Saadi Nazım,İstanbul suları,İstanbul 1946; Oğuz, Burhan. Bizans’tan Günümüze İstanbul Suları, İstanbul, 1998;Öziş, Ünal - Arısoy, Yalçın, “Mimar Sinan’ın Su İletim Sistemleri” Mimar Sinan DönemiTürk Mimarlığı ve Sanatı Sempozyumu, İstanbul 1988; Sönmez, Zeki. Mimar Sinan İle İlgili Tarihi Yazmalar-Belgeler, İstanbul, 1988; |
| References: |
Ayverdi, Ekrem Hakkı, Fâtih Devri Mîmârîsi, İstanbul, 1953;Ayverdi, Ekrem Hakkı,Fâtih Devri Mîmârî Eserleri, İstanbul, 1953;Ayverdi, Ekrem Hakkı,"Fatih Devrinde İstanbul Mahalleleri, Şehrin İskânı ve Nüfûsu", Vakıflar Dergisi, Sayı: IV. Ankara, 1958, s. 245 - 261;Ayverdi, Ekrem Hakkı, XIX. Asırda İstanbul Haritası, İstanbul, 1958;Ayverdi, Ekrem Hakkı,Fâtih Devri Mîmârîsi Zeyli, İstanbul, 1960;Ayverdi, Ekrem Hakkı, Osmanlı Mîmârîsinde Fâtih Devri, C. III, İstanbul,1973; Ayverdi, Ekrem Hakkı, Osmanlı Mîmârîsinde Fâtih Devri, C. IV, İstanbul, 1974; Ayverdi, Ekrem Hakkı,İstanbul Vakıfları Tahrir Defteri, ( Ö.L. Barkan İle ) İstanbul, 1970. |
| |
Program Outcomes |
Level of Contribution |
| 1) |
Develops the conceptual/theoretical and practical knowledge gained in undergraduate level to higher proficiency level. |
4 |
| 2) |
Be able to conduct researches at proficiency level in Architecture and related disciplines individually and participate or take responsibility in groups. |
3 |
| 3) |
Demostrate an ability to develop new approaches and produce knowledge at proficiency level researches both in architecture and related disciplines. |
2 |
| 4) |
Apply critical thinking methods , identify, formulate, and effectively communicate the critical issues involved in the solution of design problems. |
3 |
| 5) |
Evaluate the phenomena in Architectural History and analyse historical, social, political backgrounds of the contemporary developments . |
5 |
| 6) |
Be able to conduct qualitatif and quantitatif researches on the discipline of Architecture. |
3 |
| 7) |
Be able to communicate the results of his researches, design proposals , conceptual and practical thoughts in the field of architecture using written, oral, visual media |
3 |
| 8) |
Develops the lifelong learning abilities. |
2 |
| 9) |
Engage social, legal, ethical and aesthetical responsibility in the discipline of architecture. |
4 |