| AMERICAN CULTURE AND LITERATURE | |||||
| Bachelor | TR-NQF-HE: Level 6 | QF-EHEA: First Cycle | EQF-LLL: Level 6 | ||
| Course Code | Course Name | Semester | Theoretical | Practical | Credit | ECTS |
| EDT5008 | Advanced Instructional Design | Spring | 3 | 0 | 3 | 12 |
| This catalog is for information purposes. Course status is determined by the relevant department at the beginning of semester. |
| Language of instruction: | English |
| Type of course: | Non-Departmental Elective |
| Course Level: | Bachelor’s Degree (First Cycle) |
| Mode of Delivery: | Face to face |
| Course Coordinator : | Prof. Dr. TUFAN ADIGÜZEL |
| Recommended Optional Program Components: | None |
| Course Objectives: | The overall course objectives are to: -Identify factors that must be incorporated into instructional design processes and products to be consistent with various learning theories (such as behaviorism, Gagne’s theory of instruction, constructivism, motivational theory…etc.) -Analyze a design problem based on various theories. -Analyze instructional materials to identify characteristics representative of particular theories. -Apply the Rapid-prototyping strategy. |
|
The students who have succeeded in this course; 1. to be able to discuss basic assumptions, concepts, and principles of different paradigms of learning, including foundational theories, behavioral psychology, cognitive information processing, developmental theories, motivational theory, and theories of instruction. 2. to be able to compare and contrast theories within and across paradigms for strengths, weaknesses, and applicability 3. to be able to determine the implications of theory for instructional design 4. to be able to formulate and revise personal theories of learning and determine implications 5. to be able to articulate changes in personal epistemology over the course 6. to be able to analyze a design problem based on various theories 7. to be able to identify factors that must be incorporated into instructional design processes and products to be consistent with selected theory 8. to be able to analyze current instructional design model to determine which models are most consistent with which theories. 9. to be able to use rapid-prototyping as a method in instructional design |
| Bu ders öğretimsel tasarımda temel öğrenme teorilerinin (Davranışçı yaklaşım, sistem teorisi, iletişim teorisi, öğrenme teorileri, & öğretim teorileri) uygulamalı olarak teknoloji temelli öğrenme materyallerinde incelenmesini ve kullanılmasını amaçlamaktadır. |
| Week | Subject | Related Preparation |
| 1) | Introduction to course and overview | |
| 2) | Introduction to the learning theories | |
| 3) | Gagne’s Nine Event of Instruction & Davranışçı Yaklaşım | |
| 4) | Presentations on Behaviorism | |
| 5) | Cognitive Information Processing | |
| 6) | Presentations on Cognitive Information Processing | |
| 7) | Meaningful Learning & Schema Theory | |
| 8) | Presentations on Meaningful Learning & Schema Theory | |
| 9) | Constructivism | |
| 10) | Presentations on Constructivism | |
| 11) | Rapid prototyping | |
| 12) | Presentations on Rapid Prototyping | |
| 13) | Motivational Theory | |
| 14) | Presentations on Motivational Theory |
| Course Notes / Textbooks: | Driscoll, M. P. (2004). Psychology of Learning for Instruction. 3rd Edition. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Ertmer & Quinn. (2007). The ID Casebook: Case Studies in Instructional Design. 3rd ed/ Pearson. |
| References: | - |
| Semester Requirements | Number of Activities | Level of Contribution |
| Attendance | 14 | % 10 |
| Homework Assignments | 2 | % 20 |
| Presentation | 6 | % 30 |
| Project | 1 | % 40 |
| Total | % 100 | |
| PERCENTAGE OF SEMESTER WORK | % 60 | |
| PERCENTAGE OF FINAL WORK | % 40 | |
| Total | % 100 | |
| Activities | Number of Activities | Duration (Hours) | Workload |
| Course Hours | 14 | 3 | 42 |
| Presentations / Seminar | 6 | 10 | 60 |
| Project | 1 | 60 | 60 |
| Homework Assignments | 1 | 30 | 30 |
| Total Workload | 192 | ||
| No Effect | 1 Lowest | 2 Low | 3 Average | 4 High | 5 Highest |
| Program Outcomes | Level of Contribution | |
| 1) | Upon graduation, students will acquire key skills and attributes to conduct research to use research tools, to solve problems, to communicate effectively and to transfer skills to the workplace. | |
| 2) | Upon graduation, students will have developed the ability to discuss key issues in fluent English. | |
| 3) | Upon graduation, students will have developed the ability to compose written documents in English with a mature prose style. | 4 |
| 4) | Upon graduation, students will have gained broad knowledge of the American and English literary canons. | 4 |
| 5) | Upon graduation, students will have developed the ability to analyze, synthesize and criticize sophisticated works of American and English literature. | 4 |
| 6) | Upon graduation, students will have achieved in depth the understanding of contemporary American culture. | 3 |
| 7) | Upon graduation, students will have developed the ability to draw links among diverse literary texts and documents and establish critical connections and adopt an interdisciplinary attitude. | 3 |
| 8) | Upon graduation, students will be able to develop new projects individually or in teams. | 3 |
| 9) | Upon graduation, students will be able to apply their knowledge into their lives for interdisciplinary problem-solving and solutions. | 4 |