Week |
Subject |
Related Preparation |
1) |
Introduction to the Course |
Academic Articles ann related books |
2) |
Foreign Policy Analysis: Approaches and Concepts |
J. David Singer, “The Level of Analysis Problem in International Relations,” in G. John Ikenberry (ed.), American Foreign Policy: Theoretical Essays (Glenview, IL, 2008), 67-80.
Charles F. Hermann, “Changing Course: When Governments Choose to Redirect Foreign Policy,” International Studies Quarterly (1990), Vol. 34,
3-21.
Laura Neack, The New Foreign Policy: U.S. and Comparative Foreign Policy in the 21st Century (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2003).
Valerie M. Hudson, Foreign Policy Analysis: Classic and Contemporary Theory (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2007).
|
3) |
The Historical Context |
Roderic Davison, “Ottoman Diplomacy and Its Legacy,” in Carl Brown (ed.), Imperial Legacy (New York: Columbia University Press, 1996), 174-199.
Selim Deringil, Turkish Foreign Policy During Second World War: An ‘Active Neutrality’, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), 133-188.
William Hale, Turkish Foreign Policy, 1774-2000 (London: Frank Cass,
2000).
Andrew Mango, Atatürk (London: John Murray, 1999). |
4) |
Turkey and the Cold War |
Bruce Kuniholm, “Turkey and the West Since World War II,” in Vojtech Mastny and R. Craig Nation (eds.), Turkey Between the East and West (Boulder, CO: Westview, 1996), 45-70.
Paul Kubicek, “Turkey’s Inclusion in the Atlantic Community: Looking Back, Looking Forward,” Turkish Studies (March 2008), 21-36
Bruce Kuniholm, The Origins of the Cold War in the Near East: Great Power Conflict and Diplomacy in Iran, Turkey, and Greece (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1980).
George S. Harris, Troubled Alliance: Turkish-American Problems in Historical Perspective (Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute, 1972).
|
5) |
Trends in the Post-Cold War Era |
Sabri Sayarı, “Turkish Foreign Policy in the Post-Cold War Era: The Challenges of Multi-Regionalism,” Journal of International Affairs (Fall 2000), 169-182.
Alan Makovsky, “The New Activism in Turkish Foreign Policy,” SAIS Review (Winter-Spring 1999), 92-113.
Berdal Aral, “Dispensing with Tradition?: Turkish Politics and International Society during the Özal Decade, 1983-93,” Middle Eastern Studies (January 2001), 72-88.
Alan Makovsky and Sabri Sayarı (eds.), Turkey’s New World: Changing Dynamics in Turkish Foreign Policy (Washington, D.C.: The Washington Institute for Near East Policy, 2000).
F. Stephen Larrabee and Ian O. Lesser, Turkish Foreign Policy in an Age of Uncertainty (Santa Monica: CA: RAND, 2003).
|
6) |
Domestic Politics and Foreign Policy |
Ahmet Davutoğlu, “Turkey’s New Foreign Policy Vision,” Insight Turkey
10, no. 1 (2008), 77-96.
Tarık Oğuzlu, “Middle Easternization of Turkey’s Foreign Policy: Does Turkey Disassociate from the West?” Turkish Studies ((March 2008), 3-20.
Kemal Kirişçi, “The Transformation of Turkish Foreign Policy: The Rise of the Trading State,” New Perspectives on Turkey (Spring 2009), 29-56
Kemal Kirişçi and Gareth M. Winrow, The Kurdish Question and Turkey: An Example of a Trans-state Ethnic Conflict (London: Frank Cass, 1997).
Yücel Bozdağlıoğlu, Turkish Foreign Policy and Turkish Identity: A Constructivist Approach (London: Routledge, 2003).
|
7) |
Key Players and Processes of Foreign Policy-Making |
Gencer Özcan, “Facing its Waterloo in Diplomacy: Turkey’s Military in the Foreign Policy Making Process,” New Perspectives on Turkey (Spring 2009), 83-102.
M. Fatih Tayfur and Korel Göymen, “Decision-Making in Turkish Foreign Policy: The Caspian Oil Pipeline Issue,” Middle Eastern Studies (April 2002), 101-22.
Baris Kesgin and Juliet Kaarbo, “When and How Parliaments Influence Foreign Policy: The Case of Turkey’s Iraq Decision,” International Studies Perspectives (February, 2010), 19-36.
Malik Mufti, Daring and Caution in Turkish Strategic Culture: The Republic at Sea (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009).
Philip Robins, Suits and Uniforms: Turkish Foreign Policy Since the Cold War (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2003).
|
8) |
Turkey and the Middle East |
Malik Mufti, “From Swamp to Backyard: The Middle East in Turkish Foreign Policy,” in Robert O. Friedman (ed.), The Middle East Enters the Twenty-First Century (Gainesville, Florida: University of Florida Press, 2002), 80-110.
Meliha Benli Altunışık, “Worldviews and Turkish Foreign Policy in the Middle East,” New Perspectives on Turkey (Spring 2009), 169-192.
Nihat Ali Özcan and Özgür Özdamar, “Uneasy Neighbors: Turkish-Iranian Relations Since the 1979 Iranian Revolution,” Middle East Policy
(Fall 2010), 101-117.
Hasan Kösebalan, “The Crisis in Turkish-Israeli Relations: What Is Its Strategic Significance,” Middle East Policy (Fall 2010).
William Hale, Turkey, the US and Iraq (London: SOAS, 2007).
