| EUROPEAN UNION RELATIONS | |||||
| Bachelor | TR-NQF-HE: Level 6 | QF-EHEA: First Cycle | EQF-LLL: Level 6 | ||
| Course Code | Course Name | Semester | Theoretical | Practical | Credit | ECTS |
| EDT5008 | Advanced Instructional Design | Spring | 3 | 0 | 3 | 12 |
| This catalog is for information purposes. Course status is determined by the relevant department at the beginning of semester. |
| Language of instruction: | English |
| Type of course: | Non-Departmental Elective |
| Course Level: | Bachelor’s Degree (First Cycle) |
| Mode of Delivery: | Face to face |
| Course Coordinator : | Prof. Dr. TUFAN ADIGÜZEL |
| Recommended Optional Program Components: | None |
| Course Objectives: | The overall course objectives are to: -Identify factors that must be incorporated into instructional design processes and products to be consistent with various learning theories (such as behaviorism, Gagne’s theory of instruction, constructivism, motivational theory…etc.) -Analyze a design problem based on various theories. -Analyze instructional materials to identify characteristics representative of particular theories. -Apply the Rapid-prototyping strategy. |
|
The students who have succeeded in this course; 1. to be able to discuss basic assumptions, concepts, and principles of different paradigms of learning, including foundational theories, behavioral psychology, cognitive information processing, developmental theories, motivational theory, and theories of instruction. 2. to be able to compare and contrast theories within and across paradigms for strengths, weaknesses, and applicability 3. to be able to determine the implications of theory for instructional design 4. to be able to formulate and revise personal theories of learning and determine implications 5. to be able to articulate changes in personal epistemology over the course 6. to be able to analyze a design problem based on various theories 7. to be able to identify factors that must be incorporated into instructional design processes and products to be consistent with selected theory 8. to be able to analyze current instructional design model to determine which models are most consistent with which theories. 9. to be able to use rapid-prototyping as a method in instructional design |
| Bu ders öğretimsel tasarımda temel öğrenme teorilerinin (Davranışçı yaklaşım, sistem teorisi, iletişim teorisi, öğrenme teorileri, & öğretim teorileri) uygulamalı olarak teknoloji temelli öğrenme materyallerinde incelenmesini ve kullanılmasını amaçlamaktadır. |
| Week | Subject | Related Preparation |
| 1) | Introduction to course and overview | |
| 2) | Introduction to the learning theories | |
| 3) | Gagne’s Nine Event of Instruction & Davranışçı Yaklaşım | |
| 4) | Presentations on Behaviorism | |
| 5) | Cognitive Information Processing | |
| 6) | Presentations on Cognitive Information Processing | |
| 7) | Meaningful Learning & Schema Theory | |
| 8) | Presentations on Meaningful Learning & Schema Theory | |
| 9) | Constructivism | |
| 10) | Presentations on Constructivism | |
| 11) | Rapid prototyping | |
| 12) | Presentations on Rapid Prototyping | |
| 13) | Motivational Theory | |
| 14) | Presentations on Motivational Theory |
| Course Notes / Textbooks: | Driscoll, M. P. (2004). Psychology of Learning for Instruction. 3rd Edition. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Ertmer & Quinn. (2007). The ID Casebook: Case Studies in Instructional Design. 3rd ed/ Pearson. |
| References: | - |
| Semester Requirements | Number of Activities | Level of Contribution |
| Attendance | 14 | % 10 |
| Homework Assignments | 2 | % 20 |
| Presentation | 6 | % 30 |
| Project | 1 | % 40 |
| Total | % 100 | |
| PERCENTAGE OF SEMESTER WORK | % 60 | |
| PERCENTAGE OF FINAL WORK | % 40 | |
| Total | % 100 | |
| Activities | Number of Activities | Duration (Hours) | Workload |
| Course Hours | 14 | 3 | 42 |
| Presentations / Seminar | 6 | 10 | 60 |
| Project | 1 | 60 | 60 |
| Homework Assignments | 1 | 30 | 30 |
| Total Workload | 192 | ||
| No Effect | 1 Lowest | 2 Low | 3 Average | 4 High | 5 Highest |
| Program Outcomes | Level of Contribution | |
| 1) | To be able to examine, interpret data and assess ideas with the scientific methods in the area of EU studies. | 2 |
| 2) | To be able to inform authorities and institutions in the area of EU studies, to be able to transfer ideas and proposals supported by quantitative and qualitative data about the problems. | 2 |
| 3) | To be introduced to and to get involved in other disciplines that EU studies are strongly related with (political science, international relations, law, economics, sociology, etc.) and to be able to conduct multi-disciplinary research and analysis on European politics. | 3 |
| 4) | To be able to evaluate current news on European Union and Turkey-EU relations and identify, analyze current issues relating to the EU’s politics and policies. | 2 |
| 5) | To be able to use English in written and oral communication in general and in the field of EU studies in particular. | 1 |
| 6) | To have ethical, social and scientific values throughout the processes of collecting, interpreting, disseminating and implementing data related to EU studies. | 1 |
| 7) | To be able to assess the historical development, functioning of the institutions and decision-making system and common policies of the European Union throughout its economic and political integration in a supranational framework. | 2 |
| 8) | To be able to evaluate the current legal, financial and institutional changes that the EU is going through. | 2 |
| 9) | To explain the dynamics of enlargement processes of the EU by identifying the main actors and institutions involved and compare previous enlargement processes and accession process of Turkey. | 2 |
| 10) | To be able to analyze the influence of the EU on political, social and economic system of Turkey. | 2 |
| 11) | To acquire insight in EU project culture and to build up project preparation skills in line with EU format and develop the ability to work in groups and cooperate with peers. | 2 |
| 12) | To be able to recognize theories and concepts used by the discipline of international relations and relate them to the historical development of the EU as a unique post-War political project. | 3 |