| INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING (ENGLISH, PHD) | |||||
| PhD | TR-NQF-HE: Level 8 | QF-EHEA: Third Cycle | EQF-LLL: Level 8 | ||
| Course Code | Course Name | Semester | Theoretical | Practical | Credit | ECTS |
| INE5261 | Multi Attribute Decision Making | Spring | 3 | 0 | 3 | 12 |
| This catalog is for information purposes. Course status is determined by the relevant department at the beginning of semester. |
| Language of instruction: | English |
| Type of course: | Departmental Elective |
| Course Level: | |
| Mode of Delivery: | Face to face |
| Course Coordinator : | Assist. Prof. JBİD ANİ ARSENYAN ÜŞENMEZ |
| Course Lecturer(s): |
Assist. Prof. YÜCEL BATU SALMAN |
| Recommended Optional Program Components: | None |
| Course Objectives: | This course aims to build up the multi-attribute decision making concept by defining the decision making problem with its various constituents. |
|
The students who have succeeded in this course; Understand the nature of decision making Structure and model multi-attribute decision making problems Select the most appropriate method to solve multi-attribute problems Integrate the preferences of a group of decision makers Solve real world problems having conflicting criteria |
| The course includes various multi-attribute decision making tools and techniques such as elementary methods, value based methods, and outranking methods in order to help industrial engineering students to handle real-life problems with a scientific approach. |
| Week | Subject | Related Preparation |
| 1) | Decision analysis | |
| 2) | Utility theory | |
| 3) | Multi attribute decision making | |
| 4) | Structuring the problem | |
| 5) | Elementary methods | |
| 7) | Value-based methods | |
| 8) | Midterm | |
| 9) | Outranking methods | |
| 10) | Group Decision Making | |
| 11) | Fuzzy Approach to MADM | |
| 12) | Applications | |
| 13) | Project presentations | |
| 14) | Project presentations |
| Course Notes / Textbooks: | Multiple Attribute Decision Making: An Introduction K . P. Yoon, and C.-L.Hwang 1995 978-0803954861 |
| References: | Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach V. Belton, and T.J. Stewart 2003 0-7923-7505-X The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resource allocation T.L. Saaty 1990 978-0070543713 Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs R.L. Keeney, and H. Raiffa 1993 978-0521438834 The Analytic Network Process: Decision Making With Dependence and Feedback T.L. Saaty 1996 978-0962031793 |
| Semester Requirements | Number of Activities | Level of Contribution |
| Project | 1 | % 35 |
| Midterms | 1 | % 25 |
| Final | 1 | % 40 |
| Total | % 100 | |
| PERCENTAGE OF SEMESTER WORK | % 25 | |
| PERCENTAGE OF FINAL WORK | % 75 | |
| Total | % 100 | |
| Activities | Number of Activities | Duration (Hours) | Workload |
| Course Hours | 14 | 3 | 42 |
| Study Hours Out of Class | 12 | 6 | 72 |
| Presentations / Seminar | 1 | 15 | 15 |
| Project | 1 | 60 | 60 |
| Midterms | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| Final | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| Total Workload | 193 | ||
| No Effect | 1 Lowest | 2 Low | 3 Average | 4 High | 5 Highest |
| Program Outcomes | Level of Contribution | |
| 1) | To understand and implement areas that are related with basic sciences, mathematics, and industrial engineering at a high level. | |
| 2) | To have expanded and deeper knowledge in the related field including the most recent developments. | |
| 3) | To use and evaluate knowledge with a systematic approach. | |
| 4) | To have high level proficiency of necessary methods and skills to reach the latest knowledge in the field and to understand the knowledge for making research studies. | |
| 5) | To make a comprehensive study innovating science and technology, developing new scientific method or technological product/process, implementing a known method to a new field. | |
| 6) | To be able to detect, design, implement, and finalize an original independent research process; to manage this process | |
| 7) | To be able to contribute science and technology by publishing outcomes of academic studies in reputable scholarly environments. | |
| 8) | To be able to evaluate scientific, technological, social and cultural developments, and to transfer these developments to society with scientific objectivity and ethical responsibility. | |
| 9) | To be able to conduct critical analysis, synthesis and evaluation of thoughts and developments in focusing field. | |
| 10) | To be Able to communicate and discuss orally, in written and visually with peers by using a foreign language at least at a level of European Language Portfolio C1 General Level. | |
| 11) | To be able to conduct functional interaction to solve the problems related to the field by using the strategic decision making processes | |
| 12) | To have effective and efficient management capabilities |