Dietrich Jung with Wolfgang Piccoli, Turkey at the Crossroads: Otoman Legacies and the Greater Middle East (London: Zed Boks, 2001).
|
9) |
Turkey and the Middle East |
Malik Mufti, “From Swamp to Backyard: The Middle East in Turkish Foreign Policy,” in Robert O. Friedman (ed.), The Middle East Enters the Twenty-First Century (Gainesville, Florida: University of Florida Press, 2002), 80-110.
Meliha Benli Altunışık, “Worldviews and Turkish Foreign Policy in the Middle East,” New Perspectives on Turkey (Spring 2009), 169-192.
Nihat Ali Özcan and Özgür Özdamar, “Uneasy Neighbors: Turkish-Iranian Relations Since the 1979 Iranian Revolution,” Middle East Policy
(Fall 2010), 101-117.
Hasan Kösebalan, “The Crisis in Turkish-Israeli Relations: What Is Its Strategic Significance,” Middle East Policy (Fall 2010).
William Hale, Turkey, the US and Iraq (London: SOAS, 2007).
Dietrich Jung with Wolfgang Piccoli, Turkey at the Crossroads: Otoman Legacies and the Greater Middle East (London: Zed Boks, 2001). |
10) |
Greek-Turkish Relations |
Ziya Öniş and Şuhnaz Yılmaz, “Greek-Turkish Rapprochement: Rhetoric or Reality?” Political Science Quarterly (2008), 123-149.
Müge Kınacıoğlu and Emel Oktay, “The Domestic Dynamics of Turkey’s Cyprus Policy: Implications for Turkey’s Accession to the European Union,” Turkish Studies (June 2006), 261-274
Mustafa Aydın and Kostas Ifintis (eds.), Turkish-Greek Relations: The Security Dilemma in the Aegean (London: Routledge, 2002).
Dimitris Kerides and Dimitrios Triantaphyllou (eds.) Greek-Turkish Relations in the Era of Globalization (London: Brassey’s 2001). |
11) |
Turkey and Eurasia: Relations with Russia, the Caucasus, and Central Asia |
Fionna Hill and Ömer Taşpınar, “Turkey and Russia: Axis of the Excluded?” Survival (Spring 2006), 81-92.
Carol R. Saivetz, “Tangled Pipelines: Turkey’s Role in Energy Export Plans,” Turkish Studies (March 2009), 95-108.
Mustafa Aydın, “Foucault’s Pendulum: Turkey in Central Asia and the Caucasus,” Turkish Studies (Summer 2004), 1-22.
Robert Ebel and Rejan Menon (eds.), Energy and Conflict in Central Asia and the Caucasus (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2000).
Idris Bal, Turkey’s Relations with the West and the Turkic Republics (Burlington, Vermont: Ashgate, 2000).
|
12) |
Turkey and Europe: The Issue of Turkish Accession |
John Redmond, “Turkey and the European Union: Troubled European or European Trouble?” International Affairs, (2007), 305-317.
Lauren M. McLaren, “Explaining Opposition to Turkish Membership of the EU,” European Union Politics (June 2007), 251-278.
Sabri Sayarı, “Challenges of Triangular Relations: The US, the EU, and Turkish Accession,” South European Society and Politics (June 2011), 251-264.
Ali Çarkoğlu and Barry Rubin (eds.), Turkey and the European Union (London: Frank Cass, 2005).
S.J. Joseph, Turkey and the European Union: Internal Dynamics and External Challenges (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007). |
13) |
Turkey and the United States |
Sabri Sayarı, “Turkish-American Relations in the Post-Cold War Era: Issues of Convergence and Divergence,” in Mustafa Aydın and Çağrı Erhan (eds.), Turkish-American Relations: Past, Present, and Future (London: Routledge, 2004), 91-106.
Morton Abramowitz, “The Complexities of American Policymaking on Turkey,” in Abramowitz (ed.), Turkey’s Transformation and American Policy (New York: The Century Foundation Press, 2000), 153-184.
James E. Kapsis, “From Desert Storm to Metal Storm: How Iraq Has Spoiled US-Turkish Relations,” Current History (November 2005), 380-388.
Philip Gordon and Ömer Taşpınar, Winning Turkey: How America, Europe, and Turkey Can Revive a Fading Relationship (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institute, 2008).
Council on Foreign Relations, U.S.-Turkey Relations: A New Partnership (New York, 2012).
|
14) |
Conclusions |
Academic Articles and related books |
|
Program Outcomes |
Level of Contribution |
1) |
Setting up various spaces in national and international contexts, carrying out designs, planning and applications that could satisfy various user groups and respond various requirements in the field of Interior Architecture, |
|
2) |
Analyzing the information gathered from the framework of actual physical, social and economical constraints and user requirements, and synthesizing these with diverse knowledge and considerations in order to create innovative spatial solutions, |
|
3) |
Generating creative, innovative, aesthetic and unique spatial solutions by using tangible and abstract concepts, |
|
4) |
Using at least one of the illustration and presentation technologies competently, that the field of interior architecture requires, |
|
5) |
Reporting, presenting and transferring the design, practice and research studies to the specialists or laymen by using visual, textual or oral communication methods, efficiently and accurately, |
|
6) |
Embracing and prioritizing man-environment relationships, user health, safety and security, and universal design principles in the field of interior architecture, |
|
7) |
Design understanding and decision making that respects social and cultural rights of the society, cultural heritage and nature, |
|
8) |
Being aware of national and international values, following developments and being equipped about ethical and aesthetical subjects in the fields of interior architecture, design and art, |
|
9) |
Having absolute conscious about legal regulations, standards and principles; and realizing professional ethics, duties and responsibilities in the field of Interior Architecture, |
